The application of the Texas statute to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers lacked any reasonable suspicion to believe that appellant was engaged or had engaged in criminal conduct. Detaining appellant to require him to identify himself constituted a seizure of his person subject to the requirement of the Fourth Amendment that the seizure be "reasonable." Cf. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1; United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U. S. 873. The Fourth Amendment requires that such a seizure be based on specific, objective facts indicating that society's legitimate interests require such action,
2025-10-03 07:32:35
0
Benji1984 :
Is their ANY requirement for intelligence in police hiring?
2025-10-03 17:37:07
0
To see more videos from user @nqo3duupn3kq, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.