@taylormakesvideos: my toxic trait is that i'd be first in line on opening day 😅

Taylor Black

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Monday 05 January 2026 23:00:00 GMT

3046649

289376

1383

10776

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.61MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (3.03MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Mel Targaryen :

For those curious, Gattaca was #1

2026-01-06 17:03:02

15452

⛤ :

Interstellar being top 5

2026-02-19 11:52:19

2066

Booksareforlife :

I bet #1 is Wall-E

2026-01-06 11:19:57

28533

Mandy :

Is this Trump’s NASA or like NASA NASA?

2026-01-06 17:31:39

23532

MEANGIRL :

I feel like NASA isn’t even scientifically accurate.

2026-01-07 09:53:32

12766

📚🧶 Jessa Minnie ❌️ :

Michael Crichton did not drop the ball when it came to the science in his books. he was a medical doctor (he wrote ER!) and was a fantastic researcher. everything i know about DNA came from Jurassic Park (the book).

2026-01-06 04:28:55

2740

HenriettaHillbilly :

“Idiocracy” has to be in the top two.

2026-01-06 13:44:33

3582

Chuck Swift :

NASA know as much about dinosaurs, as they do about space. 🤔😏🤣🤣

2026-01-06 11:03:36

684

Rick😎 :

Interstellar is probably #1. They had a theoretical physicist working on set during the film. Nolan wanted the movie to be as accurate as possible.

2026-01-06 20:08:27

2502

drelook85 :

I don't believe anything NASA say

2026-01-07 21:08:28

829

Odin :

Billionaire plays around and innocent people die, yeah that checks out as accurate

2026-01-07 01:49:17

1912

Breuer :

Because Michael Crichton was a huge nerd and wrote the book to be as accurate as possible

2026-01-06 01:20:36

306

Joe jerkoff :

NASA in Hebrew means to deceive

2026-02-15 15:40:38

8

Briandizzle :

we still believe NAsa? 💀

2026-01-07 15:16:18

246

Gjinn :

nasa those truth tellers 😂

2026-01-06 14:20:58

117

RB_music31 🤓♊️🏳️‍🌈 :

I need to know the top ten line up now 🤔

2026-01-05 23:55:45

682

´✿.｡.:* ᵍᵃᵇᵇʸ ´✿.｡.:* :

#1 is Twilight

2026-03-02 04:42:22

31

GuitarECGaming :

Understand - you can be very accurate, and still be completely implausible. (i.e. Yup, that's how it would be done - if it were possible to do...)

2026-01-05 23:42:31

125

Greg Southall :

Crichton knew his science. The movie came out when I was in in high school, we read the book in honors biology. DNA was a relatively new concept. The science used was very flawed, but not intentionally so. There were few egregious mistakes

2026-01-06 07:32:11

165

Azriel Nicole Kyle :

Interstellar has to be the 1st

2026-01-06 20:52:23

94

jack_callahan01 :

What the hell does a space agency have to do with biology?

2026-02-01 08:48:38

9

Cycloon16 :

What are the other six?

2026-01-05 23:54:04

58

✨️Arta The Artist✨️ :

because Michael Crichton was the man! his books are VERY technical and science-heavy and the movie stuck to the source-material pretty well 🦖

2026-01-06 14:05:11

44

Aiden :

What the hell does that even mean

2026-03-04 00:46:52

7

To see more videos from user @taylormakesvideos, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

omantal team vizat at my site QARNALAM

omantal team vizat at my site QARNALAM

#حزن

Temen kok gini 😩🙏 #filmpaketsantet #paketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #viral #tiktoktainment #4u #fatihunru #yasaminjasem #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #fypシ #taylorswift

Temen kok gini 😩🙏 #filmpaketsantet #paketsantet #dikiriminpaketsantet #viral #tiktoktainment #4u #fatihunru #yasaminjasem #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #fypシ #taylorswift

#fypシ #foryoupage #tiktokshop

#fypシ #foryoupage #tiktokshop

#قلبي معي #حرفياً #العراق🇮🇶 #الموصل_دهوك_اربيل_بغداد_كركوك #الخليج_العربي

#قلبي معي #حرفياً #العراق🇮🇶 #الموصل_دهوك_اربيل_بغداد_كركوك #الخليج_العربي

Why the Apostles' Bible Isn't the Protestant One The apostles never read the Protestant Bible. They could not have. The Old Testament that Jesus quoted, that Saint Paul preached from, that the entire early Church carried across the Roman Empire, contained books that Protestants removed fifteen hundred years after Christ. So whose Bible is actually the original one, and why does almost no one in the West tell this story honestly? When the apostles spread the Gospel, they did not travel with Hebrew scrolls. They used the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament that had been in use among Jews and Gentiles since roughly two hundred years before Christ. And the Septuagint contained all seven of the so-called extra books, including Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and First and Second Maccabees. This is not a Catholic opinion, it is plain historical fact recognized by scholars across every tradition. Roughly two-thirds of every Old Testament quotation in the New Testament comes directly from the Septuagint. Paul quotes from it constantly. The writer of Hebrews quotes from it. Jesus himself quotes from it. The Letter to the Hebrews even references the martyrdom story from Second Maccabees, a book Protestants discarded. And the Book of Wisdom describes the suffering Messiah a hundred years before Christ was born, prophesying the very Passion that Jesus would later endure. This is the part that should stop every honest reader in their tracks. If the apostles, the writers of the New Testament, and Jesus himself used an Old Testament that included these books, then the sixty-six book canon cannot possibly be the original Bible. It is a later edit. The Catholic Bible is the apostles' Bible, preserved unbroken from the first century to today. History settled this question long before the Reformation ever began. #Catholic #Bible #Septuagint #CatholicChurch #ApologeticsBooks credit video IG reels catholicsharehq

Why the Apostles' Bible Isn't the Protestant One The apostles never read the Protestant Bible. They could not have. The Old Testament that Jesus quoted, that Saint Paul preached from, that the entire early Church carried across the Roman Empire, contained books that Protestants removed fifteen hundred years after Christ. So whose Bible is actually the original one, and why does almost no one in the West tell this story honestly? When the apostles spread the Gospel, they did not travel with Hebrew scrolls. They used the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament that had been in use among Jews and Gentiles since roughly two hundred years before Christ. And the Septuagint contained all seven of the so-called extra books, including Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and First and Second Maccabees. This is not a Catholic opinion, it is plain historical fact recognized by scholars across every tradition. Roughly two-thirds of every Old Testament quotation in the New Testament comes directly from the Septuagint. Paul quotes from it constantly. The writer of Hebrews quotes from it. Jesus himself quotes from it. The Letter to the Hebrews even references the martyrdom story from Second Maccabees, a book Protestants discarded. And the Book of Wisdom describes the suffering Messiah a hundred years before Christ was born, prophesying the very Passion that Jesus would later endure. This is the part that should stop every honest reader in their tracks. If the apostles, the writers of the New Testament, and Jesus himself used an Old Testament that included these books, then the sixty-six book canon cannot possibly be the original Bible. It is a later edit. The Catholic Bible is the apostles' Bible, preserved unbroken from the first century to today. History settled this question long before the Reformation ever began. #Catholic #Bible #Septuagint #CatholicChurch #ApologeticsBooks credit video IG reels catholicsharehq

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy