Abdul El-Sayed
Region: US
Thursday 06 November 2025 17:55:10 GMT
7305
1031
25
82
Music
Download
Comments
Staci :
U of M bought Sparrow Health System a few years after bought up a bunch of small hospitals. I'm pretty sure this is the end game
2025-11-07 03:15:38
16
grkulak :
Absolutely, I’ve been promoting this since 1985…
2025-12-21 13:37:28
0
billbenson6 :
Terrible! Profit and value shouldn't factor into who gets healthcare.
2025-12-01 16:32:33
0
tritfit :
People, wake up. It’s time to elect those who care about people and have solutions. Both parties are making people fight each other and rule over them. This is the wealthiest country in the world, yet people still can’t afford to live, get health care, get an education, or afford food.
2025-11-08 16:56:23
1
Rik :
Medicare only covers hospital visits and we do not have enough hospitals to allow for people to go in to get treated for a cold. Hospitals are for emergency care not to see a doctor. Why not stop allowing hospitals to run as for profit entities?
2025-12-30 14:43:45
0
User273920272018 :
Corewell!! $34k for outpatient 1 hour procedure
2025-12-26 21:51:02
0
sushai99 :
He has my vote!
2025-12-16 14:12:58
2
apzpw :
YES! #Medicare4AllNOW
2025-12-20 17:29:01
1
MaymoTheFirst U4V :
I hope you’re elected. You will work for Michigan and the USA. Not a foreign country. Vote for NON AIPAC!
2025-12-19 17:27:57
1
Alli🌴Coastal Florida Life☀️🌊 :
Premedica health sold the real estate and guess what wants to come in…. Data centers.
2025-11-07 09:29:33
4
rw-G7 :
Truth!!!
2025-11-07 17:00:29
2
Mel🌸 :
I’m voting for you!
2025-11-07 13:31:41
4
Ginger - The Standard 🫚 :
2028
2025-11-07 16:05:56
0
Frampy Frumpnaks :
algorithm
2025-11-07 00:22:15
0
Mahmoud :
💯💯💯
2025-11-09 00:54:23
1
Abdul :
👏👏👏
2025-11-06 19:31:40
3
The Anarchist Agreement :
💯
2025-11-21 04:58:26
0
Andrea Stone715 :
👍👍👍
2025-11-07 06:49:33
0
oh :
💖💖💖
2025-11-07 01:34:44
0
Staci :
🥰
2025-11-08 02:52:35
0
Kk :
👍
2025-11-10 05:33:09
0
Ever (They/Them) 🍉 :
A certain not for profit that rhymes with sporewell made the largest system in Michigan and has since been selling off their employees to the highest bidders and outsourcing and contracting those folks. It's sickening.
2025-11-06 18:10:55
8
margo_ :
Just googled to see if I can vote for Abdul and NO I CANNOT 🤬🤬🤬 but I can donate and boost his videos. 💙💙💙
2025-11-11 20:39:34
0
winstonforcongress.com :
Many voters genuinely want reform. They want money out of politics. They want representatives who won’t sell out to donors. But every cycle since Citizens United in 2010, they are presented with a familiar storyline: the “firebrand” freshman Democrat who promises to challenge the system, push back against corporate influence, and fight for progressive priorities. Voters respond with hope. They invest emotionally in the idea that this one might finally break through. Then Congress opens for business. And the pattern repeats. A freshman has no power inside the Democratic caucus. They are immediately required to fall in line with donor priorities and leadership expectations. They must attend call-time. They must meet fundraising quotas. They must vote with leadership. Their agenda disappears on day one, and the voters who believed in them watch the same cycle unfold again. At some point, this becomes a form of unresolved cognitive dissonance. Voters know the system runs on donor control, but they keep trying to fix it by electing candidates who are structurally incapable of resisting that control. The hope feels good. The betrayal feels familiar. The cycle becomes comfortable, even when it produces nothing. This is not stupidity. This is human nature under institutional pressure. But it does mean voters are being drawn into a repetitive pattern where their beliefs and their actions no longer match. Each cycle becomes a “reset button” that delays real change. Breaking this pattern requires something new: A candidate who cannot be absorbed by the donor system because they did not enter through it. A representative who does not owe allegiance to the DCCC, the donor class, or party leadership. A candidate who does not need to betray voters on day one, because nothing in their campaign depends on donor expectations. For the first time, voters have a way to align their actions with their long-stated principles: Zero donors. Zero obligations. Zero betrayal. Each congressional district can demonstrate that voters no longer need to live in the gap between what they want from their democracy and what the donor system forces on them.
2025-12-04 23:23:23
0
Chai_All_Day :
Welcome to capitalism. No wait for them to tell you how bad socialism is
2025-11-06 22:31:27
4
To see more videos from user @abdulelsayed, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
