Turner vs driver. this man is a legend. set case law.
2026-02-05 16:16:37
418
jmh :
the lawsuits need to come from police pensions not taxpayers
2026-02-04 17:39:39
570
madisonbuyselltrade :
Cop talked his way right into a lawsuit and firing.
2026-02-07 22:08:43
150
Christopher Hendricks :
He won the lawsuit easily....
2026-02-03 15:00:29
205
Jonathan Carney233 :
Texas 38.02 plus SCOTUS says the cop is wrong
2026-02-03 16:45:46
245
smartaurse :
that was the Turner, of Turner v driver that made law, the cops never learn, they keep illegally detaining a guy that is winning lawsuits against them lol
cops don't care they don't have to pay for the lawsuit
2026-02-03 20:47:34
72
Shane Marcum :
your guilty until proven otherwise. they don't care about laws
2026-02-04 20:41:26
63
TreeMonkey_ma :
How much did they department pay in the tax funded settlement
2026-02-05 01:20:38
22
Mad Scottsman :
ill take the lawsuit 😁😁😁 buddy
2026-02-03 15:32:24
30
MozartL4 :
What’s the difference in this and Ice?
2026-02-05 16:52:56
12
user2968325946167 :
Wow. Can’t believe how cops think what they do is constitutional
2026-02-04 23:34:50
9
ingo1927 :
So he was in handcuffs for a long time for nothing. And they came out with his long explanation because they knew they were wrong. He was just hoping that there was a warrant so he could put him in a cage. That was his deepest desire. But remember, they have discretion. And then the police officer lies. It does release him without identification. What’s wrong with the police officers now many of them
2026-02-04 14:07:11
32
🕊🎗️Todd🐻JactUp🎗️🕊 :
This was an administrative arrest, Texas & 37 other states have this. Unlawful detainment, false imprisonment, no RAS shown which would require one to identify themselves.
2026-02-03 17:25:15
14
rickdickson49 :
how much did you get ?
2026-02-04 14:04:02
16
Päddy :
Land of the free 😂
2026-02-04 11:44:32
5
DominiRican11 :
Turner v. Driver refers to a 2017 federal court case where videographer Phillip Turner sued Fort Worth police officers for handcuffing him while he was recording police activity from a public sidewalk, leading to a significant ruling affirming the public's First Amendment right to film the police, subject to reasonable restrictions. The case established that while the public has a right to record, officers can detain individuals if they have reasonable suspicion, but handcuffing and placing someone in a patrol car for refusing to identify themselves while filming may constitute an unlawful arrest without probable cause, as the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity for that specific action.
2026-02-06 16:04:58
6
To see more videos from user @embaotxb55079, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.