@yaneabreu_: SHA CERLIN cama con almacenamiento hidráulico que levanta el colchón para aprovechar el espacio oculto debajo de la cama. #TikTokShopCreatorPicks #TikTokShopStockUp #greenish #storagebed #homefinds @SHA CERLIN

Yanelys Abreu
Yanelys Abreu
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 15 March 2026 07:53:55 GMT
4546
21
1
4

Music

Download

Comments

lorenafrau62
𝐿𝑜𝓇𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝓋𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓏🦋 :
Súper buena esa es la cama q necesito
2026-03-15 07:59:37
0
ibelsis_ttshop
Ibelsis 🕊️🧿 :
Wow se ve que tiene muchisimo espacio
2026-03-16 02:21:08
0
To see more videos from user @yaneabreu_, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Seven men accused. One woman alleging hours of sexual assault. A fraternity group chat that demands serious scrutiny. A former Cornell student, identified as Jane Doe, alleges in a civil lawsuit that seven students sexually assaulted her at the Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024. She was 20 years old. According to her complaint, she was given alcohol and drugs, including ketamine, and sexually assaulted over several hours while unable to consent. She alleges that a message sent to a fraternity Snapchat group drew additional men to the room. A screenshot of the alleged exchange appears in the complaint. What was communicated? Who participated? What did people actually know—and what did they do with that knowledge? Those questions deserve an investigation grounded in evidence. Everyone’s individual conduct matters. Being in a group chat alone does not establish that someone saw a message, understood what was happening, or committed a crime. But messages allegedly encouraging sexual assault cannot simply be brushed aside as jokes. The initial criminal investigation in 2024 resulted in no charges. In September 2026, prosecutors reopened the investigation and announced plans to present the case to a grand jury. Cornell says its separate disciplinary process resulted in expulsions and suspensions, and the Chi Phi chapter remains barred from campus. Why did the original investigation end without charges? What evidence was reviewed? What evidence wasn’t? And did the people responsible for student safety meet their obligations? These are questions I intend to examine—not skip over. And let me make my position perfectly clear: IF YOU ARE DEFENDING RAPE OR EXCUSING MESSAGES THAT ENCOURAGE SEXUAL ASSAULT, YOU’RE JUST AS SICK. Asking for evidence and a fair investigation is legitimate. Treating a woman’s alleged assault as entertainment, blaming her for being intoxicated, or making excuses for sexual violence is something entirely different. As soon as my mouth is better, I’ll be doing a deep dive and discussing this case. We’ll look at the complaint, the alleged messages, the investigation, Cornell’s response, and the questions that still need answers. Read beyond the headlines. Pay attention to the evidence. Remember there is a real person behind the name “Jane Doe.” — True Crime with Natasha Cooper The civil allegations are disputed and are not criminal convictions. Responsibility must be established individually through evidence. #Cornell7 #CornellUniversity #JaneDoe #SexualAssaultAwareness #truecrimewithnatashacooper
Seven men accused. One woman alleging hours of sexual assault. A fraternity group chat that demands serious scrutiny. A former Cornell student, identified as Jane Doe, alleges in a civil lawsuit that seven students sexually assaulted her at the Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024. She was 20 years old. According to her complaint, she was given alcohol and drugs, including ketamine, and sexually assaulted over several hours while unable to consent. She alleges that a message sent to a fraternity Snapchat group drew additional men to the room. A screenshot of the alleged exchange appears in the complaint. What was communicated? Who participated? What did people actually know—and what did they do with that knowledge? Those questions deserve an investigation grounded in evidence. Everyone’s individual conduct matters. Being in a group chat alone does not establish that someone saw a message, understood what was happening, or committed a crime. But messages allegedly encouraging sexual assault cannot simply be brushed aside as jokes. The initial criminal investigation in 2024 resulted in no charges. In September 2026, prosecutors reopened the investigation and announced plans to present the case to a grand jury. Cornell says its separate disciplinary process resulted in expulsions and suspensions, and the Chi Phi chapter remains barred from campus. Why did the original investigation end without charges? What evidence was reviewed? What evidence wasn’t? And did the people responsible for student safety meet their obligations? These are questions I intend to examine—not skip over. And let me make my position perfectly clear: IF YOU ARE DEFENDING RAPE OR EXCUSING MESSAGES THAT ENCOURAGE SEXUAL ASSAULT, YOU’RE JUST AS SICK. Asking for evidence and a fair investigation is legitimate. Treating a woman’s alleged assault as entertainment, blaming her for being intoxicated, or making excuses for sexual violence is something entirely different. As soon as my mouth is better, I’ll be doing a deep dive and discussing this case. We’ll look at the complaint, the alleged messages, the investigation, Cornell’s response, and the questions that still need answers. Read beyond the headlines. Pay attention to the evidence. Remember there is a real person behind the name “Jane Doe.” — True Crime with Natasha Cooper The civil allegations are disputed and are not criminal convictions. Responsibility must be established individually through evidence. #Cornell7 #CornellUniversity #JaneDoe #SexualAssaultAwareness #truecrimewithnatashacooper

About