@penghonie: the wifi was so bad #jay#jungwon#enhypen

ines ⋆. 𐙚 ˚

Open In TikTok:

Region: FR

Saturday 02 August 2025 10:39:41 GMT

337760

87770

373

9530

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.26MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.26MB) Watermark .mp4 (0.27MB) Music .mp3

Comments

𝜗𝜚 :

with the same face too 😭

2025-08-02 11:31:02

14690

a¹⁰⁰⁹ :

yall it wasn’t lagging jay just does that sometimes

2025-08-02 15:49:47

3183

briefix_on :

2025-08-03 00:14:35

505

✞︎르블릭스✞︎✔︎ :

New matching pfp or wallpapers

2025-08-07 06:57:35

528

jaejamyun :

jungwon's expression is k1lling me 😭😭

2025-08-02 12:00:15

7602

flowerbloom~~en- :

Look what i got

2025-08-02 19:24:33

257

MEGAN FAN :

How did he do that 😭

2025-08-02 18:18:51

174

ZzZzZaina💤 ྀིྀི :

north korea wifi

2025-08-02 19:52:11

40

ts🐈‍⬛ <3 :

the sound effect..😭😭😭

2025-08-02 14:46:00

1604

itnotmanvik :

The woman was to stunned to speak😭💔

2025-08-02 15:47:18

38

~❤️‍🩹NANA💓~ :

Ummm…

2025-08-02 19:22:44

126

Yongbok🍼 :

its not lagging jay just has powers🤭

2025-08-02 20:36:43

7

Maïlis 🦢 :

they have instagram ??

2025-08-02 22:12:31

0

유리 :

Always knew jay had some sort of powers🙂‍↔️

2025-08-02 17:01:40

307

FriesWithThatShake :

I keep reading enhypen as epipen I'm drying

2025-08-06 20:07:21

4

ʚଓ :

I was surprised at that time too. I think it's a ghost 😭😭

2025-08-02 13:25:58

38

Jess 𐙚 :

2025-08-02 15:30:26

7

Acelovesyou! :

What are y’all surprised Jay can teleport?

2025-08-02 16:41:16

1524

꒰ᩘ ּі͢᥎͠ᥡ ្! ❀ᮬᩥ᭪ׅ :

Even jungwon was confused 😭

2025-08-02 13:20:32

703

marie 🥟 :

i got the same reaction as Jungwon

2025-08-02 21:24:44

153

engene_032524 :

2025-08-02 16:55:01

2

마르와🕸 :

2025-08-07 14:58:53

1

𝖘𝖔𝖞𝖆𝖆_𝖘𝖔𝖏𝖎⁷ :

it's normal y'all he can do that he's a vampire 😛

2025-08-09 16:16:14

2

️ :

2025-08-07 02:53:52

13

djema :

2025-08-07 09:01:02

26

To see more videos from user @penghonie, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Yep Roblox is cooked in August 23rd #Fyp#Roblox#August23#Myedit

Yep Roblox is cooked in August 23rd #Fyp#Roblox#August23#Myedit

Chạy chất – dáng đẹp – tiết kiệm xăng tuyệt đối! Di Bao – xe điện của thế hệ mới! #xediendibao #dibaovietnam .@DIBAO Việt Nam

Chạy chất – dáng đẹp – tiết kiệm xăng tuyệt đối! Di Bao – xe điện của thế hệ mới! #xediendibao #dibaovietnam .@DIBAO Việt Nam

Amiga si es posible mejorar la apariencia de las varices y la circulación en tus piernas 🫶🏻 Escríbeme para más info #varicesenlaspiernas #varices

Amiga si es posible mejorar la apariencia de las varices y la circulación en tus piernas 🫶🏻 Escríbeme para más info #varicesenlaspiernas #varices

