BelleTheLawyer
Region: GB
Wednesday 19 November 2025 15:51:26 GMT
26565
2958
108
112
Music
Download
Comments
Jacob - Papa Seahorse 🏳️⚧️🍉 :
I'm glad she was successful, but it feels like a small amount for the discrimination she experienced. still, a positive precedent has been set.
2025-11-20 08:58:36
556
user118362421513 :
The Supreme Court enabled discriminatory behavior
2025-11-20 06:20:29
255
Lionel Harrison :
Interesting, considering the extent to which the Supreme Court tied itself into a pretzel over this. Thanks, Belle.✌️
2025-11-19 18:28:23
96
00_Imran_7 :
no way I work for RM it's rife with bullying
2025-11-20 11:36:28
25
gxrlboi :
having to rep yourself in a tribunal is no small feat, I'm so glad she was successful
2025-11-20 11:28:53
90
gooseSimulator9 :
It’s always been the case that perception of a characteristic is equal is having that characteristic no? Supreme Court ruling means nothing for that
2025-11-20 10:37:44
16
GargoyleQueen :
She did so well. It's a great decision 💜
2025-11-20 14:10:01
31
Mo.ursa :
I feel like this is absolutely common sense. there will always be people with a bias who will wilfully, in ignorance, claim the supreme court ruling as support.
2025-11-20 11:21:25
4
_m4hf :
Welcome back sunshine, it’s been a while
2025-11-19 22:58:57
8
lewisaaron :
This actually happened recently in the US too under the conservative Supreme Court, believe it or not… they told their employer they were transitioning and took time off work, came back to work after transitioning and then was fired. She won the case that she was discriminated against but sadly she had already passed away but still won the case posthumously- Her name was Aimee Stephens.
2025-11-28 13:26:43
1
The All Rounder Nurse :
You could say Royal Mail failed to deliver
2025-11-21 05:49:17
5
JAMES 🇬🇧 :
excellent and reassuring
2025-11-20 13:17:03
2
Fox Mullder 🇵🇸 :
As an ex postie I’d be so disgusted with those that did this to her if I was working there too , so glad she won this case
2025-11-20 20:04:26
4
Who let the boss out? :
This should be the case anyway. 1. Equality Act has Gender Reassignment as a protected characteristic. Regardless. 2. Perception clauses, just like in the Racial and Religious Hatred Act, are indeed those perceived by the victim, not can reasonable be expected of the perpetrator. Neither changed after the SC ruling. What did happen, is Intersex people were disenfranchised. I wonder when that will be tested.
2025-11-24 23:15:39
1
Freddie :
this is awesome, thank you for sharing and explaining this case. I hope others will see this and be able to use it to defend their rights
2025-11-20 12:02:31
2
xara :
excellent news 🫶🏻
2025-11-20 16:40:01
1
Mel :
Congratulations to her
2025-11-20 17:50:14
1
Jarvis23713 :
this is good to hear
2025-11-20 15:43:48
1
pseudointellectualistt :
Men’s Mental Health Awareness matters
2025-11-19 16:44:09
7
Bianca154 :
👏Congratulations to Sophie👏🏳️⚧️
2025-11-20 15:03:03
1
Nick :
Why was the named colleague not immediately dismissed? Had it been a cis woman, we all know they would have been.
2025-11-23 23:08:28
0
ken78280 :
Is she leaving
2025-11-20 12:48:00
0
dils_jf :
Royal Mail …. They made me work when I was physically not able to walk as they threatened me with firing me. Is there anything I can do. Mangers treated us like dogs because we was agency workers
2025-12-22 03:26:33
0
Althea :
so they can get out of consequence by stating that they don't see her as a womaan
2025-11-20 13:15:41
0
Yvonne Butler :
That was made clear in the Supreme Court ruling.
2025-11-20 19:26:58
0
To see more videos from user @bellethelawyer, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
