No Nonsense Spirituality
Region: US
Monday 22 September 2025 15:59:45 GMT
22213
1788
32
57
Music
Download
Comments
Lucina Spiza :
Are you on rapturetok? Do you think they're experiencing a mass religious psychosis? They're actually getting ready and preparing. I'm worried about family annihilators
2025-09-22 16:13:55
75
downeycrow :
I know you don’t want to be polical, this isn’t. I was very moved emotionally hearing Erika Kirk’s speech yesterday. She talked a lot about her faith and Christian belief. But esp when she evoked Jesus on the cross then quoted Jesus forgiving his executioners came off as real to moi. How dud you respond to speech, if u watched it?
2025-09-22 23:22:08
0
Mels :
objective morality doesnt need a god to exist, that would make it subjective to that god. so if you want objective morality you necessarily have to ignore any god being
2025-09-25 13:25:27
5
catdadrn :
Would you share your thoughts on deontology vs utilitarianism?
2025-09-22 16:12:27
4
wminley :
Do “what is love” next! Same logic? Move toward thriving towards the other?
2025-09-24 16:08:58
1
Mateo Feo :
An interesting thing I’ve seen in claiming that God’s morals are Objective because He made them. But philosophically, subjective means it’s dependent on a mind, in this case God’s mind. But even the standard definition is “influenced by personal opinions”, which in this case again it’s God, so subjective all the way down.
2025-12-16 18:46:06
0
Shongaard :
The book Beyond Virtue has a great argument against emotivism and for rationality, and that rationality for ethics are where strong moral perspectives arise instead of feelings. It does not dismiss feelings, but it avoids having our arguments be just yay or nay to each statement. They must be coherent and cohesive.
2025-09-22 16:12:17
1
Natanael Lizama Bola :
If the first choice is arbitrary then the entire system is arbitrary in its foundation. Also, you don't get universal wellbeing from concrete pleasure as pleasure is always embodied in the I. Have you read Sade or Stirner? This seems very naive to me
2025-09-22 17:50:22
0
jo :
what I also found interesting for me was how I was less able to excuse actions that led to suffering after leaving religion (i.e. not being able to say "God has a plan" - objective reality was just more simple to find morality in.
2025-09-22 23:36:45
5
Alice 🇨🇦 :
Love this!
2025-09-22 16:53:47
0
Mai :
Would love book recommendations that dive deeper into horizontal morality
2025-09-24 12:40:58
1
shan.rdms :
Omg thank you for explaining it this way!! 🙌🏼
2025-09-25 00:52:08
0
🏳️🌈🌻Line🌻🏳️🌈🍉 :
I love how you lay the videos you stitch floating over the library / ceiling. It looks great and is kind of eerie. Also you always cut the most relevant snippets from the video, not to long, not to short. I really appreciate the effort you put into that.
2025-09-22 19:13:46
3
ZFOx :
So fresh
2025-09-22 16:08:57
1
Marie Triplett :
❤️❤️❤
2025-09-23 10:24:42
1
9a in Wonderland :
🦋
2025-09-23 18:59:14
0
Louis Lembcke :
As said, many / most people have a colloquial concept of "moral good" as related to maximizing human wellbeing & agency and minimizing avoidable human suffering - i.e. the quality of our experience. However, Abrahamic theologies have a completely different concept of "moral good" unrelated to human wellbeing vs suffering. Abrahamic theologies employ a "Divine Command Theory" of "morality" whereby ANYTHING / EVERYTHING that god supposedly wants / does / commands is DEFINED as "moral good" WITHOUT regard to human wellbeing or suffering. Per that theology, the concept of "moral good" DOES NOT / CANNOT have any objective meaning independent of that god's whims & nature. So, when followers of that god say "god is good", all they are really saying is that this god character is consistent with its own nature, which is a meaningless tautology and tells us nothing useful about that god's actual values & character. When many followers of that god say "god is good" they mistakenly use their colloquial definition of "moral good" (e.g. pertaining to human wellbeing vs suffering), and they then are faced with obvious contradictions in scripture & reality. They then have to resolve the cognitive dissonance via dishonest mental gymnastics to make excuses for that god's demonstrably horrendous actions / commands. This is an example of how religion (and other dogmatic beliefs, e.g. political / ideological dogmatism) poisons everything - including intellectual & moral integrity.
2025-09-23 00:03:30
1
Max Samaniego :
I absolutely love your account! Do you ever do lives? Kind of like a mass for this anti religion? I would definitely subscribe. Also, what do you think about the movie Heretic?
2025-09-22 16:52:02
1
amandahall4918 :
It does seem that these people struggle because they've never been encouraged to think for themselves and learn by personal experience
2025-09-23 17:45:08
0
MiniMetaphysic👾 :
WHY IS NO ONE TELLING ME WHAT BLUEY DID, I NEED ANSWERS 😂
2025-09-29 17:21:05
2
elle_see :
I work with preschoolers, so I haven’t used the words “good” and “bad” in the sense of morality in years. What I do use is “kind”
2025-11-20 13:14:54
0
Adam.Murphy :
Why do people think that 'objective mortality' is a thing anyway. Morality has always been subjective. Which is why you may have different morals than I do. It is also why religious denominations, and people that practice within the exact same religious denomination, may have different morals as well.
2025-11-06 22:19:53
0
briony :
im capable of puttimg myself in other peoples shoes and i have empath, i just do not want others to hurt ,if i can help with that, i will. organised religion is full of people not capable and or not willing to do that.
2025-11-05 00:41:48
0
Richard :
What would be an example of a more moral country?
2025-10-20 03:51:28
0
To see more videos from user @nononsensespirituality, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
