laSexta Noticias
Region: ES
Wednesday 01 October 2025 15:00:00 GMT
546247
30620
2292
5321
Music
Download
Comments
yeniferperniavale :
PP es el partido más corrupto y mentiroso que hay en España
2025-10-02 14:22:04
2733
George Muñoz :
Además, que te concedan el ingreso mínimo vital es complicadísimo hasta para un español. Bulos por doquier.
2025-10-01 20:00:04
989
Hassan Ly🇬🇳🇪🇸 :
viva pedro Sánchez adelante 10 años mas ❤️✌🏼
2025-10-03 16:06:55
305
Mohamed Breh :
la ayuda es la q cobra r y Abascal y muchos políticos sin dar un palo al agua ni han cautizado ni un día a la seguridad social
2025-10-02 17:26:46
253
Gaviota :
llevo 22 años en España JAMAS ME DIERON NI LOS BUENOS DIAS 😏
2025-10-03 05:49:22
541
kanda kanda :
viva pedro Sánchez y viva España sin vox y sin ayuso
2025-10-04 21:30:16
112
San🌻 :
No sé cómo les cuesta entender a la gente que si no tienes documentación no se les dan ayudas. Si cobran son gente documentada en España.
2025-10-04 14:12:54
27
Fran :
Tienen razón, en España hay gente que cobra ayudas sin dar un palo al agua... el mayor y mejor ejemplo de ello se llama Santiago Abascal
2025-10-26 14:54:46
36
Cesar :
PP corrupto
2025-10-03 02:10:30
64
Francisco Marti Sanchez :
pp igual a corrupción
2025-10-03 02:00:11
198
alexquerol7 :
la derecha siempre igual. y lo peor és que hay mucha gente que se lo cree
2025-10-03 06:29:45
167
Emma Álvarez :
Lo del PP y VOX es crear el caos a toda costa.
2025-10-04 07:16:42
107
Rachid refino :
el PP está acorralado ya no sabe que hacer para ganar votos
2025-10-03 19:44:38
76
R5 :
como se nota que VoX es el aborto político del PP,
2025-10-03 22:03:17
69
𝕯𝖚𝖐𝖊𝖘𝖆♏ :
y como puedes recibir esas ayudas sin papeles?
2025-10-02 12:34:15
57
gelimfernandez :
Hay que demostrarlo.
2025-10-04 06:58:56
46
Maribel Miembro prieto :
El PP el partido más corrupto 😂😂😂😂
2025-10-03 01:10:35
69
Sonia :
gracias por informar 👏👏
2025-10-03 20:01:22
10
Dll987654321 :
como abascalito 😂😂
2025-10-04 17:57:15
14
Tictoking :
El Dato se lo dio Vito 😂🤣
2025-10-03 21:11:16
73
✦˖ ࣪꒰[𝓑]𝐚𝐛𝐲«❣︎🇪🇨🖤🇪🇨 :
MIAMI ME LO CONFIRMO JAJAJAJ😂😂
2025-10-02 01:39:40
90
vela8801 :
y como ya no cala ese mensaje, ahora los nuevos villanos son los jubilados
2025-10-02 08:15:12
46
sach586 :
las ayuditas las cobran los del pp
2025-10-03 14:28:26
277
bsira :
viva pedro Sánchez 👍👍👍👍👍
2025-10-15 22:07:16
136
chairi :
España no teda nada grates
2025-10-02 16:55:43
7
To see more videos from user @lasexta.noticias, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number was used by Ronald Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc... , even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is a very large PEAPO number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital 1,640 representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital 61 representation of Graham's numberwould itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. 315 Nor even can the numberof digits of that number-and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the 289 observable universes. #fyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy #jbe #ethnictok #ethnic #european](/video/cover/7679103230512598302.webp)
