CopUSA
Region: US
Friday 31 October 2025 12:36:46 GMT
7397
69
14
3
Music
Download
Comments
luvine4 :
He created a reason abusing his power, don’t have a reason to come out
2025-10-31 16:03:19
2
KUJHAC :
He said “ i’m trying to do this as safely and inconveniently for you as possible”😂🤣 Inconveniently
2025-10-31 22:13:34
1
shinobi420xx :
but Pennsylvania v. Mimms also protects the passenger in a situation like this. the case law also states that the traffic stop starts and ends with the driver unless they witness the passenger specifically commit a crime in their presence.
2025-10-31 14:39:34
3
Brock man of the people :
We never see the end of these videos
2025-10-31 15:55:03
1
shinobi420xx :
if we're talking about case law here's one that officers love citing, Pennsylvania v. Mimms which lawfully gives officers permission to remove the driver from the vehicle on grounds of "officer safety". it's often abused and usually cited when the individual either invokes his 4th or 5th amendment or questions authority.
2025-10-31 14:37:17
0
shinobi420xx :
the case law that the Sergeant cites has nothing to do with what they are attempting. California v. Lee is case law about a traffic stop where officers illegally searched a car and found narcotics and a firearm which long story short Lee won an appeal that suppressed that evidence due to it being obtained illegally. that's literally all that case law states
2025-10-31 14:34:57
0
Jarhead324 :
She is not part of the stop.
2025-10-31 16:32:45
1
dfiss3 :
then what is the case? law not give me a date. give me the actual case
2025-10-31 17:14:05
1
dfiss3 :
oh FYI, he has legal permission already to search you and to search your vehicle at least within anywhere you can reach
2025-10-31 17:15:05
0
cris27 :
Talk about privilege
2025-10-31 15:27:18
0
Ephraim :
not much pisses me of more than"because I said so"
2025-10-31 16:00:45
1
user7506129495942 :
It’s all just a power trip
2025-10-31 21:32:30
0
Alan :
Yes, the principle of Pennsylvania v. Mimms applies to passengers, meaning police can order them out of a lawfully stopped vehicle for officer safety, as later clarified and extended by the Supreme Court in Maryland v. Wilson. This is a minimal intrusion justified by the increased risk to officers when multiple people are in a car, outweighing a passenger's reduced expectation of privacy in public
2025-11-01 00:07:28
0
To see more videos from user @quinquin.dk.kh.vn, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
