@ulasimturkey: Scania 770 S Fire Edition 🔥 #scaniav8 #scania770sv8 #scaniav8

Ulaşım Turkey

Open In TikTok:

Region: UA

Saturday 26 July 2025 16:08:45 GMT

456626

25646

226

2760

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (42.37MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (37.03MB) Watermark .mp4 (43.51MB) Music .mp3

Comments

° :

2025-09-12 13:25:45

73

Ivan :

👍Best of the Best. King of the Road👍

2025-07-27 02:51:26

66

𝑗𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑟 :

Somebody please tell me price

2025-07-27 06:30:26

13

Jacobus Vanwyk :

love this one ☺️☺️

2025-09-06 18:26:31

3

BRO. CHAI💞 :

It's my dream.

2025-07-31 17:04:07

3

Claudio Castillo :

no te puedes enamorar de un camión... yo: 😍😍😍😘😘😘

2025-07-27 01:12:42

5

Руслан :

эта скания остальные даже рядом не стояли💪💪💪💪💪

2025-07-27 05:50:26

60

annadurdyyev. :

10000$?

2025-08-01 10:06:34

2

🇹🇷🇪🇺🚛💛❤️🦁 :

Sadece sesi dinle

2025-07-30 06:45:17

2

DT50cc :

qual é o preço?? how much cost??

2025-08-26 20:15:04

2

Hải Nguyễn.93 ✅️ :

ko còn gì để chê...quá đẹp ❤️❤️❤️

2025-08-31 23:12:28

2

ОМАР :

Скания самая лучшая марка , обожаю сканию ,топ номер один🔥🔥🔥🔥

2025-07-28 09:44:51

21

Guliwer :

piękna

2025-08-07 20:22:38

2

Mustafa Bayrak :

pendik limanda canlı görmek nasip oldu resmen koleksiyonluk makina 👑

2025-07-30 18:09:26

4

Роман Арнгольд :

Я даже боюсь спрашивать сколько она стоит

2025-08-21 17:59:23

7

אילן קידר :

הלוואי עליי לקבל אחת כזו חלום!!!

2025-09-02 15:54:11

2

Danila Master :

Один звук мотора говорит обо всем какая мощь🔥

2025-07-27 16:27:54

6

Евгений 80 :

скамеечка сила

2025-08-11 07:12:53

6

🚛КАЛЯН ЯРМАК🚛 :

Scania najlepsza z najlepszych 💪💪💪🔥🔥🔥

2025-07-27 06:43:41

7

paolobalsamo999 :

Meraviglioso

2025-08-28 15:09:01

2

ปริญญา ใยสวัสดิ์ :

อยากขับอ่ะ

2025-09-03 16:20:00

2

Igos :

Ай красотка 👌

2025-07-27 06:12:27

3

Обычный Поц😯 :

это 3 часть етс в Виар ачках

2025-08-24 17:05:56

2

rafalin :

Que pasada

2025-07-27 07:48:57

3

Alex :

классный аппарат 👍👍👍💪💪

2025-07-27 07:55:19

3

To see more videos from user @ulasimturkey, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#مجتبى_خامنئي #السيد_علي_الخامنئي #ايران_والعراق_لايمكن_الفراق #السستاني_علي_السستاني_دام_ضله #مقتدىالصدر

#مجتبى_خامنئي #السيد_علي_الخامنئي #ايران_والعراق_لايمكن_الفراق #السستاني_علي_السستاني_دام_ضله #مقتدىالصدر

#محمد_سلطان

#محمد_سلطان

Witness wa ingoo 😂😂#fypシ゚viral #fyp #foryou #viralvideo #fypシ

Witness wa ingoo 😂😂#fypシ゚viral #fyp #foryou #viralvideo #fypシ

There’s a new 2026 paper in Nature Metabolism titled: “Whole-blood NAD+ levels do not reflect healthy ageing.” And social media is already turning this into: “See? NAD doesn’t decline with age.” “NAD supplements are pointless.” But that is NOT what this paper showed. Here’s what the researchers actually found: They measured NAD+ levels in WHOLE BLOOD and found that blood NAD+ levels did not consistently decline with age. Their conclusion? Whole-blood NAD+ is likely NOT a reliable biomarker for healthy aging. That’s very different from saying NAD+ inside tissues or cells does not decline with age. NAD+ does its real work INSIDE cells: • mitochondria • muscle • brain • liver • immune cells And this paper did not directly measure intracellular NAD+ in those tissues. This is something I’ve talked about before: Commercial blood NAD tests are probably not very useful because blood may not reflect what’s happening inside tissues. But that does NOT automatically mean: • tissue NAD+ stays stable with age • mitochondrial NAD+ is unaffected • supplementation is useless In fact, multiple published studies still show age-related NAD+ decline in tissues, especially in muscle, liver, and mitochondrial compartments. What this paper really tells us is: A simple blood draw may not be a good way to assess NAD biology or “biological age.” And honestly… that’s not surprising. A lot of aging biology is compartment-specific. What’s happening inside mitochondria often does NOT show up clearly in circulation. So this paper is really more about the limitations of blood biomarkers than it is a “debunking” of NAD decline or NAD research altogether. Science is nuanced. One paper rarely overturns an entire body of literature.

There’s a new 2026 paper in Nature Metabolism titled: “Whole-blood NAD+ levels do not reflect healthy ageing.” And social media is already turning this into: “See? NAD doesn’t decline with age.” “NAD supplements are pointless.” But that is NOT what this paper showed. Here’s what the researchers actually found: They measured NAD+ levels in WHOLE BLOOD and found that blood NAD+ levels did not consistently decline with age. Their conclusion? Whole-blood NAD+ is likely NOT a reliable biomarker for healthy aging. That’s very different from saying NAD+ inside tissues or cells does not decline with age. NAD+ does its real work INSIDE cells: • mitochondria • muscle • brain • liver • immune cells And this paper did not directly measure intracellular NAD+ in those tissues. This is something I’ve talked about before: Commercial blood NAD tests are probably not very useful because blood may not reflect what’s happening inside tissues. But that does NOT automatically mean: • tissue NAD+ stays stable with age • mitochondrial NAD+ is unaffected • supplementation is useless In fact, multiple published studies still show age-related NAD+ decline in tissues, especially in muscle, liver, and mitochondrial compartments. What this paper really tells us is: A simple blood draw may not be a good way to assess NAD biology or “biological age.” And honestly… that’s not surprising. A lot of aging biology is compartment-specific. What’s happening inside mitochondria often does NOT show up clearly in circulation. So this paper is really more about the limitations of blood biomarkers than it is a “debunking” of NAD decline or NAD research altogether. Science is nuanced. One paper rarely overturns an entire body of literature.

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy