Science
Region: US
Wednesday 11 February 2026 13:39:55 GMT
336880
26889
542
1546
Music
Download
Comments
davexmas :
What about Grahams number factorial?
2026-02-13 21:35:42
30
nefffffffffff :
I'm gonna invent nefffffffffff's number. it's grahams number +1.
2026-02-11 15:41:16
4367
itsrdh :
Do you ever feel like mathematicians are just making things up?
2026-02-12 03:54:21
265
Alenhendro :
Graham sounds like a kid arguing another kid saying his number is bigger than the other kid's number
2026-02-13 13:00:39
562
jamski999 :
1, 2, skip a few, 99, Graham’s number!
2026-02-12 01:33:21
1773
Wavey Davey :
domain expansion: graham's number
2026-02-11 20:49:21
713
Advon :
I counted to Graham’s number once
2026-02-13 06:07:38
215
john5366 🇬🇧 :
Hannah is normally very good but she made a fairly fundamental mistake in this explanation. 3^^^3 is NOT 3 ^ 7.6 trillion. It's WAAAY WAAAY WAAAY bigger than that. 3^^^3 = 3^^3^^3 = 3^^ 7.6 trillion. That's a power tower of 3's 7.6 trillion levels high! Which if each 3 was 2cm high would go all the way from the earth to the sun. A truly unimaginable number. (rather than 3 ^ 7.6 trillion which is just a power tower of 3's 4 levels high 3^3^3^3)
2026-02-17 21:09:11
45
raggy496 :
It’s not a useful number. So if you have grahams number and times it by 7. Does that come to chuck Norris’s number.
2026-02-13 18:13:18
13
Rick :
pfft Graham thinks he's so cool my boy zeno came up with infinity compared to infinity, Graham's number is basically zero
2026-02-14 11:47:44
14
TakeJohnMe :
what if you did the Graham's number thing but started with 4 instead of 3. wouldn't that automatically be bigger? Can we call it John's number?
2026-02-19 00:52:16
25
DrKSmith94 :
Jokes on you, my mom already said my head is a black hole
2026-02-12 04:06:30
12
DeEllis :
I thought my head was about to turn into a black hole, but thankfully I was a few digits off.
2026-02-12 06:12:24
428
Amber Walker :
Chuck Norris once counted to grahams number twice
2026-04-05 05:06:03
5
Brian Dene97 :
but what number are they trying to figure out? like, it was started with "it's at least 6" but what are they trying to find?
2026-03-09 15:21:57
12
mon_quiki :
My number ‘kiki’s number’ will be the multiplication of all numbers existing, non existing and yet to be created. You can’t get larger than that
2026-02-28 10:14:59
7
Paul Jacobs :
What about 4 instead of 3
2026-02-15 00:21:29
7
frostywindy :
Upper bound of what exactly? Andwhats the rationale for requiring 63ups? Why wasn’t 62 enough?
2026-02-17 09:23:26
26
Matt :
Why 3? Why not 2 or 4 or anything else?
2026-02-13 04:06:20
10
JoeyJoeyJoseph :
and then there's TREE (3)
2026-02-11 14:22:33
77
ugvudtdugiduhufygvuf :
love Graham's number. top three number right there
2026-02-12 00:49:43
41
Denglion :
ok so now explain Tree(3) and how it makes graham number effectively zero
2026-02-11 15:13:57
234
sirdoug87 :
grahams number isnt anywhere near the largest number it was for a while and then we got tree(3)
2026-02-11 21:33:18
101
Danosen :
So Grahamm said "this number is between 6 and infinite" but with a cooler name
2026-02-12 08:21:42
16
To see more videos from user @lisarqrsedb, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
