@ahmad_jalil12:

Ahmad 🤎✨

Open In TikTok:

Region: IQ

Monday 15 September 2025 04:20:36 GMT

97

30

0

1

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.78MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.78MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.48MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.

To see more videos from user @ahmad_jalil12, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Psalm 23 (I Am Not Alone) #jesus #praisegod #rohanikristen #praiseandworship #rohani_kristen

Psalm 23 (I Am Not Alone) #jesus #praisegod #rohanikristen #praiseandworship #rohani_kristen

Quem não AMA uma ‘brusinha’ nova, né?❤️ #dafiti #tudodafiti

Quem não AMA uma ‘brusinha’ nova, né?❤️ #dafiti #tudodafiti

hope changli doesnt burn her hair off too…🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️ please check @NotZarep as they’ve done changli’s forte stack video first🫶🏻 #changli #changliwutheringwaves #wutheringwaves #wuwa #wutheringwavesgameplay #wuwabattle

hope changli doesnt burn her hair off too…🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️ please check @NotZarep as they’ve done changli’s forte stack video first🫶🏻 #changli #changliwutheringwaves #wutheringwaves #wuwa #wutheringwavesgameplay #wuwabattle

la tan esperada receta de galletas, les juro que son muy ricas

la tan esperada receta de galletas, les juro que son muy ricas

“Protecting the Children”: How a Moral Panic Gets Manufactured to Erase LGBT+ Rights I condemn violence without caveats. But putting a child in front of a camera to “defend the children” is not information; it’s an emotional frame. That frame—simple, binary, urgent—turns rumor into law and private morality into public policy. The viral script is familiar: “my friend was forced…,” “my faith and God…,” “protect the family.” None of that proves a systemic crisis; it normalizes stigma and demands collective punishment. The manipulation playbook 1. Appeal to childhood (moral shield). A minor is made the spokesperson. Anyone who questions the message is labeled “anti-children.” Result: debate is chilled; exclusion is sold as “protection.” 2. Rumor as evidence. “My friend says he was forced.” That’s hearsay used to imply widespread coercion. Democratic response: dates, documents, accountable officials, complaint paths—or it’s propaganda. 3. Unchecked victimhood. “I was forced.” If present, it needs proof. Edits, leading questions, and adult-coded terms (“ideology,” “indoctrination”) often reveal coaching. 4. Religious appeal. Faith is respected as personal belief; it cannot be a public authority to restrict others. 5. False dilemma + scapegoating. “Either the children or trans people.” Safety is not a zero-sum game. 6. Plain folks. The leader performs “average parent” while pushing unproven claims; exclusion is rebranded as “common sense.” What this discourse erases 1. Secularism & non-discrimination. Faith guides families; the State must protect everyone equally. 2. Evidence & real protocols. Schools already have support pathways, informed consent and bans on coercion. 3. People with rights. Trans youth are children. Excluding them “for the children” is a contradiction steeped in stigma. Ethical response (newsrooms, classrooms, policy) • Demand verifiability: who/when/where/which authority. • Distinguish support ≠ coercion; if coercion exists, document and report it. • Respect faith, defend the law: religious freedom yes; imposing dogma by decree, no. • Real protection = evidence: safe coexistence, teacher training, anti-bullying + inclusive bathrooms that ensure privacy for all. • Do not instrumentalize minors: don’t expose faces; critique adults who produce the message. Propaganda checklist (spot it fast) • Adult-coded terms in a child’s mouth. • Cuts right before/after key claims. • Sequence: child → “danger” → “protector” leader. • No names, dates, documents. • “The natural/the family” invoked as if it were law. A different narrative: from fear to dignity • From rumor to proof (document before legislating). • From blame to care (supportive schools, informed families, privacy for all). • From one morality to human rights (the State doesn’t save souls; it guarantees rights). Short video script (45–60s) Hook: “Today we saw a child used as a political shield.” Core: “We hear ‘forced’ without proof and ‘faith’ used to deny rights. That isn’t protection; it’s propaganda. If coercion happened, file it with documents. What we cannot do is weaponize a rumor to criminalize trans women and youth. Religious freedom, yes; equal law for everyone, too.” Close: “Care for all children. Demand evidence, reject fear as policy, and defend safe, dignified spaces for everyone.” Conclusion This narrative doesn’t protect children—it uses them. It erodes civil rights for LGBT+ youth and adults through tender imagery and hardline slogans. The answer isn’t silence; it’s raising the evidentiary bar, upholding secularism, and building policies of care. If your policy needs a scapegoat, it isn’t public policy—it’s propaganda. CTA: If this helps, share, save, and comment respectfully. Defend truth, secularism, and care. #ProtectAllChildren #NoMoralPanic #HumanRights #Secularism #TransRightsAreHumanRights

