I get the concern about power, hypocrisy, and later institutional abuse — Scripture itself critiques that. But when people say “Jesus taught something different and it was later changed,” we have to ask: changed from what sources?
The earliest records we have — the Gospels and Paul’s letters — already show repentance, obedience, community authority, and worship of Jesus well before Constantine (John 14:15; John 20:28; Philippians 2:9–11). Paul didn’t act independently; his message was affirmed by the Jerusalem apostles (Galatians 2:9), and his letters were already treated as Scripture in the early church (2 Peter 3:15–16).
Appealing to a “truer Jesus” while dismissing the earliest witnesses who preserved his teachings isn’t historical neutrality — it’s reinterpretation shaped by modern spirituality. Critiquing abuse is fair; separating Jesus from the apostolic witness that defines him isn’t.
2026-01-31 10:14:26
0
CallMeBoss :
❤️🙏🏼
2026-01-22 16:30:52
1
Brandon__088 :
Jesus is the way the truth and the Life
2026-01-19 18:38:07
2
MAL :
Yes, but I used to know someone who belonged to a religious organization called The Way and it was a cult. So, I believe this post is true. Be careful looking for the truth in others.
2026-01-19 15:32:54
1
To see more videos from user @steffie4444, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.