@extendedknowledge: Director of EKSJ – The Evidence Room. Campaigning for justice in family law. Exposing misuse of SGOs & Section 20. Building unity: home → community → world. ⸻ 📖 Professional Bio (for reports, handbooks, formal use) Farrah Thomas is the Director of Extended Knowledge Social Justice (EKSJ) and founder of The Evidence Room, a platform dedicated to exposing systemic failures in family law and safeguarding. Through education, advocacy, and community action, Farrah challenges the misuse of Special Guardianship Orders (SGOs) and Section 20 of the Children Act, while promoting unity as the foundation for justice: “Unity in the home creates unity in the community. Unity in the community creates unity in the world.”#TheEvidenceRoom #JusticeForFamilies #SilentAdoption #Section20 #FamilyRights
EKSJ
Region: GB
Friday 05 September 2025 21:55:11 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
mimi :
Islington local authority used this section to remove my 2 sons and took me to court i didn't sign anything
2025-10-10 21:34:32
1
One Acre :
If the child is placed on a section 20 but it’s after the 13 weeks before they come 18 then they decide to turn it to section 17 because of the age of 18 is that allowed?
2026-04-27 16:35:27
0
Tyler.jh19 :
I put my son on a section 20 when he was born and next day they said that he needed to be on an interim care order because they were worried I was gunna take him out I was like well I put him on it y would I if I know my mental health stops me looking after him and now they trying to get him adopted !!
2025-09-08 17:27:22
2
nylee199 :
can you do one on court guardian please
2025-09-06 01:12:23
3
Vigilante exposing cps uk :
they put my kids up for adoption from birth all cuz I was in care they are nothing but liars
2025-09-26 03:33:35
2
thealgorithmhatesme :
Thank you for sharing such vital information for parents, I had to study this myself in order to aide myself, knowledge is power people ❤️
2025-09-06 09:25:08
2
misshollierosee🪽 :
I have messaged you regarding this. Please help
2025-09-08 06:10:14
0
Red lady :
I do agree with you in some level Section 20 should be explained to parents however if LA request section 20 the threshold is met for the child being at risk if significant harm.
2025-10-01 06:54:25
1
The Hidden Agenda :
POV: Never sign a section 20 history of misuse by services to remove children.
2025-09-06 07:04:21
5
Nikkitaliaviolet :
💖💖
2025-10-05 08:36:15
1
Mel h :
@𝓐𝓲𝓶𝓼👄
2025-09-08 16:33:30
1
nylee199 :
👌👌👌
2025-09-06 01:06:54
1
Red lady :
Not true Southwark judgement
2025-09-29 21:17:43
0
kerryclarkson7 :
These are traps
2025-09-06 01:41:05
1
HoHoHo :
🤑🐍WHY SO MANY SINGLE/MUMS🐍🤑
"Dont Need A Man" [At Home]=NO DAD!
MW/FEM/NARC = Spoilt304Bedhoppers
SMUM = [S 304 M x10SBDs InCUM/DNA - 1"DBD/INV"] = 🤮304BABY + 10BAGS = NO DAD ON BCERT. 1ABORT=10BAGS (rinse&repeat) S 304 [M] 4 LIFE, NARC DONT CARE 4 KIDS JUST FOR SHOW & BENEFITS 🤑 A FAMILY TREE OF SAME OLD 🤡 PROVOKE DA,DV FALSE.A TO CRY WOLF TO POLICE TO GAIN CONTROL OF KIDS & TRAP MONEY 🐍
📢 KIDS/B.DADS GET BCERT/DNA TEST 👁
🤨: CHILD EXPLOITATION & ABUSE🚨
🎅 ME: EX PLAY/YOUTH WORKER/DD🧸
2025-09-06 08:09:02
0
Harriett ✨️⚡️ :
I was told to sign a section 20 voluntary and told that i could retract at any time.
she was taken from hospital on intrim care order, having only done a pre parenting assessment
2025-09-21 09:28:29
1
To see more videos from user @extendedknowledge, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.