so same as my car, Max speed 240 mph, but I have to share the road with others
2025-08-21 15:16:09
749
Chevassus :
Statistically trains are HEAVILY subsidized by governments, and they are absolutely horrible for moving people in the United States. Note: For freight, they’re fantastic. But given the wide expanse of the United States people simply aren’t concentrated here like they are in foreign countries. That’s why we have individual cars.
2025-08-21 18:58:25
12
Alex. PBT. 🩸 :
America has a 130 year road based infrastructure. It would cost more then elon musks networth and take 30+ years to change it to be like Europe. Even if we wanted to (which most Americans don’t btw) we Couldn’t do it.
2025-08-21 22:06:45
65
twopeasinabucketfckit :
Our railways are absolute garbage in this country and the subways are terrifying. It could be a source of national pride and helpful instead ide rather take a bus
2025-08-21 23:31:13
4
rajivravio :
Basically they don't have the technology to make it but won't admit it
2025-08-21 17:32:47
6
Free The Figure :
Clearly, the only solution is dedicated railways, then. That would cost a pretty penny though.
2025-08-21 16:44:04
171
Reyy :
is this a sign to gamble??✌️🥀
2025-08-21 14:12:46
94
Tvck :
You forget Japan is a fraction land wise of America
2025-08-24 03:55:51
30
cruz :
only 70 miles and once in awhile they can go 160 think I'd probably better off driving
2025-08-21 15:28:07
3
World Exploratory :
Now that uber/lyft are established and autonomous vehicles around the corner, trains make the most sense for public transportation between cities. Instead of adding highways/interstates we should be adding dedicated high speed rail.
2025-08-21 17:19:38
1
Blasian :
your talking about 100 to 120 year if they are lucky.
2025-08-21 23:42:02
0
tesco_run :
On the east coast, those tracks have been there for over a hundred years. They’d have to either completely rip out and replace the existing track, or build a new route through existing towns.
2025-09-03 14:19:07
0
#1B-1Aglazer🇺🇸⚓️🦅🔥☦️ :
Us railroads are built for transportation of cargo not really passengers. If you notice that’s why we have much more advancements in automobiles and airports and etc
2025-08-22 17:30:45
1
brianreamateo :
Also don’t forget old infrastructure for trains or outdated like bridge or tunnels
2025-09-04 14:18:20
1
Ai :
When was the last time America got an infrastructure upgrade
2025-08-25 22:01:00
2
Kenzo :
in another words, US not ready for high speed train
2025-08-23 11:21:47
1
Alex. PBT. 🩸 :
We don’t have a need for trains. Everyone owns cars there cheap usually reliable and fuel Ie 4x cheaper then the rest of the world and even if you take a train your gonna need to rent a car in NYC anyways to get around even if they had good trains in NYC cars are still more flexible so people would pick them. Most people live 2-5 hours away from a major city (our highways are 130kph) do you really think taking a train to go get your groceries for the week is a good economic or practical choic? Europe with all its many nations is smaller than the USA by itsself.
2025-08-21 19:40:31
2
mystery :
I mean let's be honest Amtrak owns the Northeast corridor and tracks so they could just kick SEPTA New Jersey Transit Long Island railroad Metro-North Virginia railway Express or Marc
2025-12-15 20:02:20
0
Hayden Richmond-Yates :
Well those same companies with the trains don’t take care of the tracks well enough. Just ask the people from Ohio
2025-10-15 22:14:54
0
Phoenix :
bro good those amtrak trains always be detailing.
2025-09-29 21:50:14
0
bluecircle :
yeah, we don't take trains. I've never met anyone ever who took a train anywhere
2025-09-06 03:36:28
0
The_light_bring3r :
who cares about trains lmao. thats not an American thing. Airplanes are
2025-09-05 01:48:43
0
danvantsang :
China built their infrastructure in the 1990-2010s… US built in 1800-1960s.. that’s just a reality
2025-08-29 21:28:13
0
To see more videos from user @dingnewscorp, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.