@copstalk008: #police #copsoftiktok #law #lawyer #audit

copstalk11
copstalk11
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 16 October 2025 15:09:20 GMT
11599
249
34
6

Music

Download

Comments

roadglide_13
Ron Begley :
being trespassed from Walmart you have to provide ID. they can trespass you for whatever reason they wish. no crime need be committed
2025-10-16 17:04:38
6
chrisspencer239
chrisspencer239 :
No crime , not even suspicion of a crime. Officers can ask for ID during their investigation but they have no legal basis to demand it.
2025-10-16 15:25:37
20
shineonyoucrazydiamondpf
Tik Toker :
How does he find these? I'd like this attorney to explain trespassing in detail. the attorney, not the comments. can a place preemptively trespass some. like in an email? seriously
2025-11-15 15:44:50
0
robert.scott440
robert scott :
easy lawsuit
2025-10-17 18:41:21
1
audiogeek19585
Audiogeek1958 :
go to Walmart . this is racial profiling. the cops are racially profiling. and the lawsuit both Walmart and the cops will lose
2025-11-10 05:17:44
0
massai0423
massaí :
😩 not good😑this is all bad from thr start…
2025-10-19 03:27:35
1
wayneking618
wayneking618 :
I hope he sues
2025-10-17 04:58:49
0
shineonyoucrazydiamondpf
Tik Toker :
it's on tape. If she lied to police that's wrong. ID on private property.I love "do an invesigation" What a concept, investigate before escalating
2025-11-15 15:42:14
0
randygarza273
RGARZA :
NO CRIME NO ID!
2025-10-16 16:52:30
7
captainsuds18
captainsuds1 :
Sue Walmart
2025-10-16 19:58:07
3
the_punisher_2025
ThePunisher2025 :
I really believe they hire the barely high school educated people to be tyrant that they can’t even figure out a trespass law. He was never asked to leave if they wanna ban him. That’s a private matter. Please have no part in it because he did not break the law he did not refuse to leave the propertybecause he’s never asked to leave the property. I feel sorry for the taxpayers cause they’re gonna be paying a large sum of money and also they should go after Walmart and that person causes whole problem personally.
2025-10-17 01:09:19
0
corvette138
corvette :
😳😳😳
2025-10-18 20:07:08
0
audiogeek19585
Audiogeek1958 :
absolutely tell her to mind her business. she has no idea that she broke the law
2025-11-10 05:15:09
0
dianewilliams61
Diane Williams :
stop going to that hell hole
2025-10-17 12:43:56
0
nilla1075
nilla1075 :
Cops like this need to be retrained with no pay. They just want to hurt innocent people. They want to act so bad, send them to 3rd world country and see how many people they take down.
2025-10-19 03:08:48
0
thefaithoffreedom
thefaithoffreedom :
The U.S. Supreme Court case John Bad Elk v. United States (1900) the Court ruled that a person has the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest, even to the point of using lethal force if necessary for self-defense. This case highlighted the principle that individuals should not be subject to unlawful detention by authorities. 18 U.S.C. 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law 18 U.S.C. 241 Conspiracy against rights 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil action for deprivation of rights 42 U.S.C. 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 U.S.C. 1986 Action for neglect to prevent Owen v. Independence. 100 S. C. I. 1398, 445 US622- 445 U.S. 622 (1980) “Officers of the court have no immunity when violating a Constitutional right from liability. For they are deemed to know law!" Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961). In Monroe v. Pape, the Supreme Court held that a police officer could be held liable for violating an individual’s constitutional rights under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which allows individuals to sue government officials for civil rights violations.
2025-10-16 15:59:31
3
steves156
steve s :
Walmart has money sue them for slander
2025-10-16 20:55:12
2
zaimokoya
zaimokoya :
boycott Walmart
2025-10-17 13:38:38
1
bettle90
user949846505191 :
Sue Walmart and the cops
2025-10-17 21:41:16
0
To see more videos from user @copstalk008, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About