@lao52_haous:

joey_the_man23 :

City property is public property

DopamineKata2 :

Beardedkool :

Good job sir. Keep up the good work.🇺🇸🦾

Samuel Hernández Quiñones :

They have to be held accountable for the asinine missing for unlawful behaviors so they can stop wasting my valuable tax dollars

rbouthillette :

oh how funny it all changes when he demands they put they sign their name to it

Truth75 :

Lawsuit

JAMES JACKSON :

STATE IS PUBLIC

tash :

not a clue

Tom Kollarik :

Part2

JJ 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 :

Winnipeg Manitoba Canada 🇨🇦 💜 😎 🙌 ❤️♥️🇨🇦 💜 😎

BamBam :

City property is paid for by the public so it’s public property

bigedm :

Unarmed public employees calling armed public employees to deal with unarmed citizens who want public employees to do their job!

Impalafrank70 :

FEED ME DONUTS !

Dark :

City property is public property

MidwestMisfit :

😘

William Archie :

😂

hanner :

😡😡😡

hanner :

🥵🥵🥵

Brian :

😁

Kelly5 :

😁😁😁

JT :

🤲

USA Luxury Resorts :

🔥🥰

andytherock02 :

😂😂😂

Aaron Ames :

AI Overview +3 No, the Supreme Court has not ruled that police can randomly stop and ask for IDs from people on the street; rather, in cases like Brown v. Texas (1979), the Court has held that police cannot stop someone on the street and ask for identification without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. However, in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court (2004), the Court did allow officers to demand a person's name during a lawful stop based on reasonable suspicion.  Key Supreme Court Rulings Brown v. Texas (1979): The Court established that absent reasonable suspicion, police cannot simply stop people on the street and ask for their identification.  Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court (2004): This case upheld "stop and identify" laws, ruling that police could require an individual to provide their name if they were lawfully stopped under reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.

Karen Nisbet :

No crime NO ID!