nqo3duupn3kq
Region: US
Monday 13 October 2025 14:16:17 GMT
26889
541
59
4
Music
Download
Comments
CaughterEyes :
and ppl still think the auditors are the problem.
2025-10-13 21:21:20
70
ri :
these guys have something to hide. lawsuit for taking his camera
2025-10-15 04:36:10
21
William Else :
everyone screaming lawsuit. 18 USC § 241 and 18 USC § 242 are the exact laws being violated, but we have yet to see ANY videos of auditors cashing them big paychecks. NOT ONE. what's wrong with that picture?
2025-10-15 15:47:46
0
timgroh826 :
These cops are begging for a lawsuit
2025-10-14 18:42:27
7
Blake Pitre :
EASY MONEY 💰
2025-10-14 02:01:05
10
zanyience :
Part two, please!
2025-10-13 23:32:52
3
D :
thats why they should be live streamed at every interaction
2025-10-15 12:52:29
0
Robert S Zilmer :
Constitutional rights to record the public. No right to privacy in a public space. No right to hinder the public from exercising their right.
2025-10-14 03:36:00
13
clipmaster460 :
dammit! why can't this happen to me!
2025-10-13 18:50:38
4
Wackyfrankie :
Wow they are really not too smart
2025-10-15 06:13:43
0
lvl10323vmd :
who ever he is he has an ego problem
2025-10-14 13:42:05
0
Mike :
Better question is do you want your public records posted? Remember every real estate purchase is public information on the county website
2025-10-14 22:52:11
0
Poppy🤩 :
😂😂😂
2025-10-16 15:58:00
0
thefaithoffreedom :
The U.S. Supreme Court case John Bad Elk v. United States (1900) the Court ruled that a person has the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest, even to the point of using lethal force if necessary for self-defense. This case highlighted the principle that individuals should not be subject to unlawful detention by authorities. 18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against rights 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights 42 U.S.C. 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 U.S.C. 1986 Action for neglect to prevent Owen v. Independence. 100 S. C. I. 1398, 445 US622- 445 U.S. 622 (1980) “Officers of the court have no immunity when violating a Constitutional right from liability. For they are deemed to know law!" Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961). In Monroe v. Pape, the Supreme Court held that a police officer could be held liable for violating an individual’s constitutional rights under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which allows individuals to sue government officials for civil rights violations.
2025-10-13 19:48:31
2
JAMES JACKSON :
Cop broke law
2025-10-14 07:53:28
1
user7772143162686 :
corrupt cops need fired
2025-10-14 17:16:01
0
jay :
hes another dei hire
2025-10-14 20:15:02
0
Bruce Williams55 :
Shut down Gestapo type cops. Inexcusable.
2025-10-18 00:16:14
0
Irish Dad and Irish :
the behavior of these officers is astonishing not understanding the 1st amendment
2025-10-15 08:49:54
0
Steven rough ralph :
🤡🤡
2025-10-15 16:24:40
0
nickholloway9 :
Well, there’s a lawsuit he handed it to you hands-down son and that’s a piece of shit for a cop and he needs to be put in jail. Take everything. The man personally owns and then sue his fucking department because they let the crap go on.
2025-10-14 09:37:37
0
nickholloway9 :
These fucking cops are the criminals. What do you think is gonna happen to them they wind up withdrawing from that police force so they don’t get prosecuted and they go join another police force and do the same shit all over again. The cops are the criminals.
2025-10-14 09:40:57
0
Mei Thunder Fluff 𓆩♡𓆪 :
fire them and put them in jail
2025-10-18 01:28:56
0
JoeyStones26 :
sue them
2025-10-13 23:14:55
0
To see more videos from user @nqo3duupn3kq, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
