What about dependencies? Wouldn’t that mean losing ability would cause a dependency meaning it would lose its ability before it affects the lands?
2025-12-12 23:28:01
15
NotALizzard :
kitty still has to explain dependencies
2025-12-13 10:35:05
4
hahyoulookedyoulose :
rEaDiNg tHe cArD eXpLAiNs dA cARd
2025-12-13 05:04:02
1050
wyatt :
They done got PEMDAS in MTG😭😭
2025-12-14 02:27:48
557
Jason :
you need a law degree to play this game
2025-12-13 01:31:00
557
Ellie ✨ :
The fact that layers are treated like a 1 time effect that can’t be touched after because “it already happened” even tho it’s supposed to be ongoing feels kinda disingenuous. Like at that point just make it a one time effect
2025-12-13 17:10:14
68
Marshal Childress :
I am getting mixed answers online. if frogify removes an ability how can the ability exist. its gone. does frogify not work?
2025-12-13 08:13:25
21
ben_on_here :
I'm confused. wouldn't this mean all ability removal doesn't work??
2025-12-13 00:52:33
58
thealabamaslammer :
i learned how to play 3 different card games this year and competed at tournaments, yet ive been playing MTG for 13 years and im extremely confident i would get physically removed by a judge if i tried to play in a cEDH tourney
2025-12-13 11:39:09
232
EvoLiege :
Thank god none of my friends nor I care about layers lmaooo. Your moon losses it's abilities, it's now useless
2025-12-18 21:40:23
114
silentnight607 :
I understand the response is just that's how magic works, but it makes no sense to me that an ability would trigger after it has been removed. Like if the ability is gone then what exactly is making it happen?
2025-12-13 18:14:56
30
MysticArcanum13 :
I'm not gonna pretend like layers as a concept is wholly flawed, but it does feel a lil bs that you can play a card to negate an effect and just be told no because adding/removing abilities triggers after the ability itself, like wth is the point of being able to target that effect with a negate in the first place then?
2025-12-23 19:24:02
29
🇨🇦 italgod 🇨🇦 :
I’m going to need more of these especially for layers
2025-12-13 02:11:05
22
Michael Grimsley :
But what about Dependencies?
2025-12-13 06:27:25
66
clamoverd0se :
I learned nothing.
2025-12-14 05:06:49
18
noa :
Real question is why would kitty run fish lady if they are running fancy lands
2025-12-13 01:28:17
237
bobbykuhn996 :
This actually seems like a good argument for updating the rules. It's incredibly unintuitive to have something still be something "according to the rules" but completely defies what's said on the card.
2026-01-07 16:31:25
7
starlightlotusmtg :
At the beginning I was confused, and then, I was still confused 😅
2025-12-13 04:53:18
18
Cozmic :
I was wrong
2025-12-12 21:49:32
13
Axel Spetz :
So a card with effect in layer 1 will be untouchable by a card that has an effect in later layers ??
2026-06-28 20:55:54
0
mililililili_3 :
That doesn’t make any sense because the creature no longer has any abilities and its previous ability was a static ability. When its static ability is gone then it’s gone. You’re saying the ability exists after death? What is this post mortem nen from hxh? I don’t understand this at all
2025-12-17 08:56:57
4
Nate Miller :
what about mana produced? opponent plays enchantment that allows lands to produce any color mana. I them play Exotic Orchard and want to tap it for white mana.
2026-01-03 19:03:50
0
《MANA》 :
I...don't think this is how this works.
Reguardless of "layers" the creature doesn't have any abilities once the enchantment is placed on him. It's a completely different creature, so nothing is effecting the land.
2026-01-30 17:21:45
2
Flat Tire :
I AM KITTY 😭
2025-12-15 20:50:39
2
CommandryMTG :
I don’t know if this helped or hurt my brain 😅
2026-02-10 17:56:25
1
To see more videos from user @cardconduit, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.