@ln81h316vi5b7: #fyp #foryou #audit #police

ln81h316vi5b7
ln81h316vi5b7
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 12 July 2025 09:50:29 GMT
11081
313
31
3

Music

Download

Comments

variablechange88
VariableChange :
he said "all that smart stuff you talking" 🤣🤣💀 cant make it up
2025-07-12 17:54:13
13
demonicgaurdian
Demon :
end qualified immunity and watch their egos disappear
2025-07-13 04:48:03
4
moose_knuckle77
ohioguy77 :
so angry
2025-07-12 12:14:51
3
mcdonsakpf1
J Miller :
They keep saying that they are working on a story, but no one has yet to see this story’!
2025-07-12 23:29:47
0
demonicgaurdian
Demon :
End qualified immunity and dispand their unions and all court awards should be taken from their personal financial accounts and pension plans.
2025-07-13 04:47:45
5
robertrichardson343
Bob :
is suspicion a misdemeanor or felony?
2025-07-12 21:31:15
9
go_fish73
Fish💀 :
They don’t like when you know more than them
2025-07-12 11:27:42
13
lukethurman957
lukethurman957 :
learn the law cops it is time to end qualified immunity make cops pay for what they do not the taxpayers money
2025-07-12 16:10:24
7
survivor5215
YEAITSME :
He thinks his rights to tell you what to do it better than your right to protect your rights. 😏
2025-07-12 16:30:38
4
bobpickard223
Old Marine :
tyranny says I'm in charge
2025-07-12 17:07:36
3
weslemayjr
Wes LeMay Jr. :
Nope not putting the phone down
2025-07-12 23:31:11
1
gtrkidmicsm
gtrkidmicsm :
He got his badge off of eBay😁
2025-07-14 16:25:46
0
volkswagon46
ang :
SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....SUSPICION ISN'T A CRIME....
2025-07-12 18:54:18
0
tee1786
Tee :
🎄
2025-07-14 03:27:52
0
danieldawley481
Daniel Dawley481 :
If cops are supposed to be the good guys, why is it their primary tools are manipulation, gaslighted, and flat out lying. This behavior NEEDS to be stopped !
2025-07-12 11:35:18
7
liberator.x2000
Liberator X2000 :
Taxpayer's money hard at work preserving you and your constitutional rights. Yeah right 🤨
2025-07-13 03:50:00
0
user154380981
Dylan Watson762 :
“Officer, I have not broken any laws, and you have not articulated any reasonable suspicion that I have, am, or will commit a crime. Therefore, you may not lawfully detain me or demand identification. I am not required to assist in any investigation, and my refusal to do so is not obstruction, which requires a physical act. Exercising constitutional rights may not be construed as a crime. If you attempt to detain me unlawfully, I will invoke my Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. As this is a consensual encounter, I now withdraw my consent. Any further engagement without cause constitutes the crime of harassment. Do you understand my rights and the limits of your authority under color of law as explained to you?”   Ignorance of the law is no defense. 18 U.S. Code § 242 makes it a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law”—such as a police officer or government official—to willfully deprive another person of rights protected by the Constitution or federal law. Common violations include excessive force, false arrest, or discriminatory treatment. Penalties vary: up to 1 year in prison for basic offenses, up to 10 years if bodily injury occurs or a weapon is used, and life imprisonment or the death penalty if the violation results in death. This law is a cornerstone for prosecuting civil rights abuses by officials in positions of authority. When no crime has occurred or is reasonably suspected, calling the police to provoke their presence, the first step in the use of force continuum, raises serious constitutional concerns. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures, and coercive police presence. If done with others to suppress lawful conduct, such as filming in public, it may constitute conspiracy to violate rights under 18 U.S. Code § 241, a federal crime. As affirmed in United States v. Price (1966), officials acting under color of law can be criminally liable and a conviction requires gonly proof of an agreement and intent to deprive rights, not actual harm. In Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (2011), the First Circuit held that filming public officials in public is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty” protected by the F
2025-07-12 23:20:13
0
thegreatny.ok
thegreatny.ok :
Park Ranger got upset. Boo hooo
2025-07-12 17:18:06
2
vernonlc0
vernonlc0 :
Should be fired as soon as a supervisor shows up
2025-07-13 00:30:28
1
andylarson77
Andy Dever Larson :
It’s 2025 how can these people be so clueless, there is no expectation of privacy in public. You can record anything that your eyes can see from a public right away.
2025-07-12 16:06:54
1
trod477
Trod :
This is what we have in these streets
2025-07-12 11:34:59
2
robparnell
Rob :
Oh no, the park police
2025-07-12 19:08:42
0
gun.freak
gun freak :
captain jungle bunny is a easy lawsuit 😂😂😂😂
2025-07-13 04:58:23
0
tooth553
tooth :
us park police 😂😂😂😂😂😂chairborn rangers 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
2025-07-13 20:14:21
0
spaceshadow61
flash :
oing oing oing
2025-07-12 15:30:44
0
To see more videos from user @ln81h316vi5b7, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About