Waterloo is incredibly important. Without it we wouldn't have had ABBA, and that's a world that's just not worth living in.
2025-12-30 18:39:12
23
mattfriend795 :
France had too much war fatigue by 1815 that even if Napoleon won Waterloo, the chance of him restoring the Empire would have been incredibly slim.
2025-12-29 18:38:59
18
Aidan Halpin :
Enniskillen Fusiliers and any other Irish soldiers would have been mostly Irish/Gaelic speakers
2026-01-15 11:31:50
1
Jeeves Dog Rescue :
Do you believe in any of the theories that Napoleon did in fact escape from his final imprisonment?
2026-01-04 22:36:34
0
davidpattison182 :
Why was Napoleon so unpopular that created such a large alliance against him.
2025-12-31 15:23:11
1
David Pollock2 :
Of course it did . If Napoleon had won who knows what would've happened
2026-01-05 23:22:09
0
caveman :
Was Napoleon really that good as general as history tells us or was France just a mighty country🤔.
2026-01-01 11:13:14
1
Dr Zack White :
Genuine question: how many of you know about/care about the Battle of Waterloo?
2025-12-28 15:39:33
4
Laura Corbiere :
Have you been to one of the reenactments that they do at the Waterloo battle site? I went to the 200th anniversary one and it was amazing.
2025-12-28 20:05:04
3
.. :
should of made sure he got Richard Sharpe , that was his mistake
2025-12-29 20:54:02
3
nedluddite0 :
I've just read a book about Peterloo. 😁
2025-12-28 16:40:07
2
user8715974668187 :
Sure. But the British won this war on the seas. St Vincent, Nile, Copenhagen, Trafalgar. Waterloo was the nail in the coffin.
2025-12-30 16:55:02
2
Steven Waton :
Wellington wasn’t the head of the delegation for any more than 1 month. From September- Feb uk lead representative was Castlereagh. Wellington was head after he left in Feb but only for a few weeks till he himself left in march to prepare to fight napoleon. Castlereagh negotiated the deal and not any material changes occurred from wellingtons time there
2025-12-29 19:37:56
1
Meeware :
I am here for this… so my follow up question would be: which mattered more, Trafalgar or Waterloo?
2025-12-29 19:01:39
1
4405 :
During the 100 days Napoleon's purpose was to bring the great powers to the negotiating table. The great powers were moving towards France's borders, Napoleon took the great gamble, the manouvre of the central position, invading Belgium, dividing the Allied army from an advancing Prussian army at Ligny & Quatre Bras. The Prussians were soundly defeated & withdrew towards Wavre. On the 17th June 1815 In the early morning Wellington believed he had lost, many modern historians believe Quatre Bras was a draw as neither Ney or Wellington achieved their overall objectives. At arround 09.00 a Prussian messenger informed Wellington that if he could hold roughly half of the French army on the Brussels road, he, Blucher, would march from Wavre through the Boise de Paris to the sound of the guns. Wellington's strategy was to hold Mon St Jean until the Prussians arrived with 3 of their 4 Korps. The remaining Prussian Korps remained at Wavre engaging Grouchy's Right Flank of the Armee du Nord.
2025-12-29 18:37:40
1
Charles Palmer :
Have you factored this into your calculations? Population of French Empire in 1814: 44 million. Russian Empire: 31 million. Austrian Empire: 27 million. Prussia: 5 million. Britain: 12 million. Spain: 10 million.
2025-12-29 18:16:37
1
Michiel8211 :
Now the battle at Quatre Bras, that one mattered.
2026-01-02 22:23:28
1
Otzi38 :
Si Napoléon eu triomphé , le monde eu était différent. Vive l empereur
2025-12-31 21:23:40
1
Mike :
Absolutely did, if Napoleon had won Europe would probably be a different place today.
2025-12-31 23:27:33
1
Howth Adventures :
Tell the story of the Iron Duke and the duels he fought
2026-01-01 10:17:28
1
Wolfe1798 :
It changed a lot. It led to the Congress of Vienna under Wellington which began nearly 100 years of British engineered alliances that gave England peace.
2026-01-16 09:20:19
0
user75444521711716 :
it stopped him dominating continental Europe
2026-01-05 14:37:19
0
user677872128728 :
Absolutely. Have been to the battlefield.
2026-01-02 10:28:34
0
HalfGoodHalfBadBoy :
No. Napoleon hat barely enough troops to fight the British and Prussian separately. Even if he wins Waterloo the British and Prussians could simply withdraw and then the Russians and Austrians finish the job.
2025-12-31 23:23:30
0
christopherochard4 :
I am French , and since we lost a lot . Now evebody speaks English ( before French were spoken in every country) , lost navigation rule , trade rule ,but some countries became later more modern and a nation since Napoleon : Italie , Germany , Poland . Etc ..
2025-12-31 20:24:03
0
Toledo :
it is an understatement to say it had a huge financial repercussion. a pigeon changed the history.
2025-12-31 17:47:54
0
Marengo Magic 💗 :
Yes it does ! 😉
2025-12-31 16:37:37
0
stanrad :
Yes people life’s
2025-12-31 12:26:17
0
BlackBias84 :
The battle ended France. Literally. It also showed republics are weak and soulless thinly veiled dictatorships
2025-12-30 22:24:25
0
NumNoo :
Why don't you make the reasoning the right way mate. If Napoleon has existed its because the British-led intervention at Toulon (1793) was the indispensable catalyst for Napoleon Bonaparte's rise. It was his first major command, his first victory, and the event that propelled him from an obscure, disaffected Corsican artillery officer onto the national stage. Without that stage, his later opportunities in Italy and Egypt are unimaginable.
2025-12-29 19:50:39
0
To see more videos from user @zwhitehistory, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.