@danchoiu8:

NĐH⚽️
NĐH⚽️
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Wednesday 07 January 2026 03:54:45 GMT
183365
6869
52
194

Music

Download

Comments

nguyentruongbao4a
Bảo mê diều sáo ☑️ :
tội fota quá 😭
2026-01-07 05:29:51
19
vhuy1440
wizard_213 :
2026-01-08 11:31:24
8
quynh.huong.huong0
Mãi yêu 6A :
yên nghỉ nhé Diogo Jota
2026-02-15 04:01:01
3
mnhuy_23092010
Mai Huy :
yên nghỉ nhé dio jota 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
2026-01-09 11:51:03
4
zakunonopro
fakePhúcEdit :
2026-01-09 02:30:27
4
ditmema16
ditmema16 :
CR7 tinh tế quá
2026-01-15 00:58:24
3
danchoiu8
NĐH⚽️ :
g
2026-01-07 13:20:40
0
legiang699
snowquar :
yên nghỉ nhé jota
2026-02-18 03:21:20
0
pglg21
🔥 :
ôi tinh tế vcl 😭 tư duy đỉnh
2026-03-30 17:18:36
0
thnh123429
REDZ冇 :
@jcndkfjbnmzaqw
2026-01-17 01:08:13
0
team.vng0
꧁☯︎SKD.FF☯︎꧂ :
Thời
2026-01-13 12:47:49
0
danchoiu8
NĐH⚽️ :
g
2026-01-07 13:20:37
2
danchoiu8
NĐH⚽️ :
h
2026-01-07 13:20:42
2
danchoiu8
NĐH⚽️ :
e
2026-01-07 13:20:35
0
quanronaldocr7
GoDZaRo :
acc
2026-01-07 10:01:55
0
phamtrongdaiii
Trọng Đại :
đến viếng sau cũng là 1 cách🥰
2026-01-14 05:25:44
0
user93813334511445l
Dorraemon☘️ :
bùôn cho anh fota quá😭
2026-01-07 09:09:03
3
tho.ly438
Đớ doly*nhầm :
😳😳😳
2026-01-08 09:54:38
2
ho.l4482
tin đẹp trai :
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
2026-01-08 06:40:41
2
dieunhuthuii
𝓐𝓷𝓱𝓝𝓱ư 💗💋 :
🍀🍀🍀
2026-01-08 10:05:16
2
duyn2k95
15th9 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-01-07 14:50:30
2
t.sng4763
Tub hmoob xyob 😉 :
🥰🥰🙏🙏
2026-01-07 13:34:06
2
halluudimong369
𓍯𓂃𝙰𝚊𝚛𝚘𝚗 𝙻𝚞𝚟𝚒𝚊⋆౨ৎ :
🥹
2026-01-18 01:28:14
0
h.nguyn.chuyn
lee yori 🐭 :
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
2026-02-28 10:11:50
0
huuvinh6_4_2003
vinh :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-02-13 14:23:56
0
To see more videos from user @danchoiu8, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

tuff sigma Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #fyp #actor ##одинцово #tccedit  #kulyamov
tuff sigma Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #fyp #actor ##одинцово #tccedit #kulyamov

About