@ulasimturkey: Scania 770 S Fire Edition 🔥 #scaniav8 #scania770sv8 #scaniav8

Ulaşım Turkey
Ulaşım Turkey
Open In TikTok:
Region: UA
Saturday 26 July 2025 16:08:45 GMT
456626
25646
226
2760

Music

Download

Comments

.boobs_
° :
2025-09-12 13:25:45
73
ivansaabscania
Ivan :
👍Best of the Best. King of the Road👍
2025-07-27 02:51:26
66
kyawminoo.2006
𝑗𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑟 :
Somebody please tell me price
2025-07-27 06:30:26
13
user2052863199206
Jacobus Vanwyk :
love this one ☺️☺️
2025-09-06 18:26:31
3
bro..chai
BRO. CHAI💞 :
It's my dream.
2025-07-31 17:04:07
3
claudio7castillo
Claudio Castillo :
no te puedes enamorar de un camión... yo: 😍😍😍😘😘😘
2025-07-27 01:12:42
5
ruslanscan7
Руслан :
эта скания остальные даже рядом не стояли💪💪💪💪💪
2025-07-27 05:50:26
60
suleyman_1108
annadurdyyev. :
10000$?
2025-08-01 10:06:34
2
mekansiz028
🇹🇷🇪🇺🚛💛❤️🦁 :
Sadece sesi dinle
2025-07-30 06:45:17
2
alexandredt50
DT50cc :
qual é o preço?? how much cost??
2025-08-26 20:15:04
2
hai_nguyen.93
Hải Nguyễn.93 ✅️ :
ko còn gì để chê...quá đẹp ❤️❤️❤️
2025-08-31 23:12:28
2
_omap_30_let_
ОМАР :
Скания самая лучшая марка , обожаю сканию ,топ номер один🔥🔥🔥🔥
2025-07-28 09:44:51
21
grzegorzboro61
Guliwer :
piękna
2025-08-07 20:22:38
2
mustafabayrak5461
Mustafa Bayrak :
pendik limanda canlı görmek nasip oldu resmen koleksiyonluk makina 👑
2025-07-30 18:09:26
4
romario_dos_santos
Роман Арнгольд :
Я даже боюсь спрашивать сколько она стоит
2025-08-21 17:59:23
7
user9532220020695
אילן קידר :
הלוואי עליי לקבל אחת כזו חלום!!!
2025-09-02 15:54:11
2
danila.master3
Danila Master :
Один звук мотора говорит обо всем какая мощь🔥
2025-07-27 16:27:54
6
dddf47801
Евгений 80 :
скамеечка сила
2025-08-11 07:12:53
6
koliagavryliuk
🚛КАЛЯН ЯРМАК🚛 :
Scania najlepsza z najlepszych 💪💪💪🔥🔥🔥
2025-07-27 06:43:41
7
paolobalsamo999
paolobalsamo999 :
Meraviglioso
2025-08-28 15:09:01
2
aongaum2522
ปริญญา ใยสวัสดิ์ :
อยากขับอ่ะ
2025-09-03 16:20:00
2
igos00
Igos :
Ай красотка 👌
2025-07-27 06:12:27
3
glamur_ney
Обычный Поц😯 :
это 3 часть етс в Виар ачках
2025-08-24 17:05:56
2
rafa198424
rafalin :
Que pasada
2025-07-27 07:48:57
3
alexfellinger486
Alex :
классный аппарат 👍👍👍💪💪
2025-07-27 07:55:19
3
To see more videos from user @ulasimturkey, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

There’s a new 2026 paper in Nature Metabolism titled: “Whole-blood NAD+ levels do not reflect healthy ageing.” And social media is already turning this into: “See? NAD doesn’t decline with age.” “NAD supplements are pointless.” But that is NOT what this paper showed. Here’s what the researchers actually found: They measured NAD+ levels in WHOLE BLOOD and found that blood NAD+ levels did not consistently decline with age. Their conclusion? Whole-blood NAD+ is likely NOT a reliable biomarker for healthy aging. That’s very different from saying NAD+ inside tissues or cells does not decline with age. NAD+ does its real work INSIDE cells: • mitochondria • muscle • brain • liver • immune cells And this paper did not directly measure intracellular NAD+ in those tissues. This is something I’ve talked about before: Commercial blood NAD tests are probably not very useful because blood may not reflect what’s happening inside tissues. But that does NOT automatically mean: • tissue NAD+ stays stable with age • mitochondrial NAD+ is unaffected • supplementation is useless In fact, multiple published studies still show age-related NAD+ decline in tissues, especially in muscle, liver, and mitochondrial compartments. What this paper really tells us is: A simple blood draw may not be a good way to assess NAD biology or “biological age.” And honestly… that’s not surprising. A lot of aging biology is compartment-specific. What’s happening inside mitochondria often does NOT show up clearly in circulation. So this paper is really more about the limitations of blood biomarkers than it is a “debunking” of NAD decline or NAD research altogether. Science is nuanced. One paper rarely overturns an entire body of literature.
There’s a new 2026 paper in Nature Metabolism titled: “Whole-blood NAD+ levels do not reflect healthy ageing.” And social media is already turning this into: “See? NAD doesn’t decline with age.” “NAD supplements are pointless.” But that is NOT what this paper showed. Here’s what the researchers actually found: They measured NAD+ levels in WHOLE BLOOD and found that blood NAD+ levels did not consistently decline with age. Their conclusion? Whole-blood NAD+ is likely NOT a reliable biomarker for healthy aging. That’s very different from saying NAD+ inside tissues or cells does not decline with age. NAD+ does its real work INSIDE cells: • mitochondria • muscle • brain • liver • immune cells And this paper did not directly measure intracellular NAD+ in those tissues. This is something I’ve talked about before: Commercial blood NAD tests are probably not very useful because blood may not reflect what’s happening inside tissues. But that does NOT automatically mean: • tissue NAD+ stays stable with age • mitochondrial NAD+ is unaffected • supplementation is useless In fact, multiple published studies still show age-related NAD+ decline in tissues, especially in muscle, liver, and mitochondrial compartments. What this paper really tells us is: A simple blood draw may not be a good way to assess NAD biology or “biological age.” And honestly… that’s not surprising. A lot of aging biology is compartment-specific. What’s happening inside mitochondria often does NOT show up clearly in circulation. So this paper is really more about the limitations of blood biomarkers than it is a “debunking” of NAD decline or NAD research altogether. Science is nuanced. One paper rarely overturns an entire body of literature.

About