@mataramsaktiblora: New Colour Fazzio Hybrid 2026 🤩🤗 #fazzio #fazzioyamaha #hybrid #hitam #merah

bayu yamaha blora
bayu yamaha blora
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Thursday 26 February 2026 05:42:02 GMT
26892
295
3
318

Music

Download

Comments

sisillliiiaaa
𝓷𝓪𝓫𝔂𝓵𝓪_ :
kak izin post yaa🫰
2026-07-25 11:50:23
0
ahmadaswin1
Ahmad Aswin :
✌✌✌
2026-03-30 23:47:11
0
To see more videos from user @mataramsaktiblora, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🚨 THE JUDGE SHUT THIS DOWN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY — AND HERE’S WHY IT MATTERS. During the prosecution’s questioning of Lindsay Clancy’s mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, the subject of religion came up. She was asked whether she was part of the Catholic Church. Then came the question: Was she aware that, according to the Catholic faith, murder is considered a mortal sin? And almost immediately — sidebar. When court resumed, the judge made it clear to the jury that the religious reference was NOT something they were to consider. And there’s an important distinction here. This jury is not deciding whether what happened was a sin under Catholic doctrine. They are deciding Lindsay Clancy’s criminal responsibility under Massachusetts law. The prosecution’s apparent point is understandable: they want to establish that Lindsay understood killing was wrong. But knowing what your religion teaches about murder and being legally capable of appreciating the wrongfulness of your actions during an alleged episode of severe mental illness are NOT necessarily the same question. That is exactly what makes this trial so complicated. The defense says Lindsay was suffering from severe mental illness and was not criminally responsible. The prosecution says she knew exactly what she was doing. And the judge apparently did not want religion becoming another lens through which this jury decides it. I caught that exchange immediately because that was a VERY interesting line for the prosecution to attempt. What did you think when the judge stopped it? #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Courtroom #TrueCrime #Trial
🚨 THE JUDGE SHUT THIS DOWN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY — AND HERE’S WHY IT MATTERS. During the prosecution’s questioning of Lindsay Clancy’s mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, the subject of religion came up. She was asked whether she was part of the Catholic Church. Then came the question: Was she aware that, according to the Catholic faith, murder is considered a mortal sin? And almost immediately — sidebar. When court resumed, the judge made it clear to the jury that the religious reference was NOT something they were to consider. And there’s an important distinction here. This jury is not deciding whether what happened was a sin under Catholic doctrine. They are deciding Lindsay Clancy’s criminal responsibility under Massachusetts law. The prosecution’s apparent point is understandable: they want to establish that Lindsay understood killing was wrong. But knowing what your religion teaches about murder and being legally capable of appreciating the wrongfulness of your actions during an alleged episode of severe mental illness are NOT necessarily the same question. That is exactly what makes this trial so complicated. The defense says Lindsay was suffering from severe mental illness and was not criminally responsible. The prosecution says she knew exactly what she was doing. And the judge apparently did not want religion becoming another lens through which this jury decides it. I caught that exchange immediately because that was a VERY interesting line for the prosecution to attempt. What did you think when the judge stopped it? #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #Courtroom #TrueCrime #Trial

About