feel193
Region: US
Sunday 15 March 2026 09:03:29 GMT
17233
304
24
3
Music
Download
Comments
expose the corrupt :
this is a lawsuit they can't just make someone leave for no crime
2026-03-15 21:06:43
19
David Montgomery3041 :
lawsuit baby
2026-05-10 22:16:54
1
Chris :
Easy lawsuit
2026-03-16 11:03:20
11
jerryjohnson1627 :
I’m not going to argue with you about it….translation- I don’t know the law just do as I say
2026-03-16 17:53:23
10
johnbauer86 :
What happened since this was recorded
2026-03-20 14:33:20
1
phantom :
bb
2026-03-17 00:03:53
0
fisherman :
Thank them for the lawsuit
2026-04-03 00:03:58
0
Ram Siva :
First Amendment audits are controversial because they involve individuals recording interactions with public officials in public spaces to test their constitutional rights, often leading to confrontations and debates over privacy, legality, and intent. Here’s a breakdown of the key controversies: • Confrontational Methods: Auditors often adopt aggressive or insistent behavior, which critics argue disrupts public order and targets officials unfairly. This approach can escalate tensions, with some auditors deliberately provoking reactions for content creation. • Privacy and Legal Boundaries: While courts like in Glik v. Cunniffe (2011) affirm the right to record in public, critics highlight concerns about filming government employees without consent in spaces where privacy expectations exist. Legal debates also arise over whether auditors obstruct official duties or violate local laws. • Monetization and Motives: Many auditors monetize their content through platforms like YouTube, raising questions about whether their actions prioritize profit over genuine accountability. Critics argue this incentivizes provocative behavior, while supporters maintain their focus remains on transparency. • Retaliation and Chilling Effects: Auditors often face harassment charges or legal pushback, which they frame as retaliation for their activism. Critics warn this creates a chilling effect on free expression, while auditors view it as evidence of systemic resistance to oversight. • Polarized Perspectives: Supporters see audits as vital for exposing misconduct and upholding civil liberties, while opponents call them "police agitators" that undermine public trust and official authority. These tensions reflect broader debates about balancing transparency with respect for privacy and institutional order.
2026-03-15 17:56:52
1
Happy :
Shamefull acting from the police. Ego came up to end with directions.
2026-03-18 14:09:05
1
Kenny Miller :
o no we're not done, complaint, oath of office, Brady list, and law suit
2026-05-06 14:17:39
0
DAB :
what are government doesn't steal law enforcement pays in law suits
2026-03-16 11:01:00
0
Smezon :
That arrogant sergeant is completely wrong
2026-03-20 04:24:26
0
❌Ozzy❌ :
no such thing as a peace officer
2026-03-16 08:28:08
0
Brian Fisher :
1st,4th amendment violation constitution law a big federal lawsuit against these police officers needs to understand the constitution law
2026-04-03 06:57:09
0
jeff :
Great job officers !!
2026-03-16 03:10:11
3
Wayne :
🤣🤣🤣
2026-04-04 19:55:58
0
bigdaddy :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-04-01 17:48:26
0
Liberator X2000 :
Taxpayer's money hard at work preserving you and your constitutional rights again.😏 Yeah right 🤨 I'll respect you when you respect my rights.🤨 An ignorant with a gun is a danger to the public. 🤔
2026-03-15 23:41:14
0
To see more videos from user @feel17211mh, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
