@davidwilberblog: In a recent video, Tucker Carlson argued that a future physical temple in Jerusalem would amount to a denial of Christ, claiming that the Bible teaches Jesus replaced the temple entirely. He further claims that anyone who would like to see a future temple is apostate and has missed the whole point of Christianity. But does Scripture actually support these claims? In this video, we take a careful look at what Jesus and the apostles believed about the Jerusalem temple to see whether Tucker’s argument holds up biblically. What did Jesus actually teach about the temple? And how did the apostles treat it after the Messiah's resurrection and ascension? CC: @Tucker Carlson
I literally came across a teaching I did a year ago on how most people miss that the future Temple belongs to Hashem. 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4.
2026-03-06 18:29:20
2
Courtney :
It would be nice if political commentators would stick to their day job and commentate on policies and not the theology. Why? Because they’re woefully inadequate to do so.
2026-03-20 13:54:33
2
Shay🦁 :
Thanks for this David, and though I see what point you're making.. here's where I disagree. Yeshua fulfilled the law right? (we are in agreement with what that actually means).. it's a spiritual matter first-- just like circumcision is NOTHING without your heart being circumcised. So I believe this is Tuckers whole point. The temple is fulfilled by Christ, and WE are the temple when we have Christ.
A physical temple is not where God resides anymore. A temple is nothing if you don't have Christ in your heart. And most Jews DENY Christ, which is I think his whole point
2026-03-08 15:23:08
3
To see more videos from user @davidwilberblog, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.