@.itsbberryfncs: โ‹† เฃช. ๊’ฐ ๐™›๐™–๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™–๐™ข ๐™™๐™š ๐™˜๐™๐™–๐™š๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™œ ๊’ฑ ๐Ÿชท เป‘ - ๐™›๐™–๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™–๐™ข ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™™๐™ž๐™™๐™ค ๐™ฅ๐™ค๐™ง @๐‘™— ๐ฐฦž๊žŽโƒจ๐‘„† โ™ก แฉ™๐–ผ๐•™โบ๊ฏญแง‰๐•ช๐‘„ˆ๐Ÿ–๏ธ แฉ™ โŒ‡ โ‹ฎ โธโธโ‡ฃ ๊’ฐ ๐—‚๐–ป : ๐“‚โ„ฏ แŽ’ ? แจณ .หšแŸนึดื„โฌซื„ึด taggies : : โคฟ ึดื„#chaeyoung #fancams #xnista #fps #twicechaeyoung

โŒ— ๊’ฐ ๐–ฟ ๐–บ ๐—‡ ๐–ผ ๐–บ ๐—† ๐—Œ ๊’ฑ โ™ฅ๏ธŽ
โŒ— ๊’ฐ ๐–ฟ ๐–บ ๐—‡ ๐–ผ ๐–บ ๐—† ๐—Œ ๊’ฑ โ™ฅ๏ธŽ
Open In TikTok:
Region: ES
Thursday 25 December 2025 12:47:37 GMT
280584
22584
101
13865

Music

Download

Comments

chayonmygirl
chayon :
A esta cosita le hicieron 110 vรญdeos? ๐Ÿ’”
2025-12-29 07:15:44
175
mia_ztyy
๊งเผบ ๐“œ๐“ฒฬ๐“ช เผป๊ง‚ :
Vean mis favoritos๐Ÿ’—
2026-08-01 22:49:48
1
plumnah
nah. ์ฑ„์˜ โฅ :
2026-01-18 18:39:09
11
mi1llxman0nn_
^แชฒแชฒแชฒ mili โค๏ธŽ mอŸaอŸnon แตŽแตŽ โŠน เฃช :
LINDQQQ, esos videitos los sacas d la cuenta d twice?, osea son vlogs d Chae??๐Ÿ’˜
2025-12-27 03:22:56
6
angelicalprinccess
๐Ÿชท :
AYY MUCHAS GRACIAS ESTA HERMOSOO ๐Ÿ’“๐Ÿ’“
2025-12-25 17:48:35
7
secrett_us26
๐Ÿ’ค :
Holaa, pueden apoyar mi cuentita? es de chaesita y eso, apenas voy aprendiendo a hacer videos Asi ๐Ÿ’•
2026-02-13 03:39:15
4
.lovengchae
๐“shley :
Puedo utilizarlo? Te doy CD๐Ÿฅฐ๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒท
2025-12-28 06:31:29
5
_itz.melzz
@ ๐•ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ. ๐Ÿ’ฃ :
Puedo utilizarlo?
2026-01-12 23:09:54
1
chaeyoungfresi2
^o^ :
Es necesario dar creditossss?
2026-01-26 22:31:49
3
minari_163822
สšห™minariห™ษžโ™ก :
like por esa hermosuraaaa๐Ÿ˜
2025-12-26 18:55:34
3
cha3y_lovf
maria โฃ๏ธ :
Haces pedidos? puedes hacer uno de clips como el de el video de niki de enhypen?? ๐Ÿ’˜
2026-01-01 16:34:47
1
kat22160
๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด๏ฟด ๏ฟด๏ฟด๏ฟด๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด ๏ฟด :
Amo a chaeyoung
2026-01-03 06:44:44
7
chaeytigersz
ห™แฐ‹ ๐“ˆ’ แฉ˜ เฃชแ‘ฏแณž๐™–๊ฌปื‚ื…แƒง๊ฏญ ๐Ÿฏ !ยก ื. :
2026-03-09 02:36:33
1
.adorelau
love. :
Te acabo de conocer y creo que nunca soltarรฉ tus fancams, ESTAN PRESIOSOSS! ๐Ÿ’•
2025-12-28 02:25:17
0
melissagastelum68
Jerry :
voy a usar este fancam pq quiero hacer los videos de poi poi poi๐Ÿ˜ญ
2026-07-08 21:12:42
1
nina_89021
NO DISPONIBLE ๐Ÿ˜• :
lo voy a utilizar ๐Ÿ’ž
2025-12-31 20:32:11
1
chaey363
สš ๐’„๐’‰๐’‚๐’†๐’š๐’๐’–๐’๐’ˆ แฐ”แฉš ๐’™๐’Š๐’‚ :
Es que chae es hermoss
2025-12-30 04:05:52
1
ki.a670
ูญ :
oiii vou botar ib okeyy??
2026-07-06 19:54:24
0
flowrsbjen
@ โ€˜ ๐“™ulie ! :
mds o amor da minha vida ๐Ÿ˜“โค๏ธ
2026-06-30 20:29:22
0
eluu2016
โ— ๐“”๐˜ญ๐˜ถ โœฆ ๐“”๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐Ÿค :
Cuando era xnista de chaeyoung me hubiese gustado encontrar a estos famcams
2026-07-24 16:10:42
1
giselle.aespa29
เฃช ๊ฃ‘เงŽ ื… ๐“œiแƒ๐•š โค๏ธŽ แฅดาปรค๐•– ๐Ÿฅ :
ideas: la chica que robo mi corazรณn en twice
2026-08-10 20:25:39
0
gliter_illit
โ‹†หš๐œ—mocha๐œšหšโ‹† :
pgg
2025-12-28 07:52:09
0
To see more videos from user @.itsbberryfncs, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

