I’m confused because this is literally just IRAC with a counter argument? How were you writing before this??
2025-10-16 10:34:21
660
wildcats40508 :
Retired law professor. This is exactly what needs to be done. If law school essay questions are written correctly there will be facts in which you can answer the conclusion is "A" and facts in which the conclusion is "B." Law school should teach the student that in the law there is always two ways to see an argument. The sooner a student understands this the sooner they will do better on their exams.
2025-10-16 00:27:33
2697
Alex :
IRAC is harboring weapons of mass instruction.
2025-10-15 20:58:25
104
dave. :
it’s fr just a counter analysis and a rebuttal of that counter analysis. Legal writing 101.
2025-10-15 22:46:23
439
Roxanne wright :
if youre not doing this genuinely idk what ur doing
2025-10-15 23:31:06
353
Kelly :
My professors all want different things, it’s really rough.
2025-10-16 03:34:58
71
gibney888 :
good advice, I made a similar switch to this in 2L and it really improved my grades
2025-10-15 20:39:59
172
Jacob :
I just passed the bar and i still watched lmao
2025-10-16 16:48:15
73
Odiliya :
I fear this is common sense
2025-11-12 04:02:35
21
Brittany Mahaffey :
You wanna help me with my IRAC paper hahah
2025-10-16 03:16:47
0
anonpd :
But then you have to remember plaintiff vs defendant 🤣🤣
2025-10-15 16:55:37
143
not jada :
This feels so intuitive and that’s very comforting
2025-10-15 21:56:30
43
elisabeth :
i did a practice exam that way and my prof hated it 😭 but i think it works if you don’t try to stretch a side that clearly does not have a valid argument
2025-10-15 21:59:24
18
Logan :
Is there any other way to do it? Lol
2025-10-16 20:46:31
9
Ar16j_ :
This exactly how they want analysis on the Florida bar too
2025-10-15 22:10:28
26
Maddie Mae :
good advice for when you have the time to 😭 sometimes it’s all about just getting down the main argument with the time you have
2025-10-16 01:20:32
15
Madeline :
Do you say “will most likely” or just will
2025-10-16 00:15:34
7
Cassidy Champlin :
This is true but also know what your professor wants. I have one professor that always says “pick one side and argue it in your essays. I don’t want to be hearing both sides.”
2025-10-16 15:46:22
5
leroyvzn :
Bro my contract exam was two days ago
2025-11-22 20:03:59
1
user582319 :
Yep. This the right way. Some say it’s common sense but many people don’t do it!!!
2025-11-13 16:21:33
3
Cassidy Bryan :
I truly don’t think there’s another way to do it, to the point I’m concerned that people might not be doing this. I don’t understand what the alternative is, not even trying to be snarky.
2025-11-02 22:26:43
1
frannfrost :
Bro I don’t even know the content how can I even answer a law school exam ?. I’m going to fail out
2025-10-16 05:41:59
2
A.K. :
Will defendant argue there is “no contract” because the SOF applies, or will they argue the contract is unenforceable because the SOF applies? How much of your analysis focuses on the SOF as an affirmative defense vs an outright denial?
2025-10-16 03:51:22
1
Jordan💪🏻⚖️ | legallysculpted :
Yes this!!
2025-11-13 06:23:04
1
Black Elle Woods :
how do you frame such a details break down under timed conditions
2025-10-16 02:16:03
4
To see more videos from user @jackteacheslawschool, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.