janelle
Region: AU
Friday 05 September 2025 18:27:48 GMT
831702
121104
187
4457
Music
Download
Comments
locallybound :
my favourite thing about his character arc is that he is still fundamentally Jamie Tartt. He didn't sacrifice any part of his personality to be a better person
2025-09-10 13:41:08
5218
S☀️nny :
JAMIES ENTIRE CHARACTER ARC IS SOMETHING SUPERMAN WOULD BE SO PROUD OF
2025-09-06 13:00:11
10429
🖤 :
genuinely he was so perfectly written 😭
2025-09-08 12:20:01
3478
Lee :
The moment everyone saw the change in him
2025-09-06 17:36:34
1767
sean :
what season and episode is the first clip
2026-07-03 19:24:49
5
Amber ⁴ (Sirius’ Version) :
the weather is just turning to “maybe i should watch ted lasso again”
2025-09-08 18:22:51
26
kaley :
THE WAY I AM SO EXCITED FOR SEASON 4!!!
2025-09-06 02:43:15
470
Note :
I think Jamie’s redemption arc rivals Zuko from ATLA. Is that crazy?
2025-10-12 14:12:54
190
𝐇𝐚𝐢𝐳𝐣𝐞𝐧 :
Me watching Jamie’s development
2025-09-09 09:47:10
206
Elemsee :
Oh Jamie my sweet prince
2025-09-12 10:48:13
50
ReinerKahl :
Thats my favorite line in the whole series
2025-09-06 20:14:14
279
≽^• ˕ • ྀི≼ :
His character development was so peak
2026-01-26 05:20:19
8
jackiboi123 :
I’VE LOST ME WINGS ROY
2025-09-10 13:53:19
61
Marv :
JAMIE TART YOU FUCKING KING
2025-09-21 08:44:43
42
Samantha 🇵🇸👩❤️💋👩🧠 :
JAMES TARTT SENIOR, WHEN I SEE YOU
2025-09-07 04:11:06
172
hopeb9922 :
His character arc was done so well
2025-09-06 21:18:52
67
nat :
jamie tartt is my sunshine with the best growth i’ve ever seen
2025-09-08 18:31:02
384
Lordcheese :
best character development ever
2025-09-09 18:21:50
31
Mattew :
best character alongside Roy Kent in all Ted Lasso show
2025-09-10 13:58:18
18
lucia 🪩 :
i’m rewatching ted lasso for the first time and every moment hits just as hard as the first time i watched it
2025-09-10 11:32:37
25
Tainom :
Something that always confused me about that scene wss that literally seconds before is that Sam had said that he didn’t expect them to join in but then seemed almost annoyed at Jamie for going along with it.
2025-09-10 16:21:02
98
Kookie⚡️💜 :
PUNK ROCKER x TED LASSO? THIS IS PEAK TIKTOK
2025-10-10 16:32:59
9
ej 🕸️ :
JAMIE TO PUNKROCKER IM SOBBING
2025-09-27 06:58:08
11
Sara :
Jamie my beloved
2025-09-06 16:41:45
15
♡~𝖈𝖔𝖈𝖔~♡ :
Jamie Tartt 😭🩷
2025-09-21 08:02:20
5
To see more videos from user @ridd.ikulus, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![#china Graham's number is a gigantic number that serves as an upper bound for solving a certain problem in Ramsey theory. It is a very large power of three, expressed using Knuth's up-arrow notation. It is named after Ronald Graham. It became known to the general public after Martin Gardner described it in his “Mathematical Games” column in Scientific American in November 1977, where he wrote: “In an unpublished proof, Graham recently established a bound so large that it holds the record as the largest number ever used in a serious mathematical proof.” In 1980, the Guinness Book of Records repeated Gardner’s statements, further increasing public interest in this number. Graham’s number is incomprehensibly larger than other well-known large numbers such as a googol, a googolplex, and even larger than Skewes’ number and Moser’s number. The entire observable universe is far too small to contain the ordinary decimal representation of Graham’s number (assuming each digit occupies at least a Planck volume). Even exponential towers of the form � are useless for this purpose, although the number can be expressed using recursive formulas, such as Knuth’s notation or equivalent methods, which is what Graham did. The last 500 digits of Graham’s number are [source not provided].](/video/cover/7665380144592194836.webp)