T-80U๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ | Edit | In 1993โ€“1994, Sweden conducted extensive evaluations of foreign armor to select a new main battle tank for its armed forces (under the procurement program that ultimately led to the Strv 121 / 122). While the primary competition was between Western tanksโ€”the Leopard 2A5, M1A2 Abrams, and Leclercโ€”Russia offered two T-80U tanks for evaluation. โ€‹Sweden received two T-80U vehicles along with a Russian technical crew for maintenance. From October 1993 to March 1994, the tanks underwent rigorous testing at the Boden and Skรถvde proving grounds, with a strong focus on harsh winter operating conditions. โ€‹Key Strengths Noted by the Swedish Military โ€‹Mobility and Snow Performance: The GTD-1250 gas turbine engine performed exceptionally well. The T-80U started reliably in extreme cold and demonstrated superior speed and dynamic handling across deep snow and soft soil due to its high power-to-weight ratio. โ€‹Low Profile and Weight: At approximately 46 metric tons, the T-80U was significantly lighter and smaller than its Western counterparts, making it a harder target to hit and easier to transport across Swedish bridges. โ€‹Armor Protection: The Kontakt-5 explosive reactive armor (ERA) suite impressed Swedish evaluators with its high effectiveness against both kinetic and shaped-charge threats for the era. โ€‹Firepower: The mechanical autoloader ensured a consistent rate of fire, and the capability to launch Reflex (AT-11 Sniper) gun-launched anti-tank guided missiles via the 125mm 2A46M-1 smoothbore gun provided long-range engagements. โ€‹Main Drawbacks and Reasons for Rejection โ€‹Fire Control System and Sights: The lack of thermal imaging sights for both the gunner and commander (the evaluation tanks were equipped with the Buran-PA night vision sight) placed the T-80U at a severe disadvantage against Western tanks equipped with modern thermal optics. โ€‹Crew Ergonomics and Survivability: Testers noted cramped crew conditions and highlighted the vulnerability of the carousel autoloader stored inside the crew compartment in the event of armor penetration. โ€‹Fuel Consumption and Logistics: The gas turbine engine consumed excessive fuel, especially at idle. Furthermore, political instability in Russia during the early 1990s raised serious concerns regarding long-term spare parts supply and support. โ€‹Commander Situation Awareness: The absence of a fully independent commander's panoramic sight limited overall battlefield awareness compared to the Leopard 2A5 and Abrams. โ€‹Outcome โ€‹The T-80U evaluation served largely as a technical benchmark and an opportunity for Swedish forces to assess Russian armored capabilities. Sweden ultimately chose a customized version of the German Leopard 2A5, designated Strv 122. Following the conclusion of trials in March 1994, both T-80U tanks were returned to Russia #tank #tankedit #military #militaryedit #tanks #larp #editmilitary #t80
T-80U๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ | Edit | In 1993โ€“1994, Sweden conducted extensive evaluations of foreign armor to select a new main battle tank for its armed forces (under the procurement program that ultimately led to the Strv 121 / 122). While the primary competition was between Western tanksโ€”the Leopard 2A5, M1A2 Abrams, and Leclercโ€”Russia offered two T-80U tanks for evaluation. โ€‹Sweden received two T-80U vehicles along with a Russian technical crew for maintenance. From October 1993 to March 1994, the tanks underwent rigorous testing at the Boden and Skรถvde proving grounds, with a strong focus on harsh winter operating conditions. โ€‹Key Strengths Noted by the Swedish Military โ€‹Mobility and Snow Performance: The GTD-1250 gas turbine engine performed exceptionally well. The T-80U started reliably in extreme cold and demonstrated superior speed and dynamic handling across deep snow and soft soil due to its high power-to-weight ratio. โ€‹Low Profile and Weight: At approximately 46 metric tons, the T-80U was significantly lighter and smaller than its Western counterparts, making it a harder target to hit and easier to transport across Swedish bridges. โ€‹Armor Protection: The Kontakt-5 explosive reactive armor (ERA) suite impressed Swedish evaluators with its high effectiveness against both kinetic and shaped-charge threats for the era. โ€‹Firepower: The mechanical autoloader ensured a consistent rate of fire, and the capability to launch Reflex (AT-11 Sniper) gun-launched anti-tank guided missiles via the 125mm 2A46M-1 smoothbore gun provided long-range engagements. โ€‹Main Drawbacks and Reasons for Rejection โ€‹Fire Control System and Sights: The lack of thermal imaging sights for both the gunner and commander (the evaluation tanks were equipped with the Buran-PA night vision sight) placed the T-80U at a severe disadvantage against Western tanks equipped with modern thermal optics. โ€‹Crew Ergonomics and Survivability: Testers noted cramped crew conditions and highlighted the vulnerability of the carousel autoloader stored inside the crew compartment in the event of armor penetration. โ€‹Fuel Consumption and Logistics: The gas turbine engine consumed excessive fuel, especially at idle. Furthermore, political instability in Russia during the early 1990s raised serious concerns regarding long-term spare parts supply and support. โ€‹Commander Situation Awareness: The absence of a fully independent commander's panoramic sight limited overall battlefield awareness compared to the Leopard 2A5 and Abrams. โ€‹Outcome โ€‹The T-80U evaluation served largely as a technical benchmark and an opportunity for Swedish forces to assess Russian armored capabilities. Sweden ultimately chose a customized version of the German Leopard 2A5, designated Strv 122. Following the conclusion of trials in March 1994, both T-80U tanks were returned to Russia #tank #tankedit #military #militaryedit #tanks #larp #editmilitary #t80

About