I get it, but there were like 5 passes after that. All defenders recovered - how far back is too far back? Was an advantage really gained?
2025-12-29 16:45:48
435
Ade Mason ❌ :
It was absolute nonsense, Bergvall had nothing to do with it, passes had gone beyond his involvement, had Spurs lost the game, they’d have questions to ask as it was a pathetic decision.
2025-12-29 17:36:58
34
Donoghue1988 :
Cheers for that.
2025-12-29 15:59:25
74
thfcjake :
Richarlison was offside anyway
2025-12-29 20:10:15
7
Me :
I’m a Tottenham fan if you’re on the pitch in a offside position you’re offside
2025-12-29 18:20:46
7
Bills Travels 🗺️ :
Omg breaking news, he was offside cos he was offside
2025-12-31 00:19:13
0
Pete :
Yet decisions where players who have been stood in front of the keeper and have been deemed as not interfering with play, have been given. No one can convince me that the game is not corrupt.
2025-12-29 17:06:56
22
🤟🏼 :
Why is this news?
2025-12-30 17:20:30
0
h_morgan7 :
Bergvall didn’t touch the ball. Did he??
2025-12-29 19:40:52
3
tm0071231 :
So they’ve come out and explained the offside was given because there was an offside? Got it
2025-12-29 16:47:23
21
Jesmo :
Yes, that’s what happened.
2025-12-29 23:43:16
0
Martin :
If your not interfering with play then it should be allowed
2025-12-30 11:21:13
0
Rigatoni :
The second one was worse. The ball is already off kudus’ foot from when they drew their lines.