@whateverpod: 2+2 DOES NOT EQUAL 4??? Zina from Jubilee vs. DPH debate! GETS HEATED! 2+2 DOES NOT EQUAL 4??? Zina from Jubilee vs. DPH debate! GETS HEATED!

marmalademum :

She’s really arguing if 2+2 =4 😆

Erik Lugo :

What in the world is this woman talking about?

foidkiller :

the funny thing is she's right

Oakenshield :

If u read Einstein vs Tagore argument. You will appreciate where she is coming from.

ThirdEye.01 :

She said nothing using a lot of words.. 😂

meme_tinz :

2 + 2 = 4 is true within the standard axioms of arithmetic, and its truth depends on the formal system in which the statement is made. It is not “true” by nature alone; it is true because of how the number system is defined. 1. In standard arithmetic (Peano axioms), 2 + 2 = 4 is necessarily true • “2” is defined as the successor of 1. • “3” is defined as the successor of 2. • “4” is defined as the successor of 3. • Addition is defined recursively. Under these definitions, 2 + 2 = 4 is a logical consequence of the axioms. It is not up for debate once the axioms are accepted. 2. It’s still not a physical law—it’s a formal truth Mathematical truth depends on: • The axioms chosen • The definitions of the symbols In the usual system of natural numbers, it’s a theorem. In a different formal system—if you redefine objects or operations—the statement could change. 3. In non-standard systems Examples: • In modular arithmetic, 2 + 2 might not equal 4. • In mod 3: 2 + 2 = 1. • In some abstract algebraic structures, the symbols “2” or “+” may have different meanings. This does not mean everyday arithmetic is arbitrary. It means mathematics is built on formal foundations, and truths depend on those foundations. 4. So what’s the best way to interpret this? 2 + 2 = 4 is not an opinion; it is a theorem in the number system humans have defined. It is “true” because: • We have defined “2”, “4”, and “+” • We use axioms that produce internally consistent results • It maps perfectly to how discrete quantities work in the physical world In ordinary life and science, 2 + 2 = 4 is unconditionally true because we all operate within the same axioms.

Quame Jude :

she said alot of nothing😂😂

Cervantes5655 :

Let her paycheck be short and she will see how fast she starts doing math.

Ntombi Msana 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈 :

She is too intelligent. Its just that she could not explain it in a way that many people can comprehend. But I agree with her

TowerOfLondon :

What the heck is she talking about?

Jon W 🇨🇦 :

At first I thought he was being a bit harsh.

Michael :

Why does everything have to be so hard... all the time...

Dodger Dog :

“What do you mean by always?” 💀

Ghost😈 :

Is school illegal in America 🤔

The Fourth 🍀 :

this long talk for 2+2,..nawa

Lol :

Lex :

mathematicians agree with her

Jake Major JKD :

She put so much effort into not answering his question.

michaelredd70 :

Wow.

hectorserrano2301 :

She was raised by parents that always told her she was right.

nerdsletstok :

Crazy thing is I’m sure there’s other people who agree with her 😂

Jeff Isola :

She sounds like Kamala! Word salad! 🤣🤣🤣

Monja :

Those who have studied semantic logic know that «2 + 2 = 4» is not always true

💫 :

Mortred 👾👾👾 :

2+2=4 Simple 😅