Kerri Lavine
Region: US
Friday 12 December 2025 22:11:09 GMT
349105
14820
231
595
Music
Download
Comments
💙 Izzy H 💙 :
Holding some value yes, but $10,000 60 years ago is the equivalent of $100,000-$110,000 today. So it’s still a depreciating asset.
2025-12-12 23:08:39
834
EddieGlanceRealtor :
Yikes, she lost money when you account for inflation.
2025-12-13 00:28:58
379
NCmike81 :
I mean, ever since lab diamonds became available natural diamonds just are not the thing anymore. Lab diamonds are the EXACT same as composite and natural diamonds. The ONLY difference is 1 came from the ground and 1 was made in a lab. But the lab is 10 times cheaper but EXACTLY the same!! Why anyone would buy natural is beyond me.
2025-12-13 06:00:58
65
Ron :
Diamond is just a stone that has a made up value bc of good marketing. You can thank de beer company for that. The largest diamond co in the world.
2026-01-07 07:36:05
3
Michelle 🍎🇺🇸❤️ :
Worth $30,000-$40,000 and you’ll sell it for $60,000 🤣
2025-12-13 05:55:31
96
Tazori Collection :
If she had bought gold for $10000 60 years ago it would have been 1.2-1.3 million today . So I don’t think it was a great investment.
2026-01-01 03:50:34
62
caittdaltt :
The moment a diamond leaves retail, it loses 30–70% of its price. This includes natural diamonds.
2025-12-30 15:47:24
12
Isabelle 💋 :
$10000 sixty years ago was a fortune. That’s like saying we bought a $100,000 dollar ring in today’s money. So if it’s worth $40000 actually isn’t such a great deal anymore.
2026-01-28 04:12:35
7
alexandra <3 :
if she paid 10k in 1965, that’s now 97k cad. she lost a whole lot of money
2025-12-18 05:22:26
23
JLO :
So you mean the dealer who deals primarily in natural diamonds is telling people not to buy lab grown? Noooo, that can’t be
2025-12-31 22:44:09
30
biscuitsnphish :
$10,000 from 60 years ago (around 1966) would have the equivalent buying power of roughly $100,000 to over $110,000 today. you got screwed
2026-01-14 19:24:27
12
francine :
Sounds like she overpaid
2025-12-12 23:45:04
17
luvitliveitshareit :
Did she get it from Jack?? 🤔
2025-12-12 22:39:38
73
MLarry :
not an investment. 10 k put in stock 60 years ago would be 1/2 mil to be conservative
2026-01-04 01:03:18
33
Leanne :
grandma keep the ring
2025-12-14 16:04:50
70
Taylor Quinn :
I’m currently trying to sell my engagement ring that cost 10k, but I can’t get more than 1k unfortunately
2026-01-01 23:04:10
14
Do it Davine :
A natural diamond everytime!
2025-12-12 23:16:14
45
lha0986 :
You wouldn’t GIVE HER 30k for it ! You’d give her $5k maybe if she cashed out. If you went to buy it …. Yes $40k 🤷🏼♀️
2025-12-17 02:25:13
10
Tremaine :
Where’s part 2?
2025-12-16 22:29:58
7
NanoG :
Woulda rather put that 10,000into gold back then,
2026-01-06 22:26:26
6
Snow❌ :
That is stunning
2025-12-12 23:56:01
7
David the Iced Coffee Addict :
Why is fluorescence a bad thing?
2025-12-28 20:33:16
8
nah.man055 :
$103,000 in today's value
2025-12-13 06:40:39
10
Tarcísio H :
I disagree with you about the Fluorescent on diamonds ! Most of all famous diamonds on earth has a absolutely beautiful and unique Fluorescent. One example is The Hope Diamond’s red glow has long been considered a unique property of that stone. Most blue diamonds produce a bluish-white phosphorescence if exposed to ultraviolet light. The few other diamonds known to emit red phosphorescence were commonly assumed to have been from the even larger original stone from which the Hope was cut.
2025-12-17 21:52:38
5
Meghann Croitoru :
Holy mother of God that is stunning 😭😭😭
2025-12-12 22:36:24
5
To see more videos from user @godmotherofdiamonds, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
