@whateverpod: Andrew Wilson HIGH LEVEL DEBATE vs. liberal woman?! Whatever Podcast Debates

Staging Environment :

Her viewpoint: “Nothing is true, so nothing can be debated — SO DEBATE ME ON IT!”

StrandedFijian :

Andrew’s was correct in stopping that conversation and want to move on to the next topic, because you can’t justify something that proves everything cannot be justified….its self contradicting

Roggers :

she was prepared but still failed

Joe Blow :

Agrippas trilemma fails Agrippas Trilemma

Paradise One Designs :

she's just using word salads

onetruedaver :

She's giving an axiom that no axiom can be justified. She doesn't see the conflict.

Princess Hyacinth :

Andrew comes off like the guy who read the Wikipedia intro on the subject and considers himself an expert

Joey Handz :

She is critiquing him using Agrippas which says nothing is justifiable? lol so why is she justifying her critique?

Marc_Tanya :

She thinks if she just uses big words, her opponent will concede

tricelas :

Let's simplify this. Truth claim: There are NO absolute truths. Self defeating... therefore not true.

futureban2026 :

Love him or hate him you have to give this guy credit. He’s an amazing debater.

Alexander Harbin :

It’s self refuting lol. “There is no absolute truth” is an absolute truth claim. Agrippas Trilemma is defeated by its own definition.

SlimeKrewTyrone :

She asked gpt for 6 buzzwords

Allen :

smart women own him lol

Emiliana :

Comments are mad that she’s beating him at his own game 😭

lupuspawner :

the difference between memorizing information and understanding information

Jimmy Wolford :

He uno reversed her argument🤣

fullyattenuated :

"All generalizations are incorrect <- including this one."

nooch.16 :

Grafter :

Don’t have a clue wat they are saying

Incisive :

….cannot believe he ran away from gripping the tricycle

CHUCK BABY :

Agrippas Trilemma is a "false trichotomy" or it is self-defeating, because the trilemma itself relies on reasoning that may be subject to the same three limitations.

khalidrttt :

Wilson is unfortunately correct in this scenario

Ama - Adaora’s Dad :

It’s not that agrippas trilemma isn’t true, it’s just that it’s pointless to use it in debate because you usually enter a debate accepting certain prerequisites like that things can be true and that someone’s argument can be correct. Arguing on the basis that nothing can be certainly true is meaningless in debate