user817579513297300 :
Here is why birds are NOT reptiles:
I think this is misunderstanding.
Saying that birds are dinosaurs is the same as saying that a mammoth is an elephant or a man is a monkey, but no, these are separate branches of evolution. The way of understanding you talk about is confusing, from that logic we can fill the blanks of evolution way more, and we will came to the result that every land reptile, mammal and bird is ancestor of some early amniotes, but the difference in between is HUGE, that stop us from classifying like that. We can call some of dinosaurs birds and we can call every dinosaur a reptile, but we can't call birds as reptiles, because they are just too different, we can say that birds came from reptiles, because it's true, but this can be a very complicated question calling them reptiles, they are heirs of archosaurus, but they are still too different from them, I can't answer most of questions fully, because that's still a topic that cause debates in paleontological community. I am curious of hearing why aren't mammals classified as amniotes, and why aren't archosaurus fish?
2025-08-04 15:23:34