i don t understand where is the catch here cuz both are wrong obviously
2025-12-17 13:22:47
1688
jojo_hughes :
both are wrong because of intent to cause harm.
2025-12-17 11:25:57
2362
Laura Mars 1983 :
How is this a difficult philosophical conundrum? They’re both obviously done something wrong.
2025-12-17 20:56:49
746
lovebardot :
Why are we assuming that non-existence is inherently bad
2025-12-17 14:52:02
290
khadija 🌻 :
what a waste of 2mins
2025-12-17 17:11:36
425
Top5 :
They are identical in their evil. The second woman’s ‘pill’ was knowledge.
2025-12-18 07:57:30
164
Mossy🐾 :
Obviously they both did something wrong, how is this hard? 🤣🤣🤣🥀😭
2025-12-17 12:50:10
38
Ema Masatu :
I suspect this video is shorter than its supposed to be
2025-12-17 14:28:26
356
OMAPOTS :
They both had the same intention and caused the same outcome. so yes, they both equally did something selfish and horrible. what's the problem here?
2025-12-17 16:04:01
101
Merryploppins🍉 :
They are both wrong. In what world would any of them not be?
2025-12-17 16:12:58
102
Flex :
Both are so horrible they are practically the same but the pill one is slightly worse
2025-12-17 22:20:51
6
MakeanvedenMakrilli :
The former is wrong. The latter may not be the most virtuous thing as opposed to waiting but it is no way wrong as the act of reproduction was still good as it resulted in a life better than no life
2025-12-17 16:11:22
10
Immortal Dugong :
Got a lot of respect for Alex but this argument is weak af
2025-12-17 18:03:46
55
??? :
Having a child IS an egotistical and self-centered decision, you don’t care about the child when you decide to have one, you just care about being a person who has a child.
2025-12-17 17:29:39
80
Chris Prendergast :
This was a waste of time. They’re the same
2025-12-18 01:18:45
6
Garry Knight :
Both scenarios are equally wrong 🤷
2025-12-17 22:04:10
20
Sam J :
I cannot begin to explain how both scenarios are silly and obviously both mothers are wrong. There is no dilemma here. Clear cut black and white. It just sounds intelligent but it is dumb. Want a real dilemma, read the "Trolley Problem" 🙄
2025-12-19 15:30:00
7
Joanne Hussain :
Yes both wrong
2025-12-17 13:24:17
133
Qawdhan :
bruh said philosophical problem
2025-12-17 11:20:36
16
minemanner :
There’s genuinely no comments understanding the dilemma 😭😭
2025-12-18 00:16:38
33
-_- :
Yeah? Even if the condition was never able to be cured that woman would still be wrong
2025-12-17 11:59:43
8
whywouldI :
for those confused, the second child's choice is not whether to be born with disability but whether to be born at all. Their specific existence is tied to that disability, for the mother to have a child without it, a different child would be born. We are asking this question from the perspective of the disabled adult child already existing, which is an important detail. The question becomes not should she have caused his disability, but rather should she have caused his existence. that's why the two scenarios are different. from the perspective of before the child is born the question feels obvious, the existence of a hypothetical child born with or without known disability is clear. But after, how do we label an existence that is inextricably linked to disability innately harmful without undermining the legitimacy of that person's existence?
2025-12-17 19:25:57
118
YouHateMyUsername :
I've never heard anything from Alex O'Connor that is actually deep or smart.
2025-12-17 14:17:38
81
Molls :
What are you talking about obviously that’s completely insane is there some sort of follow up to this video because I’m baffled
2025-12-17 17:53:49
20
To see more videos from user @ppe_clips, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.