tepsonet
Region: US
Sunday 12 October 2025 03:50:06 GMT
1516
85
1
1
Music
Download
Comments
Scott :
It's all about EGOS and control, and the polices hatred of transparency. This comes from poor training from the top down. Couple that with No liability, no accountability, no trust, no reason to follow the Constitution! this is policing in America
2025-10-16 20:09:38
0
Desertpoint :
😁😁😁
2025-10-17 00:43:24
0
thefaithoffreedom :
The U.S. Supreme Court case John Bad Elk v. United States (1900) the Court ruled that a person has the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest, even to the point of using lethal force if necessary for self-defense. This case highlighted the principle that individuals should not be subject to unlawful detention by authorities. 18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against rights 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights 42 U.S.C. 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 U.S.C. 1986 Action for neglect to prevent Owen v. Independence. 100 S. C. I. 1398, 445 US622- 445 U.S. 622 (1980) “Officers of the court have no immunity when violating a Constitutional right from liability. For they are deemed to know law!" Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961). In Monroe v. Pape, the Supreme Court held that a police officer could be held liable for violating an individual’s constitutional rights under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which allows individuals to sue government officials for civil rights violations.
2025-10-12 18:48:06
1
To see more videos from user @tepsonet, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
