@unspooked_project: stirner vs marx #egoistphilosophy #maxstirner #philosophytiktok

Marsh :

Stirner? You mean Engels?

traffic Cone :

usefull thanks.

Darell JN Mawitjere :

Max Stirner/ Diogenes & Carl Marks / Socrates at their time.

fwangel :

Stirner was just coping cause Engels used to shove him into lockers

K Ejnermark :

they are both right, instans follow

Lucas :

Stirner was an alt-account made by Engels to ragebait Marx

Eric Hacker :

Marx convinces me in "German Idealism" (chapter Saint Max), but Stirner still has some points 😁

pink_dragonfruit :

“The state can really easily become and authority “ ummm okay???

☭dk :

this opened my eyes more ngl

Itai :

The problem starts when you adhere Hegel's unrealistic idea of dialectic.

Ruan Malan :

Interesting, thank you. Room for both to have some validity unless we turn both theories into spooks.

Safouan :

this is such a good summary from what I've read so far

LAB RAT 🏳️‍⚧️🏴Ⓐ :

I love Stirner sm

2wiceThomas :

Have you noticed how similar young Samuel Beckett and Stirner look? How their radical departures from mainstream have similarities also? Weird. But we see unexplainable concurrences frequently. One example: Nabokov's Bend Sinister and Kafka's The Castle. or what about the rise of absurdism? Spooks, another word for egregore. We build them. We do.

tomb :

Genuinely excellent summary

ash :

is this ai or real

Mohammedthegreat2 :

Great explanation

coier207 :

interesting thank you for sharing

ROBAMERCADONAS :

Stirner was Engels alter ego, like in the fight club

Zweifallsreichtum :

there is no difference because both are made up by Engels

Vučko :

Stirner's argument falls apart when looked at critically. It is not man's way of thinking of these concepts that gives them power but them having power over man. The state is only authority of backed by guns, by consequences, morality is only useful as long is it preserves society, making it easier for collective and individual survival. These are social relations given names by man, but by no means do they originate in thought, but through material necessity.

babyboy :

stirner was smart asf, all these commies in the chat smh. feudalism and capatalism co existed and stemmed from different origins, marx was wrong on his origin of idea but material condition is still important

Big chungus :

stirner isnt real it was all a joke made up by marx and engels

anarchonazbol :