@dr.nafaa_alnaeely: ناظور الفقرات الثنائي UBE

د نافع النائلي
د نافع النائلي
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Wednesday 27 August 2025 20:39:25 GMT
3016
192
35
6

Music

Download

Comments

amjadalnasiri4
امجد الناصري :
بالتوفيق انشاءالله
2025-08-28 08:32:28
1
d.y905
عقيل السلطاني :
بارك الله بجهودك دكتور نافع المحترم
2025-10-21 11:46:49
1
mrahmediphonex
دكتورمرام :
الحبيب
2025-09-01 16:46:29
1
zaenab.mahmod
ام زهراء ❤❤ :
🌺🌺🌺🌺
2025-08-27 20:53:10
1
user4468582947361
user4468582947361 :
معدل د.نافع...احسن واحلئ دكتور اللهم يحفظكم جميعا
2025-09-14 14:20:42
1
user3329918013632
حيدر عواد :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-09-12 20:25:33
1
hefdh5
ستار ابو جبار الجحيشي :
كل التوفيق والنجاح الدائم أن شاء الله دكتورنا العزيز
2025-09-03 06:43:12
1
sadiqhussein54
صادق حسين :
بالتوفيق ان شاءالله
2025-08-28 20:34:47
1
user21701491451346
ابو محمد :
موفق دكتور ابن العم
2025-08-28 20:14:51
1
user7726146372115
ابو مصطفى السلطاني :
بالتوفيق دكتور عاشت الايادي
2025-08-28 12:20:22
1
user5251074177867
ابو قاسم الخيكاني :
الله الله يطول بعمرك يا دكتور نافع يا شريف يا بطل ويخليك ذخر لهذا الشعب المزحوق وبارك الله فيك وبارك الله بجهودك والله العظيم انا افتخر بيك يا دكتور ناصر وارحم الوالديك يوميا الف الف رحمه على والديك
2025-08-28 09:42:52
1
useresh8019ma2
وسام :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-08-28 07:53:20
1
user101505554
کرار عادل :
موفق انشاء الله دكتور
2025-08-28 07:14:44
1
userapqb7b4wn5
المهندس :
❤️❤️❤️
2025-08-28 07:14:30
1
eng.hayder.alsult
Eng.hayder alsultany :
موفق دكتور
2025-08-28 07:14:14
1
amiralkhazalialkhazaa
سالم ياعراق :
🌹🌹🌹
2025-08-28 06:40:30
1
user2676005888157
user2676005888157 :
التوفيق والسداد الدائم ان شاء الله
2025-08-28 05:44:59
1
1.ao55
روان علي :
دكتور نافع انسان وطبيب روعه
2025-08-28 05:23:20
1
1.ao55
روان علي :
الله يوفقك
2025-08-28 05:22:45
1
user089349407
حامد الياسري :
❤️❤️❤️
2025-08-27 23:38:37
1
lojainali23
Lolo ali :
🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-08-27 21:32:53
1
hhw885
HUSSEIN JWAD :
كل التوفيق دكتورنا الغالي
2025-08-27 21:30:12
1
hod90hod
O.H.F :
بالتوفيق دكتورنا الغالي🌷
2025-08-27 21:29:43
1
user6193225779797
علي أبو عقيل البركي :
الله يحفظك دكتورنا الغالي
2025-08-28 07:08:07
1
10tfcx
صادق ☆محـ𓅇꙰᭄ــمد :
❤❤
2025-08-27 21:07:46
1
user49039013
محمود أبو اسراء :
بل توفيق يارب العالمين
2025-08-27 20:54:08
1
zaenab.mahmod
ام زهراء ❤❤ :
اني مااروح اي دكتور بس يمك عرفت علاجي
2025-08-27 20:53:46
1
zaenab.mahmod
ام زهراء ❤❤ :
مبدع دكتور
2025-08-27 20:53:19
1
ka.dr9
كاظم :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-08-27 20:46:26
1
52nasser
ناصر شيال :
مبدع
2026-05-10 16:23:27
0
user7759814348105
عبد المهيمن ال عواد :
♥♥♥
2025-12-29 06:46:17
0
manask152
🕯منْآسگ🦋 آلُـــ🎼ـــرۆحٍ💖 :
بالتوفيق 👑 دكتورنا المحترم
2025-11-01 10:30:57
0
user9349107767047
شفاء الشفاء :
بالتوفيق انشاء الله دكتور
2025-08-29 09:37:51
0
To see more videos from user @dr.nafaa_alnaeely, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory

About