@trustbutverify2024: What time was Jesus crucified? The Bible gives two different answers. In Mark 15:25, Jesus is crucified at the third hour, about 9AM. In John 19:14-16, Jesus is still standing before Pilate at about the sixth hour, noon. So which is it? This isn’t about interpretation. It’s about timeline consistency. If Jesus was nailed to the cross at 9AM, how could he still be in Pilate’s court at noon on the same day? Christian apologists often appeal to Roman vs Jewish timekeeping or claim “approximation.” But does that actually resolve the contradiction, or is it post-hoc harmonization? If the Bible is 100% inerrant and historically reliable, this should be easy to reconcile. Let’s see the explanation in the comments. Keywords: Bible contradiction, crucifixion timeline, Mark vs John, Gospel contradictions, biblical inerrancy debate, Jesus crucifixion hour, Christian apologetics response, historical reliability of the Bible. #biblestudy #atheist #christiantok #deconstruction #exchristian

Peter ♒🇿🇲🇰🇪 :

why is it so hard just to say I don't know 😭

Erick Fusire :

You won the debate, but not the argument. Mark uses the traditional Jewish timekeeping, where the day starts at 6 a.m., so the third hour would be 9 a.m., when Jesus was crucified. John uses Roman timekeeping, where the day starts at midnight, so the sixth hour would be 6 a.m., when Jesus stood before Pilate. Therefore, the correct position is that Jesus stood before Pilate at about 6 a.m. and was crucified at about 9 a.m.

John Murphy :

No the time in John was Roman time which is 6am which aligns up with Mark

Myles4x4 Colbert :

9am? They didn’t have time back then

🌊Piscean🌊 :

Jamal :

They nailed the human nature first at 9 and then the god divine nature at 6…

Mbheshu :

Jesus was crucified,the issue of morning or afternoon is nt important.Rember that it happened 2000yrs ago so different times are possible

@ ተርጉዋሚ መሀመድ ምትኩ :

nailed him and then take him down to bring him to court and then they nailed him again?

Victor :

I'm going to give her a little bit of credit. It sounded like she was prepared to have an honest conversation based on her understanding.

Counselor Kittson Adams :

that is not contradictions when comparing John and Mark. if John says the same thing in two different places in that same book, then you can say it is contradictions. remember that they all received the information on different occasions.

danielsandonu :

That is a report by one disciple and it could be wrong because it was a reported or hear say

SUBCaptain :

That whole book has a lot of contradictory story about the same events.

Diana :

Typical Xtian pretzel-brain thinking to try to rectify egregious nonsense in their book. 🥨🧠

MrDee1 :

Or, or, or......... this fable did not really happen at all. 👀

Rough66 :

when you put it like that..🤣

tommythomas823 :

Mark wasn't even born so how would he know 🤣🤣🤣

Ronald Chripo :

I love it here

Tyrone Michaud :

Well said bro 🔥💯🔥💯🔥💯

Christ way :

"It’s not a contradiction, John and Mark are using different time systems. One uses Roman time (around 6 AM), the other Jewish time (9 AM), so the timeline actually fits."

Fred_official :

the two books spoke of two different traditional time, Roman and Jewish tradition. Mark spoke of the Jewish traditional time and John Time was based on Roman traditional time

Junito :

The eclipse lasted three hours, yet nobody history recorded it. However, the longest eclipse in the history was seven minutes it was recorded was 743 BC and recorded

Nethan :

Brother , 🤔🤔🤔 practically think how many people use clock ⏰️those days , 🤔 its a common sense , 🤔 mostly they might used approximate time , as a calender they might used different time too right 🤔🤔🤔

Mbalekwa Jerry :

Who was looking at the time, where was the watch ⌚. There was no watches that time.

BigMarcSays :

Noon in olden days was 3pm.

dixonramos881 :

Their was no time in those days.