“Protecting the Children”: How a Moral Panic Gets Manufactured to Erase LGBT+ Rights I condemn violence without caveats. But putting a child in front of a camera to “defend the children” is not information; it’s an emotional frame. That frame—simple, binary, urgent—turns rumor into law and private morality into public policy. The viral script is familiar: “my friend was forced…,” “my faith and God…,” “protect the family.” None of that proves a systemic crisis; it normalizes stigma and demands collective punishment. The manipulation playbook 1. Appeal to childhood (moral shield). A minor is made the spokesperson. Anyone who questions the message is labeled “anti-children.” Result: debate is chilled; exclusion is sold as “protection.” 2. Rumor as evidence. “My friend says he was forced.” That’s hearsay used to imply widespread coercion. Democratic response: dates, documents, accountable officials, complaint paths—or it’s propaganda. 3. Unchecked victimhood. “I was forced.” If present, it needs proof. Edits, leading questions, and adult-coded terms (“ideology,” “indoctrination”) often reveal coaching. 4. Religious appeal. Faith is respected as personal belief; it cannot be a public authority to restrict others. 5. False dilemma + scapegoating. “Either the children or trans people.” Safety is not a zero-sum game. 6. Plain folks. The leader performs “average parent” while pushing unproven claims; exclusion is rebranded as “common sense.” What this discourse erases 1. Secularism & non-discrimination. Faith guides families; the State must protect everyone equally. 2. Evidence & real protocols. Schools already have support pathways, informed consent and bans on coercion. 3. People with rights. Trans youth are children. Excluding them “for the children” is a contradiction steeped in stigma. Ethical response (newsrooms, classrooms, policy) • Demand verifiability: who/when/where/which authority. • Distinguish support ≠ coercion; if coercion exists, document and report it. • Respect faith, defend the law: religious freedom yes; imposing dogma by decree, no. • Real protection = evidence: safe coexistence, teacher training, anti-bullying + inclusive bathrooms that ensure privacy for all. • Do not instrumentalize minors: don’t expose faces; critique adults who produce the message. Propaganda checklist (spot it fast) • Adult-coded terms in a child’s mouth. • Cuts right before/after key claims. • Sequence: child → “danger” → “protector” leader. • No names, dates, documents. • “The natural/the family” invoked as if it were law. A different narrative: from fear to dignity • From rumor to proof (document before legislating). • From blame to care (supportive schools, informed families, privacy for all). • From one morality to human rights (the State doesn’t save souls; it guarantees rights). Short video script (45–60s) Hook: “Today we saw a child used as a political shield.” Core: “We hear ‘forced’ without proof and ‘faith’ used to deny rights. That isn’t protection; it’s propaganda. If coercion happened, file it with documents. What we cannot do is weaponize a rumor to criminalize trans women and youth. Religious freedom, yes; equal law for everyone, too.” Close: “Care for all children. Demand evidence, reject fear as policy, and defend safe, dignified spaces for everyone.” Conclusion This narrative doesn’t protect children—it uses them. It erodes civil rights for LGBT+ youth and adults through tender imagery and hardline slogans. The answer isn’t silence; it’s raising the evidentiary bar, upholding secularism, and building policies of care. If your policy needs a scapegoat, it isn’t public policy—it’s propaganda. CTA: If this helps, share, save, and comment respectfully. Defend truth, secularism, and care. #ProtectAllChildren #NoMoralPanic #HumanRights #Secularism #TransRightsAreHumanRights

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy