@vimgblox: CR7 AURA DESTRUIDORA 💀 #futebol #funny #react #vimgzera #like #aura #moments #cr7 #destruidor

Vimgzera YT
Vimgzera YT
Open In TikTok:
Region: BR
Friday 15 August 2025 18:00:00 GMT
783
21
2
0

Music

Download

Comments

br_ghost_2
br_ghost_2 :
eu já caí com você na ranqueada no ff
2025-08-18 20:15:37
0
netofc.0
💯 RSN 👑 :
💯💯💯
2025-08-15 18:03:56
0
To see more videos from user @vimgblox, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The Guardian has successfully defended a libel action brought by the actor Noel Clarke over an investigation by the newspaper in which he was accused of sexual misconduct by more than 20 women. In a high court judgment handed down on Friday, Mrs Justice Steyn rejected Clarke’s claim. He had said the allegations set out in the Guardian’s investigation were false and that he had been the victim of a conspiracy. Clarke, 49, had said he would seek £70m in damages if successful. The Guardian relied on testimony from almost 30 people, 18 of whom gave accounts in court about their experiences of working with Clarke, a former star of Doctor Who. Many said they had been directly affected by Clarke, while others said they had witnessed inappropriate behaviour. The Guardian argued the allegations were true and that the articles and podcast about him were in the public interest. The allegations against Clarke were made up of the following elements, there were strong grounds to believe: - That over 15 years, he used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues. - He sometimes bullied female colleagues. - He engaged in unwanted sexual contact, kissing, touching or groping. - He engaged in sexually inappropriate behaviour and comments. - He was involved in professional misconduct. - He took and shared explicit pictures and videos without consent, including secretly filming a young actor’s naked audition. Read our legal affairs correspondent Haroon Siddique’s full report via the link in bio.
The Guardian has successfully defended a libel action brought by the actor Noel Clarke over an investigation by the newspaper in which he was accused of sexual misconduct by more than 20 women. In a high court judgment handed down on Friday, Mrs Justice Steyn rejected Clarke’s claim. He had said the allegations set out in the Guardian’s investigation were false and that he had been the victim of a conspiracy. Clarke, 49, had said he would seek £70m in damages if successful. The Guardian relied on testimony from almost 30 people, 18 of whom gave accounts in court about their experiences of working with Clarke, a former star of Doctor Who. Many said they had been directly affected by Clarke, while others said they had witnessed inappropriate behaviour. The Guardian argued the allegations were true and that the articles and podcast about him were in the public interest. The allegations against Clarke were made up of the following elements, there were strong grounds to believe: - That over 15 years, he used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues. - He sometimes bullied female colleagues. - He engaged in unwanted sexual contact, kissing, touching or groping. - He engaged in sexually inappropriate behaviour and comments. - He was involved in professional misconduct. - He took and shared explicit pictures and videos without consent, including secretly filming a young actor’s naked audition. Read our legal affairs correspondent Haroon Siddique’s full report via the link in bio.

About