tre
Region: US
Thursday 16 October 2025 02:04:53 GMT
1102566
131937
540
6060
Music
Download
Comments
vivi 𓏲𝄢 :
fun fact: her sword is based off a real sword from india called the urumi [happy]
2025-10-31 11:18:55
6318
Deadpoets 🦄🩷 :
She's easily top 5 hashira people are just too misogynistic to see it .
2025-11-06 16:46:23
7651
🇨🇮 :
Fun fact her breathing style is one lf the most dangerous for slayers cuz you need to dodge ur own attack
2025-11-08 08:26:03
3549
𖤍 :
Her sword vs Daki’s obi sashes would have been such a cool fight to watch ngl
2025-11-08 05:27:35
1581
𝒮Kurta :
How can ppl hate this cutie 🥹
2025-11-06 17:29:07
1986
blush :
Top 5 easy.
2025-11-09 18:30:30
530
Frxst :
She has the most impressive fighting style by far
2025-10-17 01:15:37
1198
الدکتورة مـيـريّ 𝜗ৎ :
Mitsuri strongest female in kny
2025-11-08 19:02:31
370
[ping] Sun :
She was nerfed in the final ark btw
2025-11-18 12:57:02
49
BatInnaBox :
Inm never getting over that she created her OWN breathing style, THATS SOME QUEEN SHT RIGHT THERE 🩷🩷🩷
2025-10-21 04:00:12
566
ruthlessgain :
FOR HOURSSSSSS SHE FOUGHT FOR HOURSSSSSS
2025-11-11 14:34:28
415
Alan Targaryen :
Top 3/4 In base Top 4/3 with mark
2025-11-08 08:16:48
17
🇸🇦 :
ahhhh I love her
2025-11-08 11:25:17
569
Michael :
2025-10-16 02:15:31
315
reryjj 🪭 :
I love when people edit her like this ufff
2025-11-07 16:25:55
54
Sara :
BEST WOMAN.
2025-11-08 03:47:01
50
|White| :
That's right.
2025-11-09 09:56:30
70
ℬ𝓁ℯ𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓃𝓰💤 :
the fact thay she has to avoid her own attacks to prevent from hurting herself
2025-11-08 08:32:08
73
moonlitsky1101 :
MY QUEEN
2025-11-10 23:42:24
27
chrisrejo :
Mitsuri editers pls continue to use tuff audios 😭🙏
2025-10-20 07:59:35
139
:
oh the pillar of love stands unmatched
2025-10-16 22:50:11
91
gyattgyattgyatt :
if only the author knew how to write her 💔
2025-11-08 16:29:10
231
MeowMeowpurrz :
2025-10-24 04:21:33
66
Dani. :
These type of edits are better then the ones who only edit her running and her just her body. 😭🙏
2025-11-13 04:32:22
19
chudette :
Easily top 5
2025-11-08 16:21:41
26
To see more videos from user @aonungstoy, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Come and See (1985) edit #iqmaxx Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #larp #sinister #tlpur #333](/video/cover/7660179197603761439.webp)
