@yuvaltheterrible: Replying to @JJJSS why the data doesn’t show any evidence of foul play, part 2.

db_md :

This is one of those things where Austin is convincingly arguing the vibes because he's 100% right about the vibes, and you are pointing out that they are just vibes tho, and that's not the same as data and facts and details. Love both of you guys, but you are undoubtedly right on this one.

Jacalyn :

Im curious if either of you have checked out the info from data scientists in several states that show irregularity? Like the lawsuit in NY, the NC reports, the NV reports that all raise some serious questions with the math to back it up. I’m wondering if it would change either of your views. I’m personally waiting for the NY lawsuit to be underway because it will likely cause other states to look into things. The data is weird. Not mainstream sources, the ones from people who run nonprofits that look into elections as their job. I don’t think anyone thinks Trump is smart enough to figure out a ziploc bag, but Elon musk is smart enough to hire the right people to do something.

LilyBeans :

The fact that we ‘know’ he’s such a massive famed cheater goes to show he ISNT VERY GOOD AT IT. So why is he suddenly a completely undetectable cheater who has control over every municipality in a national election across states whose elections are decentralized in their administration with multiple political makeups very unfriendly to him.

Tyler 672 :

I really hate the oh Trump could have cheated arguments because it just distracts from several other issues that Democrats lost on and could have done better and ignores the strides in cultifying their members that Republicans have been making.

MoonRaiser117 :

Those comments are depressing, they can’t handle the truth. I hate how much the country was willing to vote for him too. The burden on proof is on the accuser and unfortunately there’s little to no evidence.

Jeremiah Walton :

I think what really annoys me about Austin's video is that he keeps saying "I'm not trying to make any claims I'm just trying to open up the conversation" like come on, stand behind what you're saying here

Gucci.Michelle :

Mommy….Daddy….please stop fighting 😩

mr_noseybonk :

KarlMarxAndChill :

Yes, but he had Elon to help?

J_Siddy :

Austin was one of those liberals blaming Jill Stein for the 2024 loss without even bothering to do basic math. Really sad to see him playing into these conspiracy theories too.

Zach High :

I just want it to be said that I really admire and respect both of you, and I’m really glad this discussion can continue to be had in such a constructive and cordial way. I look forward to more of this back-and-forth

Ani :

I made the same point to Austin about “theory of opportunity” and it’s frustrating to see him make these points. As a former election worker, it’s just not a plausible theory in any way. I appreciate your research and levelheadedness on this topic.

Cassandra🪷 :

This isn’t about facts, it’s mental & emotional avoidance. They don’t want to face that 2/3 of the country either voted for Trump or was complicit by not voting. But this is exactly how fa$¢¡$ts often come to power. We just repeated history.

danny :

I know both of you are talking to an audience, but im quite curious to see how this conversation would go if you were speaking to only each other

Glxy :

My biggest issue is like. Okay he cheated - and? He’s president, the current administration won’t do anything about that, and even if they did we get stuck with likely another MAGA person. It just doesn’t matter, we have other 💩 to focus on

For Better or Worse Podcast :

the problem is that it all just feels fishy. and the current democrat leaders refuse to even question it and it makes me feel like I'm crazy for thinking that it's fishy.

Baudi :

What about the very open efforts of state republicans to purge voters. Is it reasonable to conclude that contributed enough to lower turnout by Democrats to swing the election?

Charles :

The truth is discomforting. We gotta deal with it

Poseidon🍉 :

the problem with this conversation too is us taking the conversation away from the mostly legal ways we can prove they are cheating. ie voter suppression, and gerrymandering

cromwellian :

this seems to come down to what is considered cheating and i hate debates that are just semantics 💀✋

Benito :

Love the conversation. It is so so so needed.

fififromsmhwere :

Austin is using a lot of narratives and illustrations instead of actual data and poisoning the well a bit using nuh uh I don't like your data, I like him but he has a brand of really liking democrats so he has a interest in making Trump look like the only problem in us politics, bordering conspiracy at that point

ben.mufengi :

as a north carolinian, seeing people act hysterically over our very typical election results makes me laugh. besides, the republican candidate for governor this time around made NATIONAL news for being insane so it would make sense that nc dems would have such a big win LOL

/r̥iˈanɔn/ :

it's so weird to me how people believe conspiracy theories based 100% on vibes and "trust me bro" and 0% on credible evidence rather than just accept Occam's razor that the unpopular candidate who was tied to the unpopular incumbent was in fact unpopular. screaming into the void at referees that don't exist won't get us anywhere. as someone who works in elections, thanks for making this video

Clippity :

If somebody's reaction to hard data is to just "nuh uh it's fake" then they really aren't operating on a logical level...