@thepacificpals: Behold the western green toad, a tiny desert survival expert! These spotted amphibians live in some of the driest parts of the Southwest by spending most of the year underground, waiting for summer storms. When the rain hits, they leap into action, feeding, calling and breeding in short-lived puddles. They are small, tough and brilliantly adapted, proving that amphibians can thrive even where water is rare…as long as there is a sensible jacuzzaroo to chill in (according to Elsie.) @Aquarium of the Pacific 🦭

The Pacific Pals
The Pacific Pals
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 24 November 2025 18:16:42 GMT
8959
947
11
39

Music

Download

Comments

cassandraz27
CassandraZeller :
i love your content. i think that's the kind of content that needs to be translate and spread everywhere, like for kids ^^
2025-11-24 21:56:52
11
cocoachuffs
Chelsea :
“That wasn’t sensitive” 😭
2025-11-24 18:23:46
10
mushroom_081
Mushroom :
First😎😎😎
2025-11-24 18:21:09
2
frostbiteb82
Christopher Mendez :
I honestly wonder if the animals feel the uncanny valley when they look at the puppets 😭
2025-11-25 05:03:58
4
maxscottstv
MaxScotts TV | Variety Show :
I don’t know what new phrase I enjoy more, wedgie head or jacuzzaroo! 😂❤️
2025-11-24 22:58:21
1
lunticasystem
LunticaSystem :
he's taking a big sip, cause amphibians drink through their skin!
2025-12-23 19:39:29
0
faeriefries_studio
faeriefries_studio :
Jacuzzaroo has entered the chat 📖 👓
2025-11-24 22:23:25
4
To see more videos from user @thepacificpals, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

**Graham's number** ($G$) is an immensely large integer that arose as an upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory (a branch of combinatorics). Discovered by mathematician Ronald Graham in 1977, it was once recognized by the *Guinness Book of World Records* as the largest explicit positive integer ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so large that it cannot be written in conventional notation, sci-notation, or power towers. It is far larger than physical quantities like the number of Planck volumes in the observable universe ($\sim 10^{185}$). --- ## The Mathematical Origin Graham’s number connects to a problem involving hypercubes (higher-dimensional cubes): > Connect all pairs of vertices of an $n$-dimensional hypercube to form a complete graph $K_{2^n}$. Color every edge either red or blue. What is the smallest dimension $n$ such that **every** possible 2-coloring guarantees at least one single-color 4-vertex coplanar subgraph? Ronald Graham proved that such a dimension exists and established an upper bound to bound the problem. That upper bound is Graham's number. *(Note: The actual bound needed for the problem is believed to be much smaller—mathematicians suspect it could be as small as 13, but Graham's number was the upper limit proven mathematically at the time.)* --- ## How Graham's Number Is Constructed To express Graham's number, standard exponential notation fails. Instead, it uses **Knuth's up-arrow notation**: * **1 Arrow (Exponentiation):** $$3 \uparrow 3 = 3^3 = 27$$ * **2 Arrows (Tetration - Power Towers):** $$3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow (3 \uparrow 3) = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$ * **3 Arrows (Pentation):** $$3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow (3 \uparrow\uparrow 3) = \underbrace{3^{3^{3^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot^3}}}}}}_{7,625,597,484,987 \text{ threes}}$$ This forms a power tower of 3s that is over 7.6 trillion 3s high. --- ### The 64-Step Sequence Graham's number ($G$) is defined using a recursive sequence of 64 levels ($g_1, g_2, \dots, g_{64}$): 1. **Level 1 ($g_1$):** $$g_1 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow (3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3)$$ *(This value alone vastly exceeds the total number of subatomic particles in the observable universe.)* 2. **Level 2 ($g_2$):** $$g_2 = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_1 \text{ arrows}} 3$$ *(The number of arrows in level 2 is equal to the full value of $g_1$.)* 3. **Level 3 ($g_3$):** $$g_3 = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_2 \text{ arrows}} 3$$ 4. **Iterate until Level 64 ($g_{64}$):** $$G = g_{64} = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_{63} \text{ arrows}} 3$$ --- ## Mind-Boggling Scale & Properties * **Information Density Limit:** Trying to store all the digits of Graham's number in your head would require so much information density that your brain would collapse into a black hole. * **Known Digits:** Although we cannot write out the entire number, modulo arithmetic allows us to determine its final digits. The last 10 digits of Graham's number are: $$\dots 2464195387$$ #grahamnumbers #truecringecommunnity #kerchpolytechniccollege
**Graham's number** ($G$) is an immensely large integer that arose as an upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory (a branch of combinatorics). Discovered by mathematician Ronald Graham in 1977, it was once recognized by the *Guinness Book of World Records* as the largest explicit positive integer ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It is so large that it cannot be written in conventional notation, sci-notation, or power towers. It is far larger than physical quantities like the number of Planck volumes in the observable universe ($\sim 10^{185}$). --- ## The Mathematical Origin Graham’s number connects to a problem involving hypercubes (higher-dimensional cubes): > Connect all pairs of vertices of an $n$-dimensional hypercube to form a complete graph $K_{2^n}$. Color every edge either red or blue. What is the smallest dimension $n$ such that **every** possible 2-coloring guarantees at least one single-color 4-vertex coplanar subgraph? Ronald Graham proved that such a dimension exists and established an upper bound to bound the problem. That upper bound is Graham's number. *(Note: The actual bound needed for the problem is believed to be much smaller—mathematicians suspect it could be as small as 13, but Graham's number was the upper limit proven mathematically at the time.)* --- ## How Graham's Number Is Constructed To express Graham's number, standard exponential notation fails. Instead, it uses **Knuth's up-arrow notation**: * **1 Arrow (Exponentiation):** $$3 \uparrow 3 = 3^3 = 27$$ * **2 Arrows (Tetration - Power Towers):** $$3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow (3 \uparrow 3) = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$ * **3 Arrows (Pentation):** $$3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow (3 \uparrow\uparrow 3) = \underbrace{3^{3^{3^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot^3}}}}}}_{7,625,597,484,987 \text{ threes}}$$ This forms a power tower of 3s that is over 7.6 trillion 3s high. --- ### The 64-Step Sequence Graham's number ($G$) is defined using a recursive sequence of 64 levels ($g_1, g_2, \dots, g_{64}$): 1. **Level 1 ($g_1$):** $$g_1 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow (3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3)$$ *(This value alone vastly exceeds the total number of subatomic particles in the observable universe.)* 2. **Level 2 ($g_2$):** $$g_2 = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_1 \text{ arrows}} 3$$ *(The number of arrows in level 2 is equal to the full value of $g_1$.)* 3. **Level 3 ($g_3$):** $$g_3 = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_2 \text{ arrows}} 3$$ 4. **Iterate until Level 64 ($g_{64}$):** $$G = g_{64} = 3 \underbrace{\uparrow \uparrow \dots \dots \uparrow}_{g_{63} \text{ arrows}} 3$$ --- ## Mind-Boggling Scale & Properties * **Information Density Limit:** Trying to store all the digits of Graham's number in your head would require so much information density that your brain would collapse into a black hole. * **Known Digits:** Although we cannot write out the entire number, modulo arithmetic allows us to determine its final digits. The last 10 digits of Graham's number are: $$\dots 2464195387$$ #grahamnumbers #truecringecommunnity #kerchpolytechniccollege

About