@taylortenly13: blueberry cheesecake iced protein coffee 🫐☕️ @Caffeine, Candles & Chaos is the absolute goat in the mornings with getting my protein, biotin, collagen and vitamins in because who likes taking a handful of supplements or dumping a bunch of chunky ass powders in your coffee?! 🤢 and not to mention saving money on the drive thru! click the orange shopping cart and stock up while they’re on sale. do it because your health depends on your quality of life. take back yourself. 🙌🏻 #fyp #viral #coffee #Fitness #trending

Taylor Tenly
Taylor Tenly
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 30 January 2026 16:02:18 GMT
436345
10106
190
421

Music

Download

Comments

ck74y
Gio the Cat :
People make your own protien coffee...it's called protein powder and Instant coffee
2026-10-04 03:40:39
0
whitneydabsss
whitneydabsss :
girl I seen another creator make a blueberry cheesecake coffee and I made it and its so good. she makes cream cheese cold foam to make it really like cheesecake and its 🔥
2026-03-19 00:07:28
60
heatherrein1221
Dawn :
My husband is a type 1 diabetic who has to use carbs to calculate insulin doses… do you understand how fucking dangerous it is to be selling this stuff with a COMPLETELY BOGUS NUTRITION LABEL and carb count, I really hope someone sues you
2026-07-26 02:12:17
3
capitalanospace
LeeAnne :
I got these a while back, but I’ve noticed the macros don’t add up even close considering the total calories listed on the nutrition fact…can someone explain this??
2026-06-03 02:37:04
7
herhilife2
Herhilife2 :
It’s not even listed as a flavor
2026-09-27 22:02:55
0
jazzymouse1
Jazzy🖤 :
I don't have a gallbladder and I swear this is the only coffee that doesn't mess with me
2026-02-02 15:51:51
111
breehz13
Breehz13🌈 :
You got me hooked on these a few months ago when you showed up on my fyp! I stopped by my old coffee stand recently and the girls there said they missed me. I told them I’ve been making them at home now! Haha Saving that money! 💰
2026-02-01 00:01:39
15
hannahprice2018
Hannah 😁 :
you have 11:11 on your neck ! that is my birthday 🎂
2026-09-10 15:56:53
0
azrenorva
AzrenorVA :
Were there bathroom runs?
2026-07-25 18:59:40
1
harmonyquinn_
HarmonyHatred™ :
If it doesn’t taste like protein, someone needs to check it in the lab for protein. The last TikTok company that didn’t taste like protein ended up having NONE, which is quite a feat.
2026-08-19 21:55:11
1
mlp2958
🦋🦋🦋🦋🦋🦋 :
Freaking love Caramel Macchiato… ever since I found it, I can’t be without it
2026-04-20 05:45:22
1
siphappenscoffee
Sip Happens | Coffee :
We’re gonna have to try this! Never thought blueberry and coffee would work well together but. I guess we’ll try it.
2026-03-07 00:23:58
5
lizrodriguez111991
Liz Rojas :
I ordered a bunch because of you and I wasn't disappointed
2026-03-05 00:47:07
17
erica.martgan
Erica Martgan :
may I take a sip🫪
2026-07-27 00:48:31
3
crystalk737
Crystal :
Girl before you even start talkin I heart your video
2026-02-02 00:29:56
9
crochet_away_with_jess
Crochet Away With Jess :
Ordered!!
2026-02-06 00:07:57
2
gg121618
GG🫶🏼 :
This but with blackberry sounds delicious
2026-02-15 04:27:23
10
hannahprice2018
Hannah 😁 :
also this look so dang good!!!!
2026-09-10 15:57:01
1
jcox1585
jennybear1585 :
they were gross
2026-02-01 17:13:33
12
kristigrove
Kristi Grove606 :
we make blueberry compote all the time for pancakes. delicious!!!
2026-01-31 14:20:08
9
asiawolfmother13
AsiaWolf🐺💜 :
Yummy
2026-08-31 04:49:14
1
dude.wheresmyvape
t0mbstonedd :
how do u make the coffee itself tho?
2026-06-25 12:12:26
4
nemmanemm
Nemmy :
I never tried blueberries in coffee before. this looks like it slap
2026-05-23 02:10:08
2
ramiethesimplewitch
FindingMe💐🧹🌛 :
you CAN taste the protein. its ok coffee but be honest
2026-05-10 05:01:16
3
cafeconnectionsapp
CafeConnections :
Wow this looks unreal
2026-03-23 20:40:13
3
To see more videos from user @taylortenly13, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Al-Ghazali and Ibn Taymiyyah on Aristotelian Logic #Alghazali did not simply destroy Aristotelian logic; he appropriated it while criticizing some of its epistemological claims. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali authored The Standard of Knowledge (Miʿyar al-ʿIlm) and The Touchstone of Proof (Miḥakk al-Naẓar), and even introduced logical discussions into al-Mustaṣfā. He regarded logic, in itself, as a useful instrument for distinguishing sound reasoning from defective reasoning and therefore as applicable to Islamic disciplines. Nevertheless, he challenged the logicians’ claim that Aristotelian demonstrative syllogism is the only route to certainty. He questioned the assumption that knowledge necessarily depends on ḥadd—a complete, essential definition—and argued that many forms of knowledge cannot be acquired through Aristotelian syllogism alone. His project was therefore one of appropriation and reformulation, making logic serve theology, jurisprudence, and dialectics rather than treating it as the exclusive method of philosophy. #Ibntaymiyya , however, went much further: he challenged the epistemological foundations of Aristotelian logic itself. In al-Radd ʿalā al-Manṭiqiyyīn and throughout Darʾ Taʿāruḍ al-ʿAql wa-l-Naql, he attacked the claim that knowledge fundamentally depends upon Aristotelian definitions and syllogisms. 