@albert7777777: Replying to @Abutahsin if the Quran is true, why does Surah 54:34 contradict history and archaeology?

James Banks Nanfwang :

Their next argument against you will be "you're reading in English" after which they will turn to"why are you using colour pen on the Quran" 😂

Omar Ali :

baby saitama :

This is a category error, not a contradiction. Archaeology can only describe physical effects (burning, destruction, impact); it cannot determine divine method or sequence. The Qur’an mentioning a “storm of stones” (ḥijārah) does not exclude fire, heat, or combustion stones falling at extreme speed naturally cause burning, shockwaves, and fire-like آثار (effects). The Bible itself mentions both “brimstone” and destruction, showing multiple descriptive angles. The Qur’an is not a geology textbook; it states the cause by divine judgment, while archaeology observes the result on the ground. Different descriptions of the same event at different levels (theological vs physical) are not contradictions they are complementary

RaKim848 :

Easy to remember when you are reading or reciting in it's originalnform i.e. Arabic

laughalot :

merry Christmas

Ibn Ramadhan :

Who was the father to the husband of Mary according the bible

Umama Ali :

So, I stopped at the brimstone part and needed to check that(for the fact English wasn't my first language and didn't understand what that is until I searched it. U can also look it up two because I think u didn't know that there are brimstone rocks already, so, brimstone is a stone, and when the Quran says that they were destroyed with stones it's actually correct because brimstone is one. That part is done, I will continue watching and might come back if anything needs to be addressed (U will ask why not respond to my video with a video since u keep commenting more than once already! Well, because I don't usually post videos, that's why)

azziebuzz :

Proponents argue that the Quran contains precise historical details that were unknown in 7th-century Arabia and have only been confirmed by modern archaeology. Pharaoh vs. King: The Quranic narrative of Joseph refers to the ruler of Egypt as a "King" (Malik), while the narrative of Moses uses the term "Pharaoh." This distinction is argued to match historical records, as the term "Pharaoh" was not used for rulers until later in Egyptian history. Preservation of the Pharaoh: The Quran (Surah 10:92) claims that the body of the Pharaoh who pursued Moses would be saved as a sign. Some interpretations point to the existence of preserved, mummified remains of Egyptian rulers as validation. The Name Haman: The Quran mentions "Haman" as a high-ranking official close to Pharaoh involved in building projects. Some proponents argue that this correlates with interpretations of hieroglyphic inscriptions mentioning an official involved in quarrying and construction, arguing that this specific knowledge was not accessible to Muhammad. Ancient Cities: References to ancient cities like Babel (Babylon) and Iram (Ubar) are noted as places whose historical context aligns with Quranic descriptions.

sue.+09 :

volcanic eruptions are complex geodynamic events in which solid tephra products (ash, lapilli, bombs, and blocks) are released into the atmosphere together with a wide range of reactive and toxic gases, primarily water vapor, carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide.

ꓭǝɹʞɐʎ :

I couldn't understand what contradictions there were about the stone storm. A stone storm can be associated with stones erupting from a volcano or a meteor.

Lawyer73 :

How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to bring into the ark? - Genesis 6:19-20: God told Noah to take "from every animal a pair".- Genesis 7:2: says "from clean animals seven pairs". Here it is clear that there are two different traditions about the Flood - the "Yahwist" and the Priestly". One knows the concept of "clean" animals, the other does not. They were not aligned when the texts were combined. So - the contradiction is real, and the explanation lies in the layered compilation of the Book of Genesis.

abdelfatahbashir2 :

the only thing I can advise you is look for a teacher or a scholar if you wanted guidance, if you want to eat food you go to a restaurant for a chef to Cook for you, not to the bar for a bat attended to Cook for you

DAYIB :

because both of them has interfered by the people

umarbalasanda :

is the contradiction about stones and brimstones?

salam :

please ask people who have knowledge about Quran

Kabar Gembira :

Brooo your funny 🤣

Abba Gee :

Archaeology records ruins, not divine punishment, so Qur’an 54:34 describing how they were destroyed is not something archaeology can disprove.

Dr.Muhammad :

There is no evidence where people of lot use to live.

pinguindenuit :

Stones, fire, and brimstone can describe the same judgment. Genesis 19 says fire and brimstone; Joshua 10:11 shows God also punished with stones from heaven. Different wording ≠ different event.

j :

why

yuuuuuuu :

history??what date on date bro??🤔🤔🤔

UNCLE MIKE 68 :

Thank you so much for your studies

Dr.Muhammad :

Quran doesn’t negate the biblical version those suffer stones finds near Dead Sea are ultimately stones. And asteroid that bursts there was a stone too.

Pak Ujay | Pembuat Kaos Anak :

My man, you said "Don't need scholar" is like saying you don't need teacher, like saying just read book of math you become mathematician, read a book of medic then you become doctor. We need a good teacher man. That's why Allah gave us best teacher, a prophet.

nanakwame3858 :

Have you ever waste your time in finding contradictions in the Bible as you are doing for the Quran??