Also, if they don’t have reference panels for our ancestors who they say are extinct (Black European Moors, Southeastern American Tribes), they will tie DNA to what matches closest and statistical probability. My European and African results varies based on the site, so continental results can very well be inaccurate and changed. It’s funny when these people don’t understand these concepts and think DNA is tied to a land mass and not man made political labels and narrative..smh
2025-10-26 20:58:12
33
Mavreen17 :
This is what I've been saying for a long time. I've seen DNA results pivot over time to now saying for example that most black Jamaicans have high level of Nigerian ancestry when this doesn't add up. After I deleted my data from one commercial genealogy site it said that DNA results were for information purposes only, ie totally inaccurate.
2025-10-26 21:45:31
17
SatoshiBanks :
Most global DNA databases include only a very small portion of African genetic information, with less than 2% of the data coming from people of African descent. The vast majority of samples are from people of European ancestry(86%). Because of this, there’s a real chance that DNA segments coming from African origins get mislabeled as European or another non-African group. This happens because the technology and reference data behind ancestry tests are mostly built on European samples, so unique African genetic patterns may go unrecognized.
This leads to situations where ancestry results show too much European ancestry for people with African roots, simply because the rare African patterns don’t match anything in the system. Sometimes, DNA shared between Africans and Eurasians from ancient migrations is credited to Europe, just because that’s where it appears in the existing database. To clear up these mistakes and get more accurate ancestry results, much more African genetic data needs to be collected and studied. Until that happens, anyone with African heritage might get incomplete or even inaccurate ancestry reports, with some so-called “European” segments actually tracing back to African origins that aren’t properly documented yet.
2025-10-27 06:03:29
0
❌️ LadyP ❌️ :
Yes! That was me. I had zero population matches with any of the African groups. I had very close matches with Scottish and Irish groups. So they just assigned me to every area of Africa except North Africa, with no actual match smh. And that's when I knew these tests are bunk.
2025-10-31 13:47:52
10
Lisa :
If American Tribes (Melanted)North and South never gave dna samples for there Database I think those Dna Companies should put that in bold letters because many people are being mislead. They only have Asian/Mongolian stock tribes for America so it automatically kicks it to Westafrica
2025-10-29 06:45:44
2
💋Tryfifii Kalii💋 :
I'm having a hard time finding the single population matches/single population sharing. I don't see an option to select it. maybe I'm in the wrong area.
2025-10-30 09:31:58
2
alandenson0 :
You should ask yourself this question; "Why is it that when you go to Surinam in South America you encounter people that use Yoruba and other African languages in their everyday practices? Not Spanish, not Dutch, not "indigenous languages" but Yoruba.
2025-10-29 11:09:02
1
FeliciaNoIntroduction 🪶👑🇺🇸 :
Well I be damn
2025-11-17 12:39:47
1
FeliciaNoIntroduction 🪶👑🇺🇸 :
@user25327100954005
2025-11-17 23:36:09
0
Catnapman :
💯💯💯
2025-10-29 02:59:29
0
Catnapman :
🔥🔥🔥
2025-10-29 12:22:36
0
👑 :
@Caroline Jones 😩
2025-10-29 11:07:17
0
karamal Beauty :
thru can't fathom the truth even if you show them or explain it
2025-12-06 10:10:10
1
Original Man | Solutions :
dna tests are like a standardized tests. they can't define robust intelligence of various people, let alone creative ability (admixtures). not only are the dna tests limited but the they are also inherently biased.
2025-10-27 13:39:32
5
alandenson0 :
Where is your paper published? Has it been peer reviewed?
2025-10-29 11:10:09
2
Original Man | Solutions :
@ms.nebraska
2025-10-27 13:41:37
2
💋Tryfifii Kalii💋 :
🤔🤔🤔
2025-10-30 08:52:37
0
🪶IAI🪶 Prove me wrong 🪶🪶 :
Yes — it is historically accurate to say that millions of Indigenous-descended people were reclassified as “Negro” over centuries.
This includes:
• Indigenous people enslaved and deported
• Indigenous nations forced into “colored” categories
• Mixed African–Indigenous communities
• Tribal groups erased by states
• Individuals labeled “Negro” to deny land, status, and rights
This is why so many African American families:
• have Indigenous ancestry that DNA tests miss
• have Indigenous oral histories
• have ancestors labeled “mulatto” or “colored”
• have surnames linked to tribal areas
• share culture or phenotype with Native peoples
2025-12-05 18:08:45
0
SB Way of FitTok 💪🏾 :
This is why they want Black Americans to take these test I feel their trying to actually research it to actually name an categorize it.
2025-12-17 10:41:22
0
To see more videos from user @truenorthawakening, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.