Kendra
Region: US
Tuesday 17 March 2026 23:07:52 GMT
46695
199
26
20
Music
Download
Comments
Traci DeMichele :
Criticism can be constructive.
2026-03-29 14:43:07
153
Jasmine🤍 :
if feedback can be critical that makes it criticism
2026-03-23 18:32:32
26
notjackieoh :
unfortunately criticism isn’t a bad thing. as long as it’s with good intentions, it shouldn’t be looked as a bad thing. but i get where you’re coming from.
2026-03-24 21:24:28
18
Things that make you say hmmmm :
Semantics
2026-03-28 01:33:49
2
ZAE 🌀 :
Queen energy 👑
2026-03-18 01:00:44
1
bb.bulla :
Huh🤨
2026-03-18 06:00:04
29
mya :
omg u look so pretty
2026-03-18 06:05:43
2
S Rae :
I have loved hearing your story and the continued coverage of your life
2026-03-18 16:01:22
3
Chantel Moniz :
I really don’t like how people don’t respect the beauty that is you and make it seem like their disrespect is genuine care. We can decide for ourselves what genuine care is, thanks❤️
2026-03-17 23:43:11
3
HappyGoLiving :
Dang, girl, this is excellent!
2026-03-19 03:03:07
0
Sevyn of the Stars :
I love this! Thank you! Well said! Good on you!
2026-05-11 10:40:41
1
Tabs :
“Thank you, I know” 👏
2026-03-21 04:11:30
0
Oktaviya :
I love the iconography in the background 🥰
2026-03-21 02:59:10
0
Amanda/Andie :
Semantics, IMO. So yes, is your answer. Thanks!
2026-03-18 17:20:45
7
Charles Shea :
You've hit on something really significant here. There's this massive double standard where intellectual complexity gets celebrated and respected, but emotional complexity gets pathologized and shut down. Think about it - if someone spent hours working through a complex mathematical proof, testing different approaches, considering edge cases, building elaborate frameworks to solve a problem, that would be seen as rigorous thinking. Admirable dedication. If a physicist mapped out intricate theoretical scenarios to understand particle behavior, that's just good science. But do the same level of systematic analysis with emotions, relationships, or social dynamics? Suddenly you're "overthinking," "being dramatic," "making it too complicated," or "spiraling." The same cognitive processes that get praised in STEM contexts get treated like pathology when applied to human experience. The bias is fucking stark. Mathematical complexity: "Wow, look at that brilliant mind at work." Emotional complexity: "You need to calm down and simplify." This happens because emotional complexity threatens people. It suggests that their surface-level interactions might be missing something important. It implies that feelings and relationships are as worthy of rigorous analysis as equations. It challenges the idea that emotions should be simple, contained, easily manageable. Society has this vested interest in keeping emotional processing shallow because deep emotional intelligence reveals uncomfortable truths about power dynamics, authenticity, manipulation, social conditioning. A person who can systematically analyze emotional patterns is harder to gaslight, harder to dismiss, harder to control. The "just keep it simple" crowd benefits from emotional illiteracy. They don't want people developing sophisticated frameworks for understanding human behavior because that threatens systems that rely on people not thinking too deeply about why they feel what they feel.
2026-04-17 03:16:53
3
lizaboujee :
You are
2026-05-20 11:21:16
1
Abby :
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💯💯💯💯👏👏👏👏💯💯💯💯💯👏👏👏
2026-03-18 12:19:30
1
To see more videos from user @kendrahilty, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