California Supreme Court Clears Path for Newsom’s Mid-Decade Redistricting Bid Sacramento, August 21, 2025 – The California Supreme Court has declined to halt Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed redistricting initiative, allowing it to move forward toward a possible special-election ballot this November. In a ruling late Wednesday, the court found that the Republican-led challenge failed to justify emergency relief under the state constitution. Democratic lawmakers are racing to pass the measure by August 22—just in time to place it on the November 4 ballot—despite objections from Republicans who argue the process violated a mandatory 30-day public review period. The proposed constitutional amendment, dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act, would temporarily suspend the authority of the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission and allow the Legislature to redraw congressional districts for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections. Control would revert to the commission afterward. Background and Motivations Newsom framed the initiative as a countermove to a mid-decade redistricting push in Texas, led by GOP lawmakers and backed by President Donald Trump. That effort aims to add five Republican-leaning congressional seats. Newsom and Democrats cast their proposal as a necessary defense of fair representation in the face of partisan maneuvers. Political Reactions The political fallout has been intense. Former President Barack Obama praised the California plan as “responsible” and a temporary response to aggressive Republican redistricting elsewhere. Republican officials, by contrast, condemned the measure as a blatant power grab, violating the voter-mandated commission system established by Propositions 11 (2008) and 20 (2010). They argue the strategy bypasses essential transparency and fairness safeguards. Legislative Hearing and Public Debate A heated legislative hearing recently highlighted the sharp partisan divide. Republicans criticized the process as rushed and secretive, contending that voter funds should address pressing state issues rather than politically motivated redistricting. Democrats and allied unions defended the effort as a guard against GOP-led strategies. Estimates suggest the special election could cost over $230 million. Legal Considerations and Outlook Legal scholars note the plan runs up against California’s constitution, which specifies that redistricting authority resides with the independent commission and occurs only once every decade. Bypassing these rules would require a constitutional amendment—precisely what Newsom is pursuing—but that path faces steep legal and political hurdles. Conclusion and What Lies Ahead With the Supreme Court refusal to block legislative action, the redistricting proposal now heads to a key vote in the Legislature. If two-thirds majorities pass it, the amendment would then appear on the November 4 ballot for voters to decide. The prospect of extensive legal challenges looms, and the outcome could dramatically reshuffle California’s congressional delegation in the 2026 election. At stake are critical questions around democratic norms, representation, and the balance of power. Whether voters approve the measure—and how courts respond—will shape the political landscape well beyond this decade.

California Supreme Court Clears Path for Newsom’s Mid-Decade Redistricting Bid Sacramento, August 21, 2025 – The California Supreme Court has declined to halt Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed redistricting initiative, allowing it to move forward toward a possible special-election ballot this November. In a ruling late Wednesday, the court found that the Republican-led challenge failed to justify emergency relief under the state constitution. Democratic lawmakers are racing to pass the measure by August 22—just in time to place it on the November 4 ballot—despite objections from Republicans who argue the process violated a mandatory 30-day public review period. The proposed constitutional amendment, dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act, would temporarily suspend the authority of the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission and allow the Legislature to redraw congressional districts for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections. Control would revert to the commission afterward. Background and Motivations Newsom framed the initiative as a countermove to a mid-decade redistricting push in Texas, led by GOP lawmakers and backed by President Donald Trump. That effort aims to add five Republican-leaning congressional seats. Newsom and Democrats cast their proposal as a necessary defense of fair representation in the face of partisan maneuvers. Political Reactions The political fallout has been intense. Former President Barack Obama praised the California plan as “responsible” and a temporary response to aggressive Republican redistricting elsewhere. Republican officials, by contrast, condemned the measure as a blatant power grab, violating the voter-mandated commission system established by Propositions 11 (2008) and 20 (2010). They argue the strategy bypasses essential transparency and fairness safeguards. Legislative Hearing and Public Debate A heated legislative hearing recently highlighted the sharp partisan divide. Republicans criticized the process as rushed and secretive, contending that voter funds should address pressing state issues rather than politically motivated redistricting. Democrats and allied unions defended the effort as a guard against GOP-led strategies. Estimates suggest the special election could cost over $230 million. Legal Considerations and Outlook Legal scholars note the plan runs up against California’s constitution, which specifies that redistricting authority resides with the independent commission and occurs only once every decade. Bypassing these rules would require a constitutional amendment—precisely what Newsom is pursuing—but that path faces steep legal and political hurdles. Conclusion and What Lies Ahead With the Supreme Court refusal to block legislative action, the redistricting proposal now heads to a key vote in the Legislature. If two-thirds majorities pass it, the amendment would then appear on the November 4 ballot for voters to decide. The prospect of extensive legal challenges looms, and the outcome could dramatically reshuffle California’s congressional delegation in the 2026 election. At stake are critical questions around democratic norms, representation, and the balance of power. Whether voters approve the measure—and how courts respond—will shape the political landscape well beyond this decade.

الرد على @salmajune #وقفين_و_ربي_معااااااناااا💪💪🔥🤫🤫 #اسبانيا🇪🇸_ايطاليا🇮🇹_البرتغال🇵🇹 #tiktokindia #المانيا🇩🇪_النمسا🇦🇹_السويد_هولندا🇪🇺🧿كل #الحمدالله

الرد على @salmajune #وقفين_و_ربي_معااااااناااا💪💪🔥🤫🤫 #اسبانيا🇪🇸_ايطاليا🇮🇹_البرتغال🇵🇹 #tiktokindia #المانيا🇩🇪_النمسا🇦🇹_السويد_هولندا🇪🇺🧿كل #الحمدالله

Finally purchased after being in my wishlist for months🌀

Finally purchased after being in my wishlist for months🌀

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy