xg_laohao65
Region: US
Sunday 24 August 2025 05:02:51 GMT
42603
731
33
5
Music
Download
Comments
Auditfrauditorsstopharassnent :
Great job Officer!
2025-08-26 13:17:50
0
Jessica Teusaw :
Can we get an update on whether or not this officer ever got any kind of repercussions for his actions? Cuz he’s definitely not right
2025-08-24 13:29:37
38
expose the corrupt :
this is a lawsuit
2025-08-25 10:19:56
28
Hadez :
version Rents.
2025-08-24 10:37:31
16
commakozzy :
Lawsuit coming if not start requesting all that officers records
2025-08-26 23:36:56
1
BandCampWarrior :
The bottom 10% of his HS graduating class 😂
2025-08-26 20:48:28
1
Buddy :
Vaporizer needed
2025-08-27 06:46:35
0
KingGary44 :
no expectation of privacy in public
2025-08-24 17:26:22
13
Turbo :
lawsuit
2025-08-24 17:09:56
7
BAILEY :
This is why we need a much stricter hiring process to be a cop. 😂
2025-08-27 18:03:29
3
Paul Alcendor :
game over for him.
2025-08-24 13:43:02
3
scottkahla :
Professional agitator "lawyering up". clicks and a hopeful lawsuit.
2025-08-24 09:32:13
1
blake_ct :
😳😳😳
2025-08-25 11:05:26
0
Joyce Williams482 :
😁😁😁
2025-10-02 15:45:32
0
King&Story👸🦋 📖 🚦 :
🤣🤣🤣
2025-08-24 06:55:32
0
Daniel Dawley481 :
Wrongful detainment NEEDS to be an automatic 6 months in prison for every officer involved !
2025-08-24 12:26:40
15
rlwilson420_home :
Mandatory training!!! Loss of qualified immunity.
2025-08-24 08:36:36
8
thefaithoffreedom :
18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against rights 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights 42 U.S.C. 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 U.S.C. 1986 Action for neglect to prevent Owen v. Independence. 100 S. C. I. 1398, 445 US622- 445 U.S. 622 (1980) “Officers of the court have no immunity when violating a Constitutional right from liability. For they are deemed to know law!" Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961). In Monroe v. Pape, the Supreme Court held that a police officer could be held liable for violating an individual’s constitutional rights under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which allows individuals to sue government officials for civil rights violations. The U.S. Supreme Court case John Bad Elk v. United States (1900) the Court ruled that a person has the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest, even to the point of using lethal force if necessary for self-defense. This case highlighted the principle that individuals should not be subject to unlawful detention by authorities.
2025-08-24 19:01:29
3
Scotty herring 68 :
He needs to be fired,sued and put in jail for assault
2025-08-24 22:06:33
3
scott :
sue him it helps them learn
2025-08-25 11:49:20
4
Wade :
Officer going enjoy that lawsuit and loss of that immunity
2025-08-25 03:32:46
2
rbouthillette :
2a the cop. it would actually be honorable to the officer if you did that remember the cop is the one that took an oath
2025-08-25 09:38:46
0
Mr-chuckle-nutts :
Buddy your in the wrong the cops not
2025-08-24 07:47:27
1
To see more videos from user @xg_laohao65, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
