@philosophyminis: There is a tool to tell if something is nonsense or not. It's a tool to call out the quacks, the charlatans, and the snake oil peddlers of the world. It's a tool to tell pseudoscience from real. And it goes back to Karl Popper, whose ‘falsification’ theory is now a bedrock of the scientific method. According to falsification, a theory is only as strong as how far it can resist falsifying evidence. Empirical experiments cannot prove or verify a theory, only disprove it. The theory of gravity is such a strong theory because for however many plates we've dropped over the centuries, gravity will stubbornly persist in breaking them. So, if we call something a ‘working theory,’ that simply means that all experiments since it was presented haven't shown it to be wrong yet. But if a theory cannot be logically falsified, or if no possible evidence could disprove it, then Popper dismissed it as nonsense — a criticism he quite aggressively aimed at Hegel, Marx and Freud. For instance, if you find a man who seemingly has no desire for the mother figure, then the Freudian might say, ‘Well, it's repressed. It'll be there.’ Or if you find a Marxist and point out certain historic failures of Marxism, then they might say, ‘Well, it's never been tried properly, yet.’ In other words, if it's impossible to prove something or someone wrong, then it's not science. It's dogmatic conjecture. So, if you have a friend who tells you that they believe the world is run by extraterrestrial lizard people, ask them what it would take to disprove them. If they say nothing, then take Popper's advice and walk away.
Jonny Thomson
Region: GB
Friday 05 December 2025 16:15:00 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
Explore Prague :
That's what the lizard people want you to think.
2025-12-05 23:55:32
488
nick :
so how can one prove falsification theory as false?
2025-12-06 06:20:29
0
jojoisassbro :
Ahhh yes hegal and Marx……known for their study of fields that allow for experimentation and control of variables
2025-12-06 05:22:20
145
mlbsa_m :
Can the same be said for religion? Many have this idea that their religious beliefs cannot be falsified.
2025-12-07 05:34:03
76
MG :
See also climate change.
2025-12-06 05:02:35
3
QüestioNar :
Marxism, in the ways (and times) it has been tried, doesn't work. That doesn't mean that we have to stop trying to make it work.
2026-01-12 16:10:09
3
nzbdjfjrbfbdbfbdbfjr :
Considering how Marx himself preferred not to "write recipes for the kitchens of tomorrow", it's no wonder the implementations of his disciples haven't all turned out too great. Doesn't mean he wasn't correct on his analysis of our society.
2025-12-23 22:15:59
23
sparkling_spank :
well, now i would just have to walk away from... economics, language, history, pedagogic theory and probably law too? climate change!?
2025-12-06 02:25:29
3
Trondster :
I mean - you *can* test to see whether “true marxism” has been in place anywhere: look at the theory as proposed and compare it to the empirical evidence. In Trotsky’s case, he meant that absolutely nowhere has it been tried to give full ownership of the means of production to the workers (The soviet union claimed to do so, but empirically, the state just became the capitalist owning and profiting 🤷🏽♂️) so that claim is pretty falsifiable. Other than that, yeah.
2025-12-09 09:08:37
15
highlysuccessfulgntleman :
where's the proof his " tool" works?
2025-12-06 03:49:47
17
Bain Racing :
and yet medical "science" uses thr appeal to authority of peer reviewed studies. over biochemistry reality!
the irony! 😂👍
2026-01-02 09:45:22
0
Tommy :
‘There is no evidence that will convince me that squares have exactly 3 sides’… and yet it is not ‘nonsense’ to believe that to be the case.
2025-12-07 22:43:52
1
The Alchemist :
Farage voters won't understand
2025-12-06 00:45:40
27
onejune61 :
What if it is not nonsense, but the person not equipped to provide way to disprove it?
2025-12-05 17:16:47
11
Taragaarn Tara 🇦🇺 :
I like doing this in reverse, I explain this concept to someone, then tell them the thing they need to do to prove me wrong, then watch them stumble and stutter and fail to produce anything
2025-12-08 08:08:10
0
user9071147750794 :
actually this tool has been proven wrong by the Godel's theorem ("there will always be true statements about numbers that can never be proven or disproven").
2025-12-24 14:56:38
1
snowy_cookie 🇵🇭 :
Theres an interesting dilemma however some experiments are unethical to run. Theres a great example, are repeated exposure to general anaesthetics harmful to young child’s brain development- the answer is we dont know for sure
2025-12-05 19:26:42
8
Slaithstone :
You could have chosen a better example than gravity…
2026-01-14 16:59:31
1
Zoltan🇨🇦Kulle :
Gravity is something that we can experience, Marxism is an idea.
2026-01-21 00:14:31
0
artoomi000 :
The theory of evolution seemingly impossible to disprove but does that mean it is not science?
2025-12-06 11:27:19
1
The Nibbler :
Like man made "global warming" designed to raise taxes whilst people cannot afford to heat their homes?
2025-12-06 06:37:28
1
naapuri78 :
not being able to prove something wrong doesn't necessarily make it a dogmatic conjecture. for example in mathematics there exists true (and false) statements that cannot be proven to be true (or false).
2025-12-18 19:33:23
1
Ciprian pentru unPi :
Sorry, how do you disprove gravity?
2025-12-05 21:55:12
0
Stef :
Sadly, as evidenced in these comments, people never hold themselves to account as highly as everyone else when it comes to conjecture.
2025-12-06 10:52:08
3
The Power of Negative Thinking :
Popper never established that all of reality is scientifically testable. We shouldn't expect that to be true either now or even in the distant future.
2025-12-07 23:26:50
2
To see more videos from user @philosophyminis, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.