xhcmgqtujdu
Region: US
Friday 11 July 2025 12:57:57 GMT
16491
246
29
2
Music
Download
Comments
Shawn Crain :
I will never understand how the PUBLIC knows the law better than LAW ENFORCEMENT.........Jesus
2025-07-11 18:44:19
30
Solo :
Please train these officers.
2025-07-11 18:16:35
7
Larry :
PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE
2025-07-11 18:41:44
4
Michael Thomas Turner :
No, you're not within your rights. your only rights you have is when a crime has been committed your law enforcement you have no authority over. no one unless there's been a law broken. you're not the babysitter of us all. it's just your job and you're not doing it properly
2025-07-11 18:51:19
4
Larry :
NO CRIME NO ID
2025-07-11 18:42:10
3
joeherrick8 :
no crime no I D cop said he was not doing anything wrong now it's trespassing and disorderly conduct another crooked cop End Qualified Immunity
2025-07-11 18:02:36
3
Grambo1961 :
Did he really just bring up Terry versus Ohio as far as identifying?😂
2025-07-13 21:57:51
2
chillyfishwater :
"Do you suspect me of committing a crime?" "Yeah. Disorderly conduct. Or criminal tresspassing. I don't know." Facepalm
2025-07-12 02:00:18
2
Derrick :
it's amazing that cops don't know law and are trying to uphold what they don't know. they hope that the public doesn't know the law to challenge them.
2025-07-11 22:28:52
2
Awesomeness101999 :
"I don't know unless I ID you" is not reasonable suspicion lol
2025-07-11 21:13:07
2
Loretta Murphy :
These terrorists just HAVE to get that ID fix. It’s like a drug to them.
2025-07-11 20:51:27
1
exploits281 :
You don’t know I haven’t trespassed but if you don’t know you most likely can’t articulate a reason to believe I have
2025-07-13 02:51:26
1
Bryant Humphrey :
Why as a cop will i waste my time . It's all ego and power
2025-07-11 20:05:00
1
Jason Scheu220 :
He has a right to ask for id ........... but you don't have to show id unless they can articulate a crime you have committed , in the process of committing or going to commit
2025-07-11 18:28:19
1
SuperKitty24 :
This has to be a skit 😂😂😂😂😂
2025-07-12 22:19:41
0
Michael Thomas Turner :
it's amazing how some people think 16 weeks and an academy and these officers know the law. take longer to be a hairdresser
2025-07-18 02:17:22
0
Tack Rennod :
Costumed jag off
2025-07-12 22:16:54
0
Trever Johnson :
😁😁😁
2025-07-12 16:32:21
0
Belthazar :
🤔 no one has "Rights" that gives dominion over another otherwise there would be 2 Bills of Rights 👀
2025-07-12 13:50:09
0
azgenx :
blue gang so tired of the tyrants. they don't have a right to identify if no crime had been committed
2025-07-11 22:15:24
0
Rich G :
This is why we have a 2nd Amendment
2025-07-11 21:00:32
0
Kentuckyborn :
just because you say you haven't. doesn't prove you haven't
2025-07-11 19:09:49
0
Nathan Schwartz :
@Nathan Schwartz: Terry v. Ohio was a 1967 case, not 1965. Also, It jdoesn’t have anything to do with identification. It had to do with pat down searches and articulated the principle that an officer must have readable articulable suspicion, he or she can initiate a pat down search for weapons in the interest of officer safety.
2025-07-11 19:05:35
0
To see more videos from user @xhcmgqtujdu, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