1. The Theory of Definition (Ḥadd) He rejected the idea that complete conception necessarily requires a real Aristotelian definition. Many things are known through immediate conception, sense perception, experience, testimony, or nominal definition without possessing a ḥadd that reveals their essential reality. 2. The Restriction of Knowledge to Syllogism Ibn Taymiyyah did not deny that syllogistic reasoning can be valid. His objection was to the claim that it is the necessary or exclusive form of rational knowledge. Knowledge may arise through innate necessity, perception, experience, induction, and reliable testimony without being formulated as an Aristotelian syllogism. 3. The Universal Premise He criticized the structure of syllogistic reasoning for often requiring a universal premise that already contains, in a general form, the very judgment from which the particular conclusion is derived. Thus, the syllogism does not necessarily produce genuinely new knowledge; rather, its conclusion is already implicit in its premises. 4. Universals and Essences His criticism also extended to the Aristotelian treatment of universals. A universal such as “humanity” does not exist in external reality as a separate entity alongside individual humans. What exists externally are Zayd, ʿAmr, and Bakr; “human” as a universal is a mental concept abstracted from individual existents. In short: al-Ghazali absorbed and reformulated Aristotelian logic while limiting some of its claims, whereas Ibn Taymiyyah challenged its epistemological foundations and rejected the idea that Aristotelian definition and syllogism are necessary conditions for knowledge...  #Metaphysics    #Hylomorphism  #Philosophy
Al-Ghazali and Ibn Taymiyyah on Aristotelian Logic #Alghazali did not simply destroy Aristotelian logic; he appropriated it while criticizing some of its epistemological claims. Abu Hamid al-Ghazali authored The Standard of Knowledge (Miʿyar al-ʿIlm) and The Touchstone of Proof (Miḥakk al-Naẓar), and even introduced logical discussions into al-Mustaṣfā. He regarded logic, in itself, as a useful instrument for distinguishing sound reasoning from defective reasoning and therefore as applicable to Islamic disciplines. Nevertheless, he challenged the logicians’ claim that Aristotelian demonstrative syllogism is the only route to certainty. He questioned the assumption that knowledge necessarily depends on ḥadd—a complete, essential definition—and argued that many forms of knowledge cannot be acquired through Aristotelian syllogism alone. His project was therefore one of appropriation and reformulation, making logic serve theology, jurisprudence, and dialectics rather than treating it as the exclusive method of philosophy. #Ibntaymiyya , however, went much further: he challenged the epistemological foundations of Aristotelian logic itself. In al-Radd ʿalā al-Manṭiqiyyīn and throughout Darʾ Taʿāruḍ al-ʿAql wa-l-Naql, he attacked the claim that knowledge fundamentally depends upon Aristotelian definitions and syllogisms. 1. The Theory of Definition (Ḥadd) He rejected the idea that complete conception necessarily requires a real Aristotelian definition. Many things are known through immediate conception, sense perception, experience, testimony, or nominal definition without possessing a ḥadd that reveals their essential reality. 2. The Restriction of Knowledge to Syllogism Ibn Taymiyyah did not deny that syllogistic reasoning can be valid. His objection was to the claim that it is the necessary or exclusive form of rational knowledge. Knowledge may arise through innate necessity, perception, experience, induction, and reliable testimony without being formulated as an Aristotelian syllogism. 3. The Universal Premise He criticized the structure of syllogistic reasoning for often requiring a universal premise that already contains, in a general form, the very judgment from which the particular conclusion is derived. Thus, the syllogism does not necessarily produce genuinely new knowledge; rather, its conclusion is already implicit in its premises. 4. Universals and Essences His criticism also extended to the Aristotelian treatment of universals. A universal such as “humanity” does not exist in external reality as a separate entity alongside individual humans. What exists externally are Zayd, ʿAmr, and Bakr; “human” as a universal is a mental concept abstracted from individual existents. In short: al-Ghazali absorbed and reformulated Aristotelian logic while limiting some of its claims, whereas Ibn Taymiyyah challenged its epistemological foundations and rejected the idea that Aristotelian definition and syllogism are necessary conditions for knowledge... #Metaphysics #Hylomorphism #Philosophy

